By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk
Total Sessions: 110
Fully Profiled: 110
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The politician strongly opposes the draft regulation concerning platform services, focusing on two primary issues: the removal of the photograph from the service provider card, which compromises client safety, and the unjustified urgency of the bill. This stance is aimed at protecting the security of citizens and consumers and demanding adherence to sound legislative practices. The arguments presented in the bill's sales pitch (clarity, transparency) are being dubbed mere slogans.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the proposed law on planning simplification, arguing that it significantly reduces public involvement and notification. This stance is policy-driven, stressing that the simplification is actually contrary to the stated goals, and calling the draft bill "a very bad law from the people's perspective." The speaker emphasizes that there can never be too much inclusion.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The most striking issue is the poor quality of state budget planning, evidenced by the large carried-over amounts (2.27 billion euros in activities). The speaker adopts a strongly critical stance toward the government (the Reform Party), accusing them of creating the economic situation and mismanaging the budget. The political framework is clearly performance-based, focusing on the ministries' poor budgeting capabilities and planning failures.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker strongly opposes the current implementation of Rail Baltic, focusing on the problems faced by landowners and the destruction of land improvement systems. The political position is aimed at criticizing the execution, emphasizing that making the project cheaper unfairly burdens landowners. He/She also stresses the importance of parliamentary accountability, criticizing the resistance to forming an investigative committee.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to centralization, as it increases costs for citizens and reduces the accessibility of public services, especially in rural areas. The speaker criticizes the government's tendency to increasingly shift the burden of service costs onto the people, citing the reduction of birth registration locations as an example. These views are strongly results-oriented, focusing on the practical operation and accessibility of the services.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The most prominent theme is national defense capability and resource management, with the speaker criticizing the government's overly optimistic assessment of defense readiness. He emphasizes the need to ensure the adequate provisioning of the Defense League and opposes the transfer of assets (such as SUVs) to Ukraine when they are needed in Estonia. His framework is clearly results-oriented, demanding the acknowledgment of existing problems.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker is a prominent opposition figure whose main focus areas are the government's tax policy (especially opposing the car tax) and defending the procedural rules of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Their positions are strongly value-driven and results-oriented, emphasizing integrity in lawmaking, political culture, and protecting vulnerable groups from the tax burden. The speaker sharply criticizes the coalition's tactics regarding the handling of draft legislation and the implementation of the 51-vote requirement.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance, focusing on an analysis of the minister's actions and values, and stressing that a wide chasm exists between the minister's values and those of the Estonian people. The political framework is heavily value-based and results-oriented, citing the low approval ratings of the minister and his party (3% and 10%). The main objections relate to the reduction of child benefits and controversial social positions.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on data protection and the oversight of state officials’ activities, particularly concerning the justifications provided for accessing data from the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) camera systems. The speaker adopts a strongly critical stance, highlighting the existence of practical issues within these data access justifications, citing the PPA’s own analysis. The focus is rather on performance-driven criticism, demanding concrete data regarding the behavior of these officials.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oriented toward supporting national defense, stressing the need for a diverse toolkit, which includes allowing the use of anti-personnel mines for the country's defense. He/She is also critical of the current operations of the Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing (ERJK), having repeatedly described the situation as "completely absurd." These views are primarily value-driven (national defense) and results-driven (institutional inefficiency).
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The political stance centers heavily on criticizing the government's inaction, particularly concerning promises outlined in the coalition agreement (specifically, larger road trains/trucks). The speaker pushes back against the idea that Estonia desperately needs large amounts of foreign labor, emphasizing instead that the country can cope by acting intelligently. The overall focus is on implementing results-based policy and boosting economic efficiency.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s tax policy and excessive regulation (such as sustainability reports and the biofuel mandate). Key issues include national security (reinstating the use of anti-personnel mines) and stimulating the economy through income tax reduction. Their political activity is framed by accusations that the government is arrogant, incompetent, and fails to stand up for Estonian interests in Europe. They emphasize that EKRE has repeatedly proposed solutions which the government has later reluctantly adopted.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The political focus is currently on national security, particularly regarding the failed inspection of the tanker Jaguar and the overall level of Estonia’s operational capability. The speaker harshly criticizes the government’s handling of the situation, raising serious questions about the chain of decision-making, the accessibility of ministers, and a potential information leak. The criticism targets the government’s actions and lack of transparency, stressing that simply denying the existence of problems won’t change the reality of the situation.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is centered on fiscal responsibility and the reform of public administration. The speaker strongly opposes the tax hikes implemented over a short period, particularly the increase in the income tax rate. The main requirement is reducing the number of civil servants and lowering the administrative burden in order to make the state "leaner." This stance is heavily directed toward criticizing the government's actions and overall performance.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's plan to import cheap labor, viewing it as a threat to both the Estonian economy and national security. Emphasis is placed on the need to support the domestic workforce, innovation, and lifelong learning. The position is presented critically, accusing the government of ignoring specialists and threat assessments, and moving towards the Swedish migration model.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the coalition's actions regarding double standards (gender quotas) and injustice (compensation, local government funding). The main themes are improving economic competitiveness through withdrawal from CO2 regulation and fair compensation for private property in the event of restrictions. The framework is strongly value-based and performance-driven, accusing the government of incompetence and creating absurd situations.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, questioning the government's legitimacy due to low approval ratings (below 20%). Key issues include ensuring energy security through oil shale energy and opposing justice reforms that violate the public's sense of fairness, particularly concerning the accelerated release of prisoners. The framing is value-based (justice, national wealth) and performance-based (the government's failure).
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong oppositional stance, focusing on improving the cost of living and economic competitiveness by lowering excise duties and VAT. Criticism is aimed at the government’s priorities (such as cutting family benefits, Rail Baltic, and wind energy) and poor budget management. The political framework is primarily results-based, stressing the necessity of supporting the Estonian people and businesses rather than seeking European approval. Politicians should be realists and try again if their previous proposals have failed to pass.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's reforms, particularly concerning the funding of social welfare and the restructuring of educational institutions. It is emphasized that the state shifted responsibility onto local municipalities without adequate funding, labeling the social welfare reform a failure. The policy is directed towards preserving regional life and communities, standing in opposition to centralization.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on energy security and the transition, highlighting the unreliability of wind power during periods of calm. The speaker is a strong supporter of nuclear energy and views the utilization of oil shale as a necessary transitional measure until nuclear power becomes available. Furthermore, there is a strong emphasis on the right and obligation of local municipalities to protect their residents and the local environment. The political framework itself is a blend of policy-driven and value-based approaches.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most prominent theme is the opposition to e-voting, with the speaker strongly demanding its complete abolition in Estonia. This stance is principled and policy-driven, highlighting the lack of security, trust, and transparency. This political position is further supported by referencing the practices of major countries worldwide.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on strong opposition to the motor vehicle tax, which is being characterized as a failed and discriminatory piece of legislation—a so-called "botched omnibus bill." This stance is value-based, highlighting the lack of uniformity and equality, and demanding the immediate repeal of the law. The speaker believes that any attempt to fix the legislation is merely "carrying water with a sieve."
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition to the motor vehicle tax, which is deemed unfair and burdensome for large families and people with disabilities, demanding its complete repeal. It is stressed that the government's actions often amount to mere busywork or diversionary tactics, and the lack of statesmanship in accepting the opposition's sound proposals is criticized. The stance is strongly value-driven, focusing on social justice and human dignity.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is on strengthening national defense readiness, underscoring the principle that "every contribution counts." The speaker strongly supports the maximum inclusion of reservists, criticizing a systemic error that has excluded 2,000 to 2,500 former conscripts from rescue companies from the reserve pool. The issue is being framed as policy- and solutions-based, focusing on correcting a long-standing administrative oversight.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly focused on repealing the motor vehicle tax, which is regarded as the biggest blunder of recent times and an unjust burden. The speaker demands that the government acknowledge and rectify its errors, while simultaneously sharply criticizing the government's efforts to push through draft legislation concerning gender identity, labeling them as absurd. The position is deeply value-based, stressing fairness and concern for low-income individuals and large families.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The political position is heavily centered on the rapid development of energy infrastructure, emphasizing the necessity of increasing connections with Finland (Estlink) to import cheaper electricity. The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the current focus on wind energy, deeming it a one-sided or ineffective policy. The overall focus is policy-driven and results-oriented (specifically, lowering prices).
