Agenda Profile: Jüri Jaanson
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
Political Position
The political focus is on resolving conflicts between child protection and existing legislation, particularly concerning the Equal Treatment Act versus ensuring children's safety. The speaker expresses concern that the draft bill places business owners and institutional heads in an awkward position, potentially forcing them to hire individuals who pose a risk. The stance is moderately critical and focuses on the practical consequences of policy implementation, highlighting the "dilemma" (or "Catch-22") created by the draft legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of child protection, labor law, and criminal records, citing the duty of care and the Equal Treatment Act. This expertise is evident in the identification of complex legal dilemmas that arise when implementing the draft law at the business level. Clarification is also sought regarding the substance of notification systems and how they can be improved.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and cautious, respectfully addressing both the session chair and the presenter. The appeal is primarily logical, focusing on highlighting practical issues and legal conflicts. The speaker uses questions to draw attention to potential contradictions within the legislation and the possible danger posed to children.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct confrontation with specific individuals, but the criticism is aimed at the Social Affairs Committee, questioning whether they recognize the danger inherent in the dilemma the draft bill creates for businesses. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, highlighting the bill's deficiencies in ensuring child safety.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker expresses willingness to cooperate, noting that the process of handling the draft bill can still be managed and amendments can be proposed. Communication with the rapporteur is courteous and focuses on clarifying details and resolving issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national-level legislation concerning child protection and labor law, without referencing specific regions or local projects.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective centers on shielding entrepreneurs and institutional managers from excessive regulatory burdens and legal complications. It is stressed that the proposed bill should not force employers into a position where they must hire potentially dangerous individuals, as this runs counter to the fundamental objective of ensuring child safety.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is ensuring the safety of children and protecting them from individuals with pedophilic tendencies, even if their criminal records have lapsed. The speaker emphasizes the duty of care and prioritizes the protection of children above the strict application of equal treatment legislation during the hiring process.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft Act amending the Child Protection Act and other acts (427 SE). The speaker’s role is that of a critical scrutinizer, seeking clarification regarding the improvement of the reporting system and drawing attention to the potential risks of the draft and its conflicts with other legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed