Agenda Profile: Aleksei Jevgrafov
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and Related Acts (Increase of the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)
2024-06-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance is one of strong opposition to the government bill (415 SE) regarding the increase of the fine unit, particularly concerning public transport and vehicles that do not comply with technical requirements. The focus is placed on the bill's lack of justification and practical applicability, calling on the ministry to provide analysis and data. The argument is framed around policy and results, criticizing the dismissal of reasonable proposals put forward by the opposition.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates deep knowledge regarding the specifics of the amendments to the Penal Code and the fine rates (for example, the increase from 80 euros to 160 euros). Particular emphasis is placed on understanding implementation issues, such as the lack of technical and financial capacity necessary for checking compliance with technical requirements. Specific data is requested regarding the revenue collected from these fines and future plans.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and demanding, expressing frustration over the rejection of the opposition's proposals ("sad to state," "to the trash can"). Direct questions are employed to demand data, analysis, and justifications for legislative amendments from the rapporteur and the ministry. The tone is logical and procedural, focusing on facts and implementation capacity.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed at the government/majority, who are being criticized for ignoring the opposition's "very good and reasonable proposals." The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy (unjustified increases in fines) and procedural injustice.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
A cooperative style is evident within the opposition itself, whose proposals are deemed "very good and reasonable." There is no indication whatsoever of cooperation with the governing party; communication is instead controlling and confrontational, demanding justifications from the ministry.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislative amendments (the Penal Code) relating to public transport and technical requirements. There is no reference to specific regional problems, industries, or communities.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives center on fiscal accountability, requiring data regarding income generated from fines and calling into question the suitability of the new penalty rates. Emphasis is placed on the state's lack of financial and technical capability to implement new control mechanisms.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social issues under discussion pertain to public order and safety, particularly concerning fare evasion and adherence to technical requirements for vehicles. The focus is placed on the capacity and deficiencies of law enforcement, rather than on broader social freedoms.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on Bill 415 SE, which concerns increasing the fine unit. The speaker is a critical opponent of the bill, challenging its amendments regarding public transport fines and violations of technical requirements. The goal is to compel the presenter to submit an analysis and justifications.
3 Speeches Analyzed