Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Third reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
It supports the introduction of a security tax but emphasizes the need for a fair tax system. It argues that the tax burden should fall on the wealthier segment of society and supports the implementation of a progressive income tax.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrated a deep understanding of tax policy and security financing, discussing the necessity of a security tax and the need for a fairer tax system.
Rhetorical Style
He/She employs principled argumentation regarding tax policy; the tone is persuasive and visionary.
Activity Patterns
He/She delivered a lengthy address regarding the security levy, emphasizing the need for an equitable tax system. He/She utilized the additional time for a thorough presentation of arguments.
Opposition Stance
The subject criticized the government's tax policy, arguing that it exacerbates inequality and disproportionately burdens low-income earners. They called for a fairer tax system and the implementation of a progressive income tax.
Collaboration Style
Supports the specific bill, but demands broader changes to the tax system. Shows a willingness to cooperate toward a fairer policy.
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
Economic Views
They supported the implementation of the security tax as a necessary step, but emphasized the need for a more equitable tax system. They called for the introduction of a progressive income tax and wealth taxes.
Social Issues
There is not enough data
Legislative Focus
Supported the amendments to the Health Services Organization Act, particularly the streamlining of primary care terminology and the introduction of the concept of health centers into the law.