Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
Addresses the Minister of Social Affairs regarding the standard of living and supports raising the subsistence level. Expresses concern that the public’s sense of security is significantly lower than in neighboring countries and that social stratification is growing.
Topic Expertise
He/She demonstrated knowledge of economic policy and consumer behavior, citing differences in confidence levels among various income groups.
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs an analytical and data-driven approach, drawing on specific research conducted by the Institute of Economic Research and comparisons with other European Union member states. The rhetoric is formal and structured, prioritizing logical arguments over emotional appeals. The delivery is moderate and inquisitive, utilizing a question to clarify the minister's stance on a specific fiscal policy measure (the reduction of VAT on food products).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She asked questions about livelihood and the Arms Act, showing interest in both social and security policy. Mental health aspects were emphasized.
Opposition Stance
They criticized the government's amendments to the gun law, expressing concern over potential negative consequences. They emphasized that broader access to firearms could increase risks.
Collaboration Style
He/She inquired about livelihood and a sense of security, offering constructive input into the tax policy discussion. The focus was on fact-based arguments and concrete proposals.
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
Economic Views
Asks about welfare policy and expresses concern regarding people's sense of security. Supports measures that improve the situation of low-wage earners.
Social Issues
He/She inquired about people's livelihood, stressing the need to support low-income earners. He/She supported fiscal measures aimed at reducing inequality.
Legislative Focus
He submitted a query regarding the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, criticizing the government's unilateral approach. He emphasized the need for tripartite negotiations between trade unions, employers, and the state.