Session Profile: Tanel Kiik

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

2024-04-18

Political Position
The speaker adopts a methodological and analytical approach to the issue of nuclear energy, emphasizing the need for a fact-based debate. He supports the view that Estonia should compare itself to countries facing similar choices regarding energy development, rather than those that are phasing out existing nuclear energy. The approach is focused on policy development rather than ideology.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong understanding of the methodology and comparative analysis within the nuclear energy debate, emphasizing that Estonia should benchmark itself against countries considering the adoption of nuclear energy. It highlights the importance of an analytical approach in the energy policy discussion.
Rhetorical Style
Adopts a critical yet constructive tone in the nuclear energy debate. Recommends a more fact-based approach and the use of more appropriate comparisons. The style is analytical and balanced, avoiding emotional rhetoric.
Activity Patterns
He/She spoke once during the nuclear energy debate, inquiring about the methodological approach used in the selection of comparison countries. He/She emphasized the importance of factual accuracy in the discussion.
Opposition Stance
The speaker raises questions regarding the framing of the nuclear energy debate, suggesting that similar countries should be compared. The opposition is constructive, seeking a more factually precise discussion concerning the introduction of nuclear energy.
Collaboration Style
Offered constructive cooperation on nuclear energy matters, emphasizing the need for a fact-based debate. Called for a balanced approach.
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker addresses the economic aspects of nuclear energy, pointing to the necessity of analyzing the economic consequences when making energy choices. He emphasizes that, in the Estonian context, we must take into account the costs of building capacity from scratch, rather than the impacts associated with shutting down existing infrastructure.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The inquiry concerns the framing of the nuclear energy debate, suggesting comparisons be drawn with similar countries. The focus is on ensuring the discussion remains fact-based.