By Plenary Sessions: Signe Kivi
Total Sessions: 33
Fully Profiled: 33
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker criticizes the current administrative structure of language policy and the diffusion of responsibility, but does not directly criticize any political opponent or group.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the bill's drafters or the committee, who have failed to adequately address the substantive objection raised by the President concerning legal ambiguity. The opposition is both procedural and substantive, as the implementation of an ambiguous law could violate fundamental rights.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition, but the speaker offers external criticism regarding the provisions of the draft bill concerning the salary standard for unqualified teachers. The criticism is policy-driven and moderate, focusing on the unintended consequences of the bill within the context of the minimum wage for teachers.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the departments falling under the ministry's administrative area. They are being criticized for failing to deliver on promises and for improper handling of affairs in their communications with UNESCO. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural infractions related to a project approved by the Riigikogu.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the rapporteur of the draft bill and the procedure for its compilation, casting doubt on the reliability and anonymity of the expert sources presented. The opposition is procedural and calls for greater transparency, noting that the individual in question may be a professional from a different specialty.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The direct political opponent is not criticized, but doubt and concern are expressed regarding the attitudes and values of persons with undetermined citizenship and citizens of the Russian Federation, which differ from those of Estonian citizens. Their desire to obtain citizenship is presented as a potential security threat.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the inaction of the Centre Party faction because its members are not participating in the work of the Environmental Committee. This is viewed as a procedural shortcoming, which is contrary to good practice and leaves their voice unheard in the legislative process.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Missing data
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct opposition to the presenter's objective, but criticizes the proposal's narrow focus, which addresses the issue only for women and the medical sector. The criticism is aimed at the scope and wording of the policy, not personal.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker avoids direct criticism or opposition, instead offering an alternative procedural solution to the topic raised by the presenter. The focus is on finding a resolution through existing institutions, rather than confronting political positions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct confrontation expressed; instead, criticism is leveled against the current budget submission procedure, which fails to detail sufficiently the funding for core cultural institutions. The criticism is procedural and aimed at achieving greater transparency.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The criticism targets the inadequacy of the bill's content and wording, as it may fail to prevent severe social problems. Furthermore, the procedural situation is indirectly criticized, which could impede necessary amendments during the second reading. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The confrontation is directed against the speaker, whose criticism of the Reform Party is considered unfair and insulting. The speaker vigorously defends the women, mothers, and grandmothers of their faction and calls into question the effectiveness of the solution proposed by the opposing side (a problem committee) in resolving the crisis.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is a complete absence of any criticism or opposition towards other parties or political groups. Not enough data
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Kivi indirectly criticizes the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM) for its protracted delays in addressing language issues, noting that the ministry has consistently prioritized comprehensive analysis (VTK) over concrete legislative drafts. He also takes a stand against the societal attitude that provides excessive translated information and fosters a parallel society, thereby encouraging individuals to shirk responsibility for language acquisition.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No direct political confrontation is being expressed, but there is criticism directed at the hesitation and fears surrounding heritage and nature conservation restrictions related to new construction. The speaker refutes claims that construction is impossible near a UNESCO listed site, citing examples where compromises were found (e.g., Vabaduse Square, Kaarli Puiestee 8). They wish to avoid a new "culture war," preferring discussion instead.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker expresses no opposition to the minister; instead, they commend him and his work. Criticism is absent, and the focus is on the difficulties of policy implementation and the evaluation of results.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
It does not express direct opposition, but rather neutrally references the conflicting viewpoints presented in the committee, such as the discussion that arose between Jaak Valge and Margit Sutrop regarding the rigidity of the draft law and the reliability of monitoring. It also highlights the stance of the Language Inspectorate (Keeleamet), which emphasizes institutions' freedom of decision concerning translation, contrasting with the draft law's rigidity.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
No direct opposition is being voiced, but it is acknowledged that the draft bill has generated disputes and disagreements regarding the procedure for supplementing the list of cultural buildings. The criticism is rather procedural, concerning the rights of the submitters of projects that were excluded from the approved list.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the rapporteur of the draft bill, questioning whether the material presented is specific enough or if it simply duplicates the prior work done by the Minister of Education and Research. There are no personal attacks; the focus remains strictly on procedural and substantive review to ensure that unnecessary work is avoided.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker takes the floor to defend the Reform Party faction, refuting the implicit accusation that they are unconcerned about the declining birth rate. There is no direct opposition or political attack; instead, this is framed as a defensive clarification.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No direct confrontation is expressed, but the speaker defends a previous decision, which suggests possible criticism regarding the choice of the funding method. The criticism being addressed is procedural and concerns the infringement of rights.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition; the speaker neutrally addresses previous hesitations regarding the amendment of the Cultural Endowment Act, but does not criticize any specific opposing party. The focus is on presenting solutions, not on confrontation.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the failure to consider the Ministry of Culture's proposals on the coordination sheet, and more broadly, at the government's taxation policy, which creates unequal conditions. The opposition is policy-based, centering on how this taxation harms owners and restorers of vintage vehicles. The confrontation is of moderate intensity, presented in the form of a question.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient Data. (The address does not contain criticism or opposing viewpoints, but is aimed at obtaining clarifications and assurances from the government.)
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition is focused on the speed at which the changes proposed by the bill's submitter would take effect, a timeline considered too rapid for the universities. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, calling into question the necessity of repeatedly submitting the draft legislation.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the glorification of Soviet power and occupation, and its association with Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine. The criticism is directed at ideological symbols and their current use, rather than specific political opponents.