By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova
Total Sessions: 46
Fully Profiled: 46
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the Centre Party and Eesti 200. The Centre Party is sharply criticized, and their previous inaction regarding lowering energy prices and VAT on foodstuffs while they were in government is labeled hypocritical. Eesti 200 is accused of hypocrisy concerning the issue of targeted subsidies. The criticism is primarily policy- and performance-based.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Strong opposition is directed at the government led by the Reform Party, Prime Minister Kristen Michal, and a specific minister. The criticism is policy- and results-based, accusing them of failing to protect nature, making biodiversity protection toothless by changing RMK’s expectations, and letting down the process of drafting the climate law. The opposition is intense, claiming that the government is giving momentum to the devastation of the nature that still remains.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are criticized for their tax policy and budget management. The criticism is both political and substantive, accusing the Reform Party of abandoning right-wing politics and implementing unfair taxation that harms purchasing power. Furthermore, the government is criticized for taking out a quick, high-interest loan (an "SMS loan") to cover current expenses and for favoring the wealthy.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary target is Minister Jürgen Ligi and the budget he presented. The criticism is aimed both at the policy itself (a large deficit, unfair redistribution) and at his personal motives and values, effectively questioning the minister's conscience and patriotism. The attacks are intense and directly demand to know who is forcing the minister to make these kinds of decisions.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is directed squarely at the government and ministers, accusing them of causing chaos and pursuing an unfair budgetary policy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, addressing both the budget deficit and procedural errors in the implementation of education