Agenda Profile: Anti Allas
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is directed toward budget allocation mechanisms, particularly the negative labeling associated with "katuserahad" (discretionary grants). The speaker moderately supports regional funding initiatives aimed at meeting the needs of state institutions. This position is strongly policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing the importance of regional representation in budget formation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of budgetary terminology ("earmarked local funding," "the budget") and regional financing processes. The expertise is procedural, centering on the role of a Member of Parliament (Riigikogu) in identifying the needs of local government agencies and ensuring those needs are incorporated into the budget. There is an absence of references to technical data or statistics, but practical work experience is highlighted.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and interrogative, directed at the minister for the purpose of obtaining a definitional clarification. The rhetoric is logical and practical, avoiding emotional appeals. The objective is to gain clarity regarding the concept in order to organize one's work more effectively in the future.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient information.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No direct confrontation is expressed, as this is a question posed to the minister, not criticism. However, the speaker challenges the negative labeling associated with the term "earmarks," referring to it as "ugly earmarks." The criticism is aimed instead at the pejorative use of the term in public debate.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker addresses the member of government (the minister) directly to seek clarification, which signals a willingness for dialogue and cooperation regarding definitions. The objective is to improve their work going forward, which necessitates understanding the government's position. Data on inter-party cooperation is lacking.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly regional, emphasizing that the member of the Riigikogu is elected from a specific area and must visit that region to identify local needs. Preference is given to funding directed at the needs of local government institutions, which is derived from direct regional input.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports targeted public expenditure (budgeting) that addresses regional needs, particularly concerning state institutions. This indicates support for a flexible budgetary process that allows for regional allocations, contrasting with strictly centralized fiscal discipline.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient information.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is procedural and definitional, centering on how budget allocations are categorized and justified. The objective is to gain clarity on the concept of "katuserahad" (discretionary funding/earmarks) in order to better organize our work when submitting regional funding requirements.
1 Speeches Analyzed