Session Profile: Rene Kokk
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-02-21
Political Position
The speaker strongly endorses this specific bill, deeming it a highly reasonable and necessary measure to support domestic producers facing economic hardship. The political stance is sharply critical of the government, which has failed to ensure the agricultural sector receives the promised capital. The core focus remains on policy efficacy and the value-driven protection of domestic output.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of economics and agriculture, citing studies by the Estonian Institute of Economic Research that show a decline in Estonian domestic goods on the market. Specific terms are used, such as "capital availability," "bank tax," and reference is made to the slow response of the Rural Development Foundation (MES).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone of the speech is anxious and urgent, emphasizing that the agricultural sector is "in deep, deep trouble" and highlighting the severe financial pressure faced by people due to inflation. The style is formal, addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur, and relies on logical arguments (cause-and-effect relationships in the economy) and rhetorical questions to affirm the necessity of the draft bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data is available for only two speeches given during a single plenary session (2024-02-21). Information regarding the frequency of appearances, rhythm, or other activity patterns is missing.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed against the government and the prime minister because promises regarding the improvement of capital accessibility for farmers have not been fulfilled, which constitutes a failure of policy. Additionally, the representative leader of the organization is being criticized for attempting to claim the opposite of the reasons behind the farmers' turnout. The criticism is substantive and focuses on inaction and slow reaction times.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is seeking confirmation and agreement from the rapporteur regarding the reasonableness and necessity of the draft bill, employing questions such as "do you agree" and "what do you think." This indicates a desire to achieve consensus and support for the legislative proposal currently under consideration.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily weighted toward the national level, centering on the domestic producer, the availability of Estonian goods, and the crisis facing the agricultural sector. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of supporting local food production and ensuring access to high-quality food.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports intervention aimed at bolstering domestic production, arguing that inflation and high energy prices are compelling consumers to favor foreign goods. Furthermore, the current financial policy is criticized for failing to ensure that capital flows into the agricultural sector, highlighting the persistent issue of capital accessibility.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data. The discussions focus on economic and agricultural issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative priority is supporting the bill currently under consideration, which aims to improve market access for domestic producers and assist the agricultural sector. The speaker is an active and staunch supporter of this bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed