By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Kivimägi

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, centering on logical arguments and concrete financial data. The speaker presents their stance factually, challenging opponents on the accuracy of their calculations, and concludes their statement with a verifying question.

The style is brief, formal, and strictly procedural, focusing on the smooth running of the session (e.g., "Thank you very much! I have no further questions for you.").

The style is formal and respectful, starting with strong praise for the Chancellor of Justice's professionalism and precise use of language. When presenting the problem, the tone becomes personally concerned and intense ("it actually deeply bothers me"), while simultaneously emphasizing the apparent smallness of the issue ("a small nuance").

The speaker's style is extremely formal and respectful, addressing both the members of the Riigikogu and the ministers with deference. The tone is neutral and focuses purely on announcing procedural steps, commencing the information session and initiating the attendance check.

The speaking style is authoritative and procedural, sometimes impatient, expressing discomfort and concern about wasted time ("How long are we going to keep beating this drum here?"). It appeals strongly to logic, rules, and traditions, employing few emotional techniques. The tone is direct and demands progress.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and interrogative, addressing high officials directly ("Honorable Chief Justice!"). A logical and analytical approach dominates, presenting three specific questions concerning the necessity of improving the legal system. The tone is one of concern, particularly regarding the public sense of justice, but the questions are posed cautiously and apologetically ("I sincerely apologize for even asking such a question").

The speech is extremely brief, formal, and direct, utilizing a polite form of address ("Honorable Chair!"). The style is neutral and focuses on expressing clear consent.

The style of the speech is informative, humorous, and personal, making it appropriate for a Christmas event, and it contains direct and firm promises. The speaker employs self-deprecating humor (specifically, their lack of skill in writing poetry) and emphasizes sparing the audience by choosing a simple and straightforward communication style. They also use humor to comment on the similarity between the Riigikogu board and a family.

The speaker's rhetorical style is extremely laconic and direct, confining itself only to a straightforward answer to the question posed. The delivery is neutral and formal, emphasizing the determination in accepting the nomination.

The rhetoric is formal and respectful, addressing the President of the Bank of Estonia directly ("Honorable President of the Bank of Estonia"). The style is analytical and interrogative, deliberately framing the second question as provocative to force a contrast between tax increases and spending cuts. The appeal is purely logical and policy-centric.

The style of the address is extremely formal and respectful, directed toward the Speaker of the Riigikogu. The expression is brief, direct, and declarative, focusing on the functional message.

Insufficient data