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on strengthening national defense and ensuring the financial well-being of reservists. The speaker strongly supports a draft bill that would increase the pay for reserve training exercises to compensate for inflation and tax benefits lost since 2018. This stance is critical of the inaction by the previous government and ministries, which has severely diminished the ability of citizens to cope financially.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the government’s plan to bring foreign prisoners into Estonia, a proposal which is being met with skepticism. The main emphasis is placed on political integrity and accountability, especially regarding the alleged fraud stemming from the case involving Eesti 200, Slava Ukraini, and Johanna-Maria Lehtme, thereby underscoring the will of the people as the ultimate sovereign power.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government’s low legitimacy and a tax policy detrimental to the populace. The speaker demands increased funding for local governments and criticizes the forcing through of education and environmental policies (the closure of vocational schools, cuts to environmental education) in the absence of popular support. The policy framing is both results-based (the benefit of the people) and values-based (legitimacy and a sense of security).
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on investigating the safety and prior communication regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The speaker strongly supports establishing an investigative commission to ensure transparency and determine the potential risks associated with the vaccines. The stance is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the principle of safety and criticizing previous inaccurate claims.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The political focus is on holding the executive branch accountable and on parliamentary oversight. The speaker strongly supports the bill that mandates ministers to provide information to committees, viewing this as a constructive approach that serves the interests of all. Criticism is directed at those who consider a motion of no confidence the only way to call ministers to order, which is ineffective due to the coalition's majority. The framing of the bill is procedural and performance-driven.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on the sharp criticism of the government's energy policy, which is being labeled as "deceitful" and has resulted in the untrustworthiness of the "Reform yoke government." The speaker urgently demands accountability and transparency regarding the officials at the Ministry of Climate and the companies that provided the data, highlighting the government's presentation of false information. The stance is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, focusing on the failures and cover-ups of the government's actions.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on regulating the population of large predators (wolves, bears) to protect property in rural areas and ensure the public's sense of security. The speaker strongly supports Bill 567, which would grant licensed hunters the right to cull nuisance animals, arguing that the current system is ineffective. Criticism is aimed at the Environmental Board’s failure to resolve the situation, meaning this is primarily a results-driven political framework.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the car tax, which is described as an unfair and confusing new burden. They emphasize the necessity of a uniform and logical tax system where everyone should be treated equally. This standpoint is primarily policy- and value-based, focusing specifically on the lack of fairness.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on issues of citizenship and sovereignty. The speaker supports revoking the voting rights of citizens from aggressor states, but is categorically opposed to enshrining the right to vote for stateless persons in the constitution, deeming this fundamentally wrong and unacceptable. He/She stresses that only Estonian citizens should be allowed to vote in local elections.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely anti-government, centering on the unrealistic promises made regarding energy policy (14.9 cents/kWh) and questioning the integrity of the government's activities. Particular concern is raised over the free handover of state databases (the Meta case) and potential corruption scandals (Nordica, Pakosta). The main focus is on underscoring the government's incompetence and the absence of values-based leadership.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It focuses on preventing and reducing the misuse of residence permits and visas, which is addressed in the draft legislation currently under discussion. The position is policy-based, requiring statistical data (four-year trends) from the government to assess the effectiveness of the measures.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the minister's position on social gender issues, denying the existence of societal consensus. This position is value-driven, focusing on parental concerns and challenging the absolute validity of scientific authority. The opposition is intense, expressing "extreme sadness" regarding the minister's responses.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on the cost of living crisis and the overall tax burden. The speaker vehemently opposes the proposed car tax, labeling it as double taxation, and urgently calls for the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs to 5% in order to support both consumers and domestic producers. The government's actions are criticized due to poor budget management and a narrow, short-sighted approach, with the emphasis being placed on the fact that high expenditures constitute a security issue.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the criticism of the State Budget Basic Law and the performance-based budget draft. The speaker is convinced that performance-based budgeting has failed and demands the government have the courage to admit this and revert to previous practices. The position is strongly performance-oriented, emphasizing the system's inability to prevent major budgetary errors.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political focus is on the transparency of state-owned enterprise management and government accountability, especially in the context of Nordica’s bankruptcy, which resulted in a hefty taxpayer loss. The speaker urgently demands the full public disclosure of Nordica’s special audit to expose management failures and ensure that the governing bodies of other state-owned companies learn from these mistakes. The stance is strongly performance-based, centering on administrative errors and fiscal responsibility.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly aimed at increasing transparency and accountability, supporting a draft bill that would make the expenses of senior officials clearly understandable to the taxpayer. It also emphasizes the supremacy of the Riigikogu over the Government of the Republic, defining the Riigikogu as the employer and the Government as the employee. This stance is strongly procedural and value-based, focusing on good governance practices.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on energy security and the reliability of supply. The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the government’s planned gas power plant, arguing that it could rely on an unstable external supply chain. He strongly supports investing in the existing oil shale energy capacity to ensure a domestic reserve option for emergencies or "black days."
