By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid
Total Sessions: 36
Fully Profiled: 36
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is directed at the commission's decision to reject the proposal for lowering food prices. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency in the procedure, demanding that the rapporteur disclose the reasons for the rejection and the names of those who voted. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and its procedural legitimacy.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is with the government and its ministers, who are being criticized for shifting responsibility, poor public image, and insufficient budget transparency. The criticism is directed at the quality of the government's actions and procedural shortcomings, rather than being personal.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main targets are the tax policies of the current government (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), which are being criticized for favoring the wealthy. Strong criticism is also directed at the Centre Party, which is accused of both making the decision to cut the rescue squad budget in 2021 and engaging in irresponsible fiscal populism. The criticism is predominantly policy-based (focusing on the budget and taxes) and is particularly intense when aimed at the Centre Party.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
No direct confrontation is voiced, but the speaker addresses economic objections raised by players in the construction and real estate development sector. The criticism is mildly aimed, hoping the business community understands the security risks and necessary changes. A justifiably raised question regarding the speed of processing the draft bill is also answered.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Defence (Hanno Pevkur) and the Ministry of Defence, accusing them of delay, incompetence, and avoidance of responsibility. The criticism is both procedural (delay in implementing acts) and political (lowering the language requirements for the head of RKIK), suggesting the possibility that favorable conditions are being created for a specific candidate. Shifting responsibility onto the Government Office is being called a "very strange approach."
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation or criticism of opponents, but the speaker is skeptical about the economic outcome of the initiative. The criticism is directed at the substance of the policy, not at individuals or procedures.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the government coalition (the Reform Party and Estonia 200) and Minister of Defense Hanno Pevkur, whose resignation is being demanded in order to restore confidence in the defense sector. Criticism is aimed both at procedural shortcomings (the minister leaving the chamber) and at substantive financial management and political pressure. Earlier Reform Party politicians (Jürgen Ligi) are also being criticized for opposing the 5% defense spending target.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who present emotional assessments regarding regional development instead of concrete figures. He/She is also skeptical of economic circles that promote immigration using the labor shortage argument, while ignoring its long-term socio-economic cost.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the governing coalition and specific ministers (the Minister of Defense), who are being criticized for management failures, delays, and systemic irregularities in the use of funds. The criticism is intense and focuses on political accountability, also accusing the coalition of attempting to "cover up" serious suspicions of legal wrongdoing.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The resistance is aimed at the actions of the government and the minister, specifically criticizing the organization of the land planning process and the volatility of environmental policy. The criticism is directed at political instability, which harms the investment environment, and the loss of trust in the state. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker criticizes the current state of the debate, calling it one-sided and absurd. He is pushing back against those who, in his estimation, are expanding the scope of the draft legislation to encompass unreasonable topics, aiming to steer the discussion back toward the facts.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Defense and the Ministry of Defense, who are accused of unacceptable procedural delays in approving implementing acts. The criticism is performance-based and is escalating into a demand for the minister's dismissal ("red card"). The Prime Minister is indirectly accused, the implication being that the Ministry of Defense has let him down through its inaction.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets the reforms initiated by the Reform Party and the government, which are widely seen as detrimental to the situation of workers. Opponents' motives are under suspicion, with suggestions that they are pursuing the wrong course of action, either due to ignorance or "in the interests of their sponsors." The criticism is rooted in policy and values, challenging the Reform Party's previous arguments.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the government (the executive branch), which is accused of providing insufficient and opaque funding for national defense. The criticism is policy- and performance-driven, centered on the government's failure to provide the navy with the necessary physical resources and preparedness required to execute new missions. Responses are being demanded regarding the government's actual readiness and schedule.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the leadership of the Ministry of Defence and the Prime Minister's support for the minister (Hanno Pevkur). The criticism is performance-based, emphasizing the loss of trust due to the scandal and demanding a reassessment of management decisions.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The main confrontation is aimed at the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance (Ligi). The criticism is procedural and concerns the minister's suitability in a security context, citing his alleged repeated removal from sessions. The attack is intense, demanding a public explanation from the Prime Minister as to whether he has repeatedly instructed Ligi to sort out his clearance.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who oppose the rapid processing of the draft bill, suggesting they wait for a more comprehensive local government organization bill. The speaker rejects this stance, stressing that a solution is needed immediately because existing legal mechanisms are insufficient for proactive intervention. He/She also addresses claims that current law is not being applied effectively enough, arguing that greater specificity is required in the legislation.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who stands accused of procedural failures and internal political score-settling. The speaker also sharply criticizes the major Western powers for pursuing a "cynical policy" regarding Ukraine, one that diverges from their publicly declared objectives. He suggests the Foreign Minister should resign from the government if he dislikes being associated with the socialists.