Session Profile: Tanel Kiik
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-02-20
Political Position
The speaker adopts a very strong and unequivocal position regarding the support of Ukraine against Russian aggression. They emphasize that the only acceptable solution is Ukraine's total victory over Russia and call for the free world to significantly step up its efforts. This stance is value-driven, centered on protecting social justice, human rights, and democratic values.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a deep awareness of the situation regarding the war in Ukraine, based on personal visits to the country and specific observations. Uses emotionally impactful examples (the memorial for fallen children in Kyiv, school buildings reduced to rubble) and refers to historical experiences with Russia. Demonstrates a good understanding of international politics and geopolitical processes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses strongly emotional and fiery rhetoric, combining personal experiences with political messages. Relies heavily on storytelling (personal visits to Ukraine) and moral arguments. Repeatedly employs a quote from Edmund Burke and emphasizes moral obligations. The style is solemn and evocative, aiming for the emotional engagement of the audience.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Mentions two personal visits to Ukraine during the war, demonstrating active international engagement. Refers to the intention to participate in the February 24th national flag-raising ceremony, indicating involvement in state events. More specific details regarding patterns of activity are not evident from this speech.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Adopts a categorically hostile position towards Russia and personally towards Putin, labeling Russia the "empire of evil" and accusing it of war crimes. It also criticizes "naive politicians" who fail to grasp Russia's true objectives. It completely rules out any compromise with Russia and demands forceful resistance.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It stresses the need for joint international action, mentioning the cooperation of Europe, the United States, and the free world. It calls for collective responsibility and concerted action in supporting Ukraine. The style of cooperation is coalitional, aimed at achieving broader international unity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Focuses primarily on international issues, particularly the Russia-Ukraine war and its impact on Europe. It mentions Estonia as part of the wider free world, but does not address specific local or regional issues. The focus is clearly on the geopolitical level.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker calls for economic aid to Ukraine but does not state specific positions on economic policy, taxes, spending, or regulation. The necessity of financial donations and economic support is emphasized, but broader economic views are not evident from the speech.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Strongly focuses on issues of human rights, social justice, and child protection within the context of Ukraine. It emphasizes children's right to a safe childhood and condemns the deportation of children as a war crime. It addresses poverty and social protection in an international context, but does not touch upon local social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Supports the Riigikogu's statement of support for Ukraine, but does not mention specific legislative initiatives, bills, or amendments. It focuses more on supporting political statements and declarations than on concrete legislative action. It emphasizes that words must be accompanied by deeds.
2 Speeches Analyzed