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's energy policy, particularly concerning the accelerated construction of wind farms and the ten-year acceleration of the phase-out of oil shale energy. The stance is both value-based and procedural, highlighting the hypocrisy of the government's actions and accusing them of steamrolling the public in favor of business interests. The political objective is to ensure considered and wise decision-making instead of rushing.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance focuses heavily on consumer protection and the practical aspects of complying with European Union product requirements for e-commerce imports. This position is aimed at policy implementation, demanding clarity regarding the handling of goods and the associated costs. Highlighting the problems of lost funds and stalled merchandise demonstrates concern about the regulation's actual impact on citizens.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely opposed to the car tax, which is viewed as damaging to Estonian people and businesses, and detrimental to society as a whole. Emphasis is placed on its disproportionality and unfairness, particularly regarding the taxation of stolen vehicles and the destruction of the classic car culture. The political framework is primarily policy-driven, focusing on the practical implementation and social deficiencies of the draft legislation.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional to the government's activities, focusing on population policy and ensuring national confidence and security. The speaker sharply criticizes the breaking of pre-election promises and the reduction of benefits for large families. The policy framing is results-oriented, accusing the government of preparing a tax cascade detrimental to families.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is clearly and strongly against raising the alcohol excise tax, emphasizing its negative impact on public health (due to the resulting underground trade) and the economy (as money flows to Latvia). The speaker stresses the consistency of this stance, having supported lowering excise duties while in government and opposing their increase while in opposition. This position is heavily results-oriented, focusing on the actual consequences of excise policy.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position strongly focuses on procedural transparency and accountability, demanding the disclosure and availability of the opinion provided by the law firm consulted for advice. This is a results-based approach that emphasizes the proper documentation and sharing of materials. The stance is moderately critical of the rapporteur, who referenced an opinion that has not been shared.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political position is critical, questioning the aggressive communication surrounding the climate crisis and viewing it partly as "salesmanship" and "business." Simultaneously, there is sharp criticism of the state's hypocrisy regarding the use of natural resources, condemning the ban on oil shale and warning against the risk of groundwater contamination associated with phosphorite mining. These standpoints are strongly rooted in values and policy, focusing on honesty and environmental safety.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to enshrining the voting rights of persons with undetermined citizenship in the constitution. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of revoking voting rights from ‘gray passport’ holders, arguing that this status is linked to a lack of loyalty and insufficient ties to the state. This stance is value-based, prioritizing security and aiming to prevent the emergence of "convenience seekers" (or opportunistic residents) who gain voting rights. Furthermore, the handling of the draft legislation is criticized as insufficient and rushed, done merely to tick a box.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional to the government's policies, focusing on resistance to social and economic measures. The most fiercely opposed measures are the reduction of child benefits, the introduction of a car tax targeting large families, and the closure of schools. These positions are deeply value-based, describing the government's actions as a "world turned upside down."
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is currently directed towards ensuring the operational procedures and transparency of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The speaker strongly supports the establishment of the Rail Baltic investigative committee, citing the necessity of monitoring this multi-billion euro investment and addressing the deficiencies identified by the National Audit Office. Emphasis is placed on the importance of honesty and adherence to legal standards when executing major projects, which raises questions about the coalition's willingness to conceal information.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The politician expresses strong opposition to the car tax, focusing on its flawed implementation and the ambiguity surrounding a car theft scenario. He questions the state's ability to manage this tax fairly, emphasizing its impact on Estonian families and car owners. The focus is heavily directed towards the poor execution and unfairness of the bill.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government's policies, especially concerning the car tax, which is viewed as an impoverishing and detrimental levy. A second major focus is the opposition to the closure of the Vana-Vigala Technical and Industrial School, which is perceived as a lack of long-term planning and a disregard for regional policy. The political framework is both policy-driven (the illogical nature of the taxes) and value-based (supporting students with special educational needs (SEN) and rural areas).