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu and the Isamaa faction, whose accusations are dismissed. The criticism is intense and policy-based, focusing on alleged failures of omission made during Isamaa's time in government, such as low volumes of defense procurements and agreeing to the partial relinquishment of Estonian territory during defense planning. The opponent's draft bill is rejected due to its weak substance.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is with the EKRE faction (Mart Helme, Varro Vooglaid), who are criticized both personally (for their lame and idiotic attention-seeking) and politically. The opposition’s actions (such as voting against JEF) are viewed as directly contrary to the interests of Estonian security and independence. The speaker accuses the opponents of spreading baseless garbage and repeating Kremlin narratives.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are Isamaa and EKRE, who are accused of hypocrisy (an inability to solve the issue while in government) and incompetence (submitting draft legislation that contradicts the constitution). The criticism is intense and targets both the political substance and procedural correctness, specifically accusing Isamaa of holding the Riigikogu hostage.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
As the opposition, the Isamaa Party and Urmas Reinsalu are being criticized for submitting an irrelevant amendment that failed to address the core objective of developing the defense industry. The criticism is aimed at their minimal contribution and the misplacement of priorities, calling on Reinsalu to utilize his political skills for the benefit of the economy.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the presiding officer of the session, who is accused of dereliction of duty and tolerating disruptors (including members of their own party). The criticism is intense and procedural, ranging from demands to call people to order to recommending that they submit their resignation. Additionally, the government's communication practices are criticized for favoring social media over the parliament.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at both the government (specifically the Minister of Finance) and the opposition. The government is criticized for its indifference and lack of ambition in implementing NATO defense plans. The opposition, meanwhile, is accused of taking an entirely populist stance: they demand higher defense spending but simultaneously refuse to support any necessary tax revenue decisions, accusing the government of lying.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
He sharply criticizes Isamaa (Urmas Reinsalu) and EKRE (Arvo Aller), accusing them of populism and an inability to do substantive work, because they failed to submit any amendments in the committee. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, noting that the opposition has "failed to clear the bar" and that their subsequent complaining is unfair. He calls on them to stop the populism and start working.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed against the regime of the Russian Federation and its aggressive ideology, which is viewed as a direct threat to Estonia, escalating from mere rhetoric to hybrid attacks and terrorism. Criticism is also leveled at the Riigikogu's internal procedures, particularly the inadequate coordination of foreign and security policy, citing the China visit as an example. He/She indirectly criticizes the opposition's past actions, which were limited solely to making demands rather than offering solutions.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The main opponents are Isamaa (Urmas Reinsalu, Mr. Seeder) and EKRE (Martin Helme, Moonika Helme), who are being intensely attacked on both a personal and moral level. The criticism centers on their perceived lack of values, the formation of government coalitions despite known ties to Russia, and allegations of corruption (specifically the residence permit business/scandal). Furthermore, the opponents are being accused of hypocrisy and outright lying.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at a specific business culture that bases its operations on violating traffic laws, particularly within the courier services sector. Sharp criticism is also leveled against the government of the time, which treated cohabiting partners unequally and disrespectfully, signaling strong value-based opposition. This opposition targets both unethical business practices and previous social policy.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism. The only objection is a procedural recommendation to the Deputy Chairman of the National Defence Committee not to form a position before the discussion takes place, which is rather a call for procedural correctness.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at the bill presented by Mr. Vooglaid, the purpose of which is being questioned. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the inadequacy and infeasibility of the proposed solution. The speaker implies that the bill's goal is not to solve the problem, but rather merely to talk about it.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker indirectly takes a stand against Urmas Reinsalu and Jaak Valge, whose arguments opposing the change in voting age are evidently linked to the correlation between age and competence. Reinsalu’s procedural concern regarding the timing of the discussion on election organization—specifically, holding it right before the elections—is also acknowledged, but this is deemed insignificant at the first reading stage.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the opponents of the bill who are employing scare tactics and warning against provoking Russia, calling this argument baseless. The primary opposing force is Russia, which is considered the only party that stands to lose if the bill is adopted.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is being sharply criticized, with their motion of no confidence being labeled as part of an election campaign that does not warrant serious attention. The criticism focuses on the procedure itself and the lack of substantive arguments, given that the opposition has failed to highlight any genuine issues in the management of the reform. A specific opponent, Toomas Uibo, is being challenged for overemphasizing a historical claim.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets wealthy European NATO nations that fail to meet defense spending commitments, accusing them of enjoying the "peace dividend" while others carry the load. Indirect criticism is also leveled at those obstructing Sweden's accession to NATO, as well as American populists whose arguments are fueled by European weakness. The criticism is based on policy and principle, not personal attacks.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The confrontation is aimed at the presenter, whose knowledge and preparation concerning the draft tax bills are being called into question. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the necessity of providing the full assembly with a complete and detailed overview of the bill's content, especially in the case of complex taxation mechanisms.