Agenda Profile: Aleksei Jevgrafov
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker offers measured support for raising the issue of ensuring the trustworthiness of e-elections, viewing it as a highly important political topic. However, procedural doubt is expressed regarding the technical competence of Riigikogu members to carry out the assigned tasks, while focusing on the substantive framework of the draft legislation. The political focus is directed toward ensuring election security.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of the critical need for specific technical skills and knowledge when investigating e-voting security. Their expertise is expressed primarily through emphasizing the necessity of involving external researchers and specialists in the work of the investigative commission.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, addressing the Chairman of the Riigikogu and a colleague directly. The speaker employs logical argumentation, questioning the feasibility of the draft bill and demanding clarification regarding the involvement of experts.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Participation is shown in the Riigikogu session during the first reading of the draft bill, where critical and procedural questions are posed. Data regarding other appearances or the frequency (rhythm) is missing.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker analyzes the bill proposed by the Centre Party, but the criticism is aimed at the technical feasibility of the bill's objectives and the lack of competence among members of the Riigikogu. The attacks are not personal; instead, they focus on procedural and substantive discrepancies.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is open to collaboration and actively seeks opportunities to integrate professional expertise into the political decision-making process. This is demonstrated by the direct question regarding whom (specialists or scientists) should be involved in the work of the investigation committee.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on the draft resolution (576 OE) concerning the formation of the Riigikogu investigative committee and ensuring the security of e-elections. The speaker acts as a critical questioner, challenging whether the necessary competence exists to carry out the tasks outlined in the draft resolution and demanding explanations.
1 Speeches Analyzed