Session Profile: Tanel Kiik
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-03-27
Political Position
He criticizes the judicial reform, questioning how it is possible that 33 years after the constitution was adopted, new constitutional requirements are suddenly being discovered. He also asks whether these changes will actually make court proceedings faster and fairer for the public.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the field of judicial reform and the legal system by specifically asking about the change in the interpretation of the constitution over the course of 33 years. It also demonstrates an understanding of the balance between the speed and fairness of judicial proceedings.
Rhetorical Style
Insufficient data. The only speech is a brief courtesy statement, which does not allow for the assessment of the rhetorical style.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
A single instance of consent for providing written authorization. A short formal reply.
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data. The speech contains no criticism, resistance, or opposing viewpoints.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
He/She submits an interpellation alongside other Social Democrats, thereby demonstrating the faction's unified stance. The focus is on finding constructive solutions for enhancing security in care homes.
Regional Focus
Addressed issues of gender equality, focusing on nationwide changes. It did not concentrate on specific regions.
Economic Views
He/She addressed issues of gender equality, linking them to the potential for economic growth. He/She supported the creation of equal opportunities as an economic advantage.
Social Issues
It focuses primarily on issues of gender equality, supporting requirements for gender balance in the governing bodies of listed companies. It sharply criticizes the attitude of more conservative political parties toward the equal treatment of women, citing specific statistical data regarding the gender composition of the parties themselves. It emphasizes that balanced leadership delivers better results.
Legislative Focus
Insufficient data. The speech is limited merely to giving consent, without mentioning specific legislative priorities or initiatives.
1 Speeches Analyzed