Session Profile: Aleksei Jevgrafov
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
2024-10-16
Political Position
The political focus is on funding national defense and the adequacy of the security tax. The speaker takes a strong, policy-driven stance, citing a minister's previous statement that the bill currently under consideration is flawed and fails to fully meet security requirements. This position is provocative and demands that the government provide clarity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the numerical indicators of national defense expenditures (percentages of GDP, e.g., 2% vs 3%) and relevant legislation (the draft bill). This expertise is evident in their capacity to quote the minister’s prior statements (made to the Estonian Public Broadcasting) and insist on concrete, quantitative solutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and challenging, addressing both the presiding officer and the minister. Logical argumentation is employed, relying on the minister's own words to highlight the deficiencies of the draft bill. The speech is brief, focusing on the demand for specific figures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data. All that is known is participation in the plenary session, including the submission of a question.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is directed at the minister and the security tax bill currently being processed by the government. The criticism is strictly policy-based, accusing the draft legislation of failing to meet its intended objective and of being inadequate in guaranteeing security.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data. The address is aimed at summoning the minister and demands clarity, rather than offering cooperation or compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively at the national level, addressing the financing of national defense and the impact of the security tax across the whole of Estonia. There is no regional or local emphasis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective centers on the relationship between national defense spending and taxation (the security tax). The speaker stresses the necessity of guaranteeing adequate fiscal coverage for security requirements, suggesting that the current tax rate is insufficient, and calling for specific percentage metrics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data. Social issues (education, immigration, civil liberties) are not addressed; the focus is entirely on security.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Legislative focus is centered on the pending security tax bill. The speaker is a critical opponent who is questioning the bill's justification and demanding clarification from the government regarding what figures would guarantee the complete coverage of security needs.
1 Speeches Analyzed