Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
Political Position
The individual inquires about the possibility of reassessing the restriction on working with children in cases involving pedophilic offenses. They express concern regarding the lack of legal clarity and request an adjournment to seek clarification from the ministry.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the system of legal procedures and restrictions on working with children. Highlights the need for legal clarity in complex issues.
Rhetorical Style
It employs a procedural approach, requiring clarity on legal issues. The tone is constructive and focused on accuracy.
Activity Patterns
A procedural question concerning the restriction on working with children. A brief clarifying question regarding the substance of the law.
Opposition Stance
The speaker asks about child protection issues and requests the minister to comment on the Prosecutor's Office's stance in the Pihlakodu case. The opposition is critical of the Prosecutor's Office's decision.
Collaboration Style
Offered constructive criticism regarding the restrictions on working with children, calling for clarification. The need for legal certainty was emphasized.
Regional Focus
The speaker is inquiring about child protection issues nationwide. Regional differences are not emphasized.
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker demonstrates a strong interest in child protection issues, particularly concerning the context of pedophile crimes. They are demanding clarity regarding the draft legislation that addresses the possibility of reassessing restrictions on working with children, stressing the necessity of achieving legal clarity before any decisions are made. The speaker presumes that the Riigikogu (Parliament) is morally aligned on matters of child protection.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
He raised a procedural question concerning the reassessment of the restriction on working with children, demanding clarity on whether it applies specifically to convictions for pedophilia. He called for a recess to obtain clarification.