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the Ministry of Education’s plan to close the Vana-Vigala school. Criticism is leveled at the state’s "tunnel vision" and its preference for prioritizing cost savings over regional policy considerations. The speaker demands that the school be kept open and the regional issue addressed, instead of simply shifting the burden of costs onto the local municipality.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is strongly oppositional, centering their focus on institutional integrity and national security. They oppose Customs Law Draft 515 (specifically the increase in penalty rates and the granting of special powers to the MTA) and demand the revocation of voting rights for Russian citizens in local government elections and the removal of the Bronze Soldier monument. The criticism targets the government's half-measures and the lack of transparency in the budget process, and is fundamentally driven by policy and values.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on the critical review of legislation, especially regarding the burdens imposed on businesses and punitive policy. It opposes the mandatory sustainability report, viewing it as an additional burden, and calls into question the unusually steep increases in fine rates. The stance is primarily policy-based and directed at scrutinizing the justification of government decisions.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is vehemently opposed (absolutely against) the government’s plan to bring foreign prisoners to Estonia, viewing it as the exploitation of Estonia by stronger European countries. This stance is powerfully critical of the government’s actions, drawing attention to the paradox of closing schools while simultaneously maintaining prison facilities. The speaker criticizes the government’s policy as short-sighted and "hype-driven."
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's incompetence and procedural errors. The main issues are the illogical distribution of ministerial jurisdictions and the questionable selection of data underlying the tax increases. Criticism is directed at the government's actions and performance, utilizing the framework of administrative errors.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to excise duty increases, particularly concerning fuel and alcohol, stressing that these will lead to a loss of tax revenue and cause consumption to shift to neighboring countries. The speaker prefers funding the state budget through economic performance, criticizing the government's new ideological direction, which focuses on reducing consumption. He views excise hikes as a historically failed policy, a mistake that has been repeated previously.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is strong opposition to the government's austerity policy, particularly in the social sphere, where critics emphasize that the cuts are disproportionate to the actual needs of the people requiring assistance. The political stance is critical and results-oriented, accusing the ministry of having tunnel vision and failing to work for the public good. The primary concerns are the extended processing times for social services and the reduction of social benefits, both of which are undermining public security and confidence.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The most salient issue is the protection of children from convicted sexual offenders, concerning which a strong, value-based opposition is adopted. The political stance is that the draft law—which would allow the Social Insurance Board to assess the right of convicted individuals to work with children—must be immediately discontinued. This position is framed by plain common sense and moral conviction.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The political focus is sharply directed at the problems of the demographic crisis and uncontrolled immigration, alongside the rising costs of specialized welfare services and the low wages paid to care workers. The speaker criticizes the government for lacking a comprehensive strategy, stressing that no one in the country is looking at the "big picture" anymore. The positions expressed are strongly critical and geared toward finding solutions to these problems.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on prioritizing the construction of four-lane roads, linking this directly to traffic safety and economic stimulus. The speaker voices strong opposition to implementing a car tax, arguing that it will age the vehicle fleet and worsen road safety. He stresses that road construction is vital for maintaining the economy's lifeblood, thereby highlighting the government's lack of action and clear priorities.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly nationalistic and conservative, focusing on security, territorial sovereignty, and historical justice. The speaker sharply criticizes recent governments for creating instability and ignoring Estonian families, which forces young people to leave the country. He demands that state institutions be steered toward a course that values the Estonian nation, which necessitates a long tenure in power for a conservative government. The removal of symbols of occupation (the Bronze Soldier) is considered important.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The most prominent topics are national defense and the circular economy. Regarding national defense, the speaker strongly supports the development of domestic ammunition production to ensure independent capability and prevent capital outflow. In the circular economy, the focus is on the problems of tire shredding and recycling in Estonia, emphasizing the need to increase domestic consumption capacity. The political framework is strongly aimed at economic independence and improving the functioning of the state.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the state’s plan to stop compensating farmers for damages caused by geese. The speaker stresses that the ministry’s budget savings (€300k–€400k) are negligible compared to the farmers’ losses, which amount to hundreds of thousands or millions of euros. This stance is clearly aimed at protecting farmers’ interests and demands that the situation be rectified, given that, from the farmers’ point of view, the situation has deteriorated.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The political focus is currently centered on issues of public trust and political ethics, particularly concerning the swift change of parties and the subsequent acquisition of a ministerial portfolio. The speaker sharply criticizes the situation, arguing that it "looks bad" and undermines the perceived integrity of politics. He demands the minister's resignation in order to relieve the pressure on the newly formed government.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The politician is in strong opposition to the car tax bill, calling it a "plan to tax the country rich" and a "stupid attempt." He promises to terminate and reverse the tax when the opportunity arises (referencing the Conservative People's Party of Estonia). The main points of emphasis are the deterioration of road safety and the burden placed on residents and entrepreneurs in rural areas. The political framework is strongly value-based (protection of rural life) and results-based (the tax is ineffective and causes damage).
