By Plenary Sessions: Mait Klaassen
Total Sessions: 32
Fully Profiled: 32
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The objection is aimed at the presenter's lack of focus, criticizing the fact that the topic of human capital was left unaddressed. The criticism is policy-based and low-intensity, having been presented in the form of a question.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism directed at other political forces. The speaker relays a colleague's (Rain Epler) concern regarding the risk of disclosing business secrets and national security information, but this was addressed with a substantive explanation, referencing a case-by-case approach.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the investment strategy put forward by the government or a minister, which is deemed inadequate for eliminating regional disparities. The opposition is policy-driven, centering on the inefficient allocation of investments.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Lack of data
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition targets the practice of imposing nature conservation restrictions on private forests without involving the owner, thus criticizing the procedural injustice inherent in the process. The criticism is aimed at the practices implemented by certain government agencies or the government itself, rather than specific individuals.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is directed at systemic inefficiency and an unspecified individual or group who is "hindering the advancement of the integrated curriculum." The opposition is policy-based, focusing on poor results and demanding the removal of obstacles.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the justification of regulatory decisions (e.g., the 20 km limit in maritime areas) and the process of preparing the draft legislation. The speaker asks whether institutions and schools were consulted regarding the timing change, pointing to a possible deficiency in the preparation of the draft. The criticism is procedural and policy-based.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the inadequacy of the analysis of a specific draft bill and the figures underlying it; it is not personal. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, questioning the measure's international legality and its actual impact on freight transport.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is posing a critical question to the government concerning cuts to higher education funding, thereby casting doubt on the new government's plans and its ability to honor previous commitments. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the reduction of promised funding amidst a difficult economic climate.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
No direct oppositional stance is expressed toward political opponents. The criticism is directed at verifying the adequacy of the government’s (minister’s) operational protocols and international agreements given the current security situation.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversaries are the opposition parties, who face criticism for their repeated assertions regarding the unconstitutionality of the legislation. The speaker acknowledges that this falls within the opposition's mandate, but scrutinizes the accuracy and necessity of these claims.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct personal confrontation, but legal objections raised by the Riigikogu Legal and Analysis Department regarding the infringement of legitimate expectation and the fundamental right to property are being addressed. These objections are mitigated by the Ministry of Climate's stance that the infringements resulting from the suspension outweigh the potential damages arising from unrealized rights. Businesses (e.g., VKG) declined to submit their positions if the deadline for the restrictions remains permanent.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary conflict is with the Isamaa faction, whose amendments seeking to repeal the motor vehicle tax were rejected, citing the government’s action plan and budget. Proposals put forth by Riigikogu member Raimond Kaljulaid to restrict light personal mobility devices were also rejected on procedural grounds, as they were not directly related to the bill being discussed and required further analysis.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the existing economic model and its consequences (i.e., constant firefighting), which fails to move the country forward. Strong opposition to the use of biomass is also criticized, as it prevents the replacement of fossil carbon. The criticism is aimed at policies and procedures, not individuals.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
No direct opposition is voiced; instead, constructive and critical questions are raised concerning the policy's implementation. The criticism targets bureaucratic processes (the complexity of documentation) and potential deficiencies in state planning when it comes to protecting valuable land.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Direct personal opposition is not expressed, but criticism is cited regarding the 800-euro state fee. Those raising the questions believe this fee will not solve the problem of illegal operators and may push people toward seeking alternatives. Furthermore, concerns are raised that the high charge disproportionately affects less affluent vehicle owners. The criticism focuses on the policy's effectiveness and social equity.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the activities of the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), specifically against the new practice of unannounced home visits. The opposition is procedural and centers on the question of the limits of a state institution's activities, which infringes upon the constitutional rights of citizens.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker himself does not express opposition, but reports that two members of the committee voted against placing the draft bill on the plenary agenda and concluding its first reading. The opposition primarily relates to the socio-economic impact of the bill on local governments and the legitimate expectations of businesses after 2026.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
There is too little data.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker dismisses the anonymous fear or objection concerning the malicious use of the proposal, stating unequivocally that he does not harbor that concern. Direct political opponents or groups are not criticized; rather, potential opposition is handled strictly on the level of argument.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic of Estonia, whose policy direction and inaction regarding budget consolidation are being called into question. The criticism is politically motivated and intense, demanding a forecast regarding the timing of a potential economic catastrophe if the government fails to take action.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is voicing opposition to the proposed amendment, which they argue creates the potential for excessive financial oversight of individuals' economic activities. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and its potential constitutional infringement, rather than at specific persons.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the funding policies for higher education set by the government or the Ministry of Finance, deeming the allocation of 2 million euros insufficient and essentially a non-solution. The opposition is rooted in both policy and finance, centered on the argument that merely substituting funds will not lead to any real improvement for the university.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
There is no direct opposition, but criticism is directed at a procedural deficiency—the insufficient justification of support measures with social research. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the fundamental principles underlying the government's investment decisions, based on suspicions that there is a lack of sufficient strategic planning and foundational research. The criticism is policy-driven and framed as a question, demanding confirmation regarding the long-term validity of these decisions.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at those who wish to restrict the rights of electoral alliances and grant greater power to political parties, criticizing their optimism regarding the disappearance of political maneuvering. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact of restricting local participation.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no opposition in the sense of criticizing direct opponents; rather, this is an attempt to correct the terminology and focus prevalent in the debate, which concentrates too heavily on the "car tax." The criticism is aimed at the framing of the policy itself.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the speaker who presented claims before the environmental commission. The criticism is substantive and evidence-based, accusing the opponent of disregarding the fundamental principles of atmospheric physics and drawing flawed conclusions.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.