Agenda Profile: Rene Kokk
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position expresses strong support for reforming the oversight of party financing, specifically favoring the transfer of control functions to the National Audit Office (Bill 599 SE). This stance is driven by the conviction that the current situation surrounding the ERJK (Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing) has become utterly untenable, resulting in strongly performance-based criticism. The speaker urgently calls for the bill to be processed further and refined.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the oversight of political party financing and the related legislation (599 SE). They use specific examples of media coverage and advertising by politicians (Jüri Ratas, Võrklaev) to illustrate the absurdity and complexity of the current control system. They highlight problems related to both the revenue and expenditure sides in the context of campaigns.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is insistent, emotional, and critical, repeatedly emphasizing that the situation is "completely absurd." The speaker employs anecdotal examples and personal references (Jüri Ratas, Juku-Kalle, Enn Eesmaa) to illustrate the absurdity of the situation. He addresses his colleagues with a direct appeal to use their heads and not derail the bill, balancing logic with emotional persuasion.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the legislative debate in the Riigikogu, speaking during the first reading of Draft Bill 599 SE. He/She directly addresses colleagues present both in the chamber and those joining remotely, stressing the need for immediate action. This course of action is linked to supporting the proceedings of the specific draft bill.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the current operation and procedural methods of the Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing (ERJK), which are considered nonsensical. There is also indirect criticism aimed at colleagues who wish to obstruct the processing of the draft bill, urging them not to derail it. The criticism is both procedural and forceful.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative approach is persuasive and appealing, asking colleagues to proceed with the draft bill and improve it. The speaker points to a cross-party consensus regarding the existence of the problem, noting that individuals from other political parties also recognize the seriousness of the issue. He emphasizes openness to debate and amendments.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on reforming the oversight body for political party financing, supporting the continued processing of draft bill 599 SE (which transfers oversight authority to the National Audit Office). The speaker is a strong proponent of this initiative, emphasizing the necessity of improving the law rather than derailing it through a vote.
3 Speeches Analyzed