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political focus is directed at the poor state of the nation's economy and finances, as well as stopping the outflow of Estonian people and businesses. The speaker is demanding concrete steps and principles from the prime ministerial candidate on how to bring back people who have left Estonia and motivate them, rather than simply replacing them with foreigners. This represents a strongly results-oriented and critical attitude toward the government's handling of the economy.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political focus is on strong opposition to the car tax, which is considered an incorrect and railroaded piece of legislation. Criticism is directed at the government's poor fiscal management and the lack of transparency in the state budget, citing the unspent 2.2 billion and the failure of the TERE budget system. The framework is results-based, first requiring the reorganization of state finances and the halting of tax increases. The political stance is strongly confrontational, demanding the termination of the car tax proceedings.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The political position centers on criticizing the government’s financial management and the accuracy of the budget. The speaker strongly objects to the 100.4 million euro error found in the previous budget and demands accountability from both the Ministry of Finance and the MKM. This approach is results-oriented, emphasizing the necessary financial competence of ministers and officials.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker's primary topics are national defense readiness and the transparency of foreign aid (Ukraine). He expresses concern that providing excessive aid may jeopardize domestic combat engineering training and calls for strict oversight to prevent the misappropriation of aid resources. The stance is results-oriented, emphasizing accountability for the effective utilization of both national defense resources and foreign assistance.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is fiercely oppositional, standing against the car tax, which is being dubbed a wealth tax and a betrayal of election promises. The criticism targets the coalition's dishonest conduct and the abrupt shift in policy, citing the reduction of child benefits as an example. The speaker emphasizes that the Reform Party acts like a weathervane when executing policy. The overall framing is heavily focused on evaluating the government's performance and the fulfillment of its pledges.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly oppositional, stressing the necessity of a vote of no confidence due to the irregularities that have occurred within the minister's portfolio. This stance is powerfully results-driven, focusing on administrative failures such as data leaks, conflicts of interest, and the loss of a national investment. The speaker considers the minister’s actions as a whole to be improper and problematic.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly anti-government, particularly on the issue of local government funding, where they criticize the imposition of mandates without corresponding state financing. The speaker opposes raising the land tax under the guise of "autonomy," calling it a way to financially choke the people. Furthermore, he heavily emphasizes the importance of maintaining food security and supporting domestic food production. The policy framework is primarily focused on criticizing the inefficiency and illogical nature of the government's actions.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the implementation of the European Union's environmental protection objectives, particularly the target for 30% strictly protected areas. They are adopting a moderately skeptical stance, requesting clarification on whether this goal pertains solely to terrestrial areas or includes marine zones as well, while simultaneously voicing apprehension regarding the potential development of a "business" model similar to the CO2 quota system. Their position is primarily directed at the specifics of policy execution and its economic ramifications.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is currently on the crisis of confidence surrounding e-voting, stressing that the 40% level of public distrust has crossed all lines. This stance is strongly opposed to the current status quo, accusing the relevant authorities and the coalition (especially the Reform Party) of a lack of political will and outright inaction. The demand to restore this lost trust is primarily framed as a failure of performance and results on the part of the government and the responsible agencies.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The most prominent topics are the extraordinary taxation of the banking sector and adherence to the procedural rules of the Riigikogu. The speaker strongly supports the taxation of banks' extraordinary profits and is critical of the government, which taxes other sectors while leaving banks untouched. The second strong position is the opposition to the government's procedural actions, which are considered "arrogance" and a violation of norms. The political framework is primarily policy-based (taxation) and procedural (legitimacy of the procedure).
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker strongly emphasizes issues of government action and accountability, particularly concerning failed IT projects. The stance is forceful and results-driven, highlighting the waste of public funds on non-operational information systems, such as the dysfunctional examination information system. The political framework is clearly aimed at criticizing the government's administrative capacity and demanding accountability.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker opposes the tax currently under discussion, viewing it primarily as a measure to fill budget gaps rather than a targeted policy initiative. His political stance is strongly critical of the government's activities, focusing particularly on the quality of their lawmaking and their disregard for established good practices. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the ethical dimension of the government's actions (hypocrisy).
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is strongly critical of the government’s justifications for its social policy, particularly regarding the income tax exemption for pensions. The speaker stresses that social policy cannot be designed around the needs of a few wealthy pensioners. Furthermore, there is a demand for auditing the use of public funds and identifying areas for cost savings, specifically by cutting the funding allocated to NGOs.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is currently on the critical problem of the veterinarian shortage, particularly concerning large animal practitioners, a situation stemming from inadequate state funding and insufficient commissioned training slots. The speaker strongly criticizes the inaction and inability of the government and the relevant ministries (HTM, Ministry of Rural Affairs) to resolve this long-known issue. The framework of the problem is results-oriented, emphasizing that the solutions are known but are simply not being implemented.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is on increasing the competitiveness and efficiency of the road transport sector, strongly supporting the allowance of longer and heavier loads. It views this as an unavoidable political step necessary to alleviate difficulties caused by government actions (such as raising the diesel excise duty) and the current economic situation. The political stance is strongly policy- and results-driven, emphasizing the need to end 20 years of inaction.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is critical and performance-driven, centered on the inefficiency of government operations. The speaker challenges Estonia's cybersecurity as a competitive advantage, citing numerous data breaches and system failures. The primary concerns are the worsening of data security and the increase in bureaucracy for businesses.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The most prominent issues are the internal atmosphere of the Riigikogu (specifically, the poor working climate of the Legal Committee) and the education policy concerning Ukrainian children. The speaker strongly opposes the officials' "overzealous desire" to forcibly turn Ukrainians into Estonians, stressing the necessity of providing instruction in the Ukrainian language. These positions are highly critical of both poor management and the policy of forced integration.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political position is clearly and unequivocally opposed to the motor vehicle tax, which is deemed detrimental to the entire society and economy, particularly in conditions of high inflation. The speaker emphasizes the government's failure in economic management, citing multiple tax increases (VAT, income tax) and accusing the administration of concealing budget balancing efforts behind the label of an environmental tax. The position is strongly value-based, focusing on honesty and the public's ability to cope.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is sharply critical of the government's actions, focusing on economic failures and the incomplete presentation of facts. The speaker stresses opposition to tax hikes (car, sugar, and VAT) and draws attention to inflation and the difficult situation facing local municipalities and schools. This position is strongly outcome-based, centering on the negative consequences of the government's policies.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional stance regarding e-elections, stressing the necessity of honest and uniform electoral processes, and criticizing institutions for ignoring warning signs. Furthermore, they are firmly in favor of abolishing expense compensations, viewing their current use as misuse, and dismissing accusations of populism as malicious rhetoric. The political framework is strongly value-driven and focuses on sharp criticism of the actions of the ruling coalition.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is centered on the transparency and ethics of communication between the judicial and executive branches. The speaker is questioning the minister's knowledge and conduct concerning the Prosecutor General's phone conversations, highlighting the necessity of courtesy and the duty to notify. This constitutes a results-oriented framework that demands the minister provide clarification regarding the protocols governing his official communications.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly critical of the actions taken by recent governments, which have led many families into financial hardship. The position strongly advocates for lowering the VAT on foodstuffs as the minimum necessary measure to assist the populace. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to maintain a consistent and determined direction in national defense, viewing indecision as worse than a bad decision. The political framework is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of government actions and offering concrete political solutions.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly critical of the government's actions, which have driven local municipalities (KOV) into a severe financial situation, forcing them to close schools and kindergartens. The main emphasis is placed on unfunded mandates and tax increases, demanding that the government provide a concrete, constructive plan and allocate financial resources to support the KOVs. The criticism is directed at the effectiveness of the government's performance and its negative impact on local services.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the instability of the government and the declining sense of security among families. The speaker opposes new taxes (such as the car tax and the sugar tax) and criticizes the cuts to family benefits, viewing this as an undervaluation of family values. The political framework is primarily results-oriented, highlighting the negative consequences of the government’s actions (emigration, uncertainty).
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The political position is moderately pro-nuclear ("sympathetic"), but the emphasis is placed on demanding concrete action plans and timelines from the Ministry of Climate. A crucial issue is energy security, which requires the continued maintenance of oil shale reserves and the allocation of necessary funds for this purpose. The focus is on policy implementation and the effectiveness of government action.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly value-based and proactive, emphasizing the protection of women's rights and the security of the cultural sphere. The speaker strongly supports the draft legislation concerning the prohibition of face-covering garments and criticizes the coalition's proposal to reject it. They stress the necessity of looking toward the future to prevent potential social and security issues.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to centralization, sharply criticizing the migration of services (especially schools) from rural areas to major population centers. The speaker demands concrete positive steps from the government to ensure access to education and quality of life for rural residents. The policy framing is results-based, emphasizing negative trends and the absence of a positive message.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker strongly endorses this specific bill, deeming it a highly reasonable and necessary measure to support domestic producers facing economic hardship. The political stance is sharply critical of the government, which has failed to ensure the agricultural sector receives the promised capital. The core focus remains on policy efficacy and the value-driven protection of domestic output.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on criticizing the government’s decision not to impose a tax on banks’ windfall profits, generated as a result of the rising Euribor rate. The speaker casts doubt on the government’s justification that avoiding this bank tax will guarantee better loan terms and accessibility for entrepreneurs. The stance is heavily focused on matters of economic efficiency and equity.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker strongly emphasizes the need for better labeling and separation of insect-based foods on store shelves, thereby safeguarding consumer freedom of choice. The political stance is value-driven and cautious, expressing concern that the current discussion could potentially lead to the mandatory consumption of insects in Estonia. This position is focused on protecting consumer awareness and preserving the traditional diet.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The political platform is heavily focused on ensuring national security, advocating for restrictions on property acquisition by Russian citizens who do not possess a residence permit, citing the war of aggression in Ukraine. This position is fundamentally value-based, stressing that such conduct must not be tolerated. Furthermore, the speaker sharply criticizes the government’s policy of exempting foreign banks from taxation while simultaneously putting pressure on domestic financial institutions.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the government's labor policy, stressing the necessity of addressing the 55,892 unemployed individuals before increasing immigration severalfold. The principle of ministerial responsibility is also highlighted, demanding that the Prime Minister account for the statements made by other ministers (Tiit Riisalo). The political framework is clearly directed at criticizing the government's actions and performance.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
In political activity, strong emphasis is placed on national preparedness and the transparency of strategic reserve management, particularly regarding the evaluation of the Estonian Stock Center's operations. Another crucial topic is guaranteeing food security and opposing the government's practice of avoiding substantive discussion of opposition-submitted bills. These positions are heavily focused on ensuring state functionality and security for times of crisis, tending to be results-oriented and critical.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is twofold: strong procedural criticism aimed at the government for failing to process opposition bills, and clear support for a specific excise duty reduction bill. The criticism targets the efficiency and integrity of the government's actions in the legislative process, accusing them of stifling processes. Simultaneously, there is active support for reducing the excise duty rate on shale oil fuel.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's infrastructure policy, particularly the Rail Baltic project and the proposed car tax. The speaker sharply criticizes the underfunding of road infrastructure, which has led to the sector's collapse, and highlights the impracticality of Rail Baltic. The political framework is primarily results-oriented, stressing the government's short-sightedness and inefficiency while demanding that national defense be prioritized. He emphasizes that the public's concern regarding restrictions on stove heating is entirely justified.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position strongly focuses on tax relief for both individuals and legal entities, justifying this approach by citing high inflation and the challenging economic situation. The stance is heavily policy- and results-driven, underscoring the necessity of leaving more disposable income in people’s hands. Furthermore, the speaker emphasizes procedural accountability and demands clear answers from ministers, criticizing the lack of clarity in communication.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly value-based and assertive, emphasizing the need to immediately remove monuments that cause offense, while criticizing previous "subservience." A second key focus is the alleged political abuse of the legal system, where legal proceedings are utilized as a method for punishing political opponents. The speaker supports the adoption of a specific draft decision to achieve the desired outcomes.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker’s political stance is heavily rooted in social policy and values, directly opposing the ideological direction of the coalition. The central issue is the reduction of child benefits, which is viewed as a serious problem and an affront to families. The speaker is actively supporting legislative amendments to find a solution to the current situation.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is directed both at the procedural correctness of the legislation (the timely submission of the draft bill) and the historical credibility of the tax policy. The speaker questions the Reform Party's long-term intentions regarding VAT increases, referencing the 2009 decisions and linking them to current or future hikes. The framing is heavily results-oriented and serves to undermine credibility.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly critical of the direction of the government's green transition policy, labeling it a "green transition frenzy" that is driving industry out of Estonia and Europe. It advocates for tax uniformity, arguing that the VAT rate for the press should be equal to the general VAT rate (22%), opposing the established reduced rate (9%). The political framework is results-oriented, focusing on the negative economic consequences of political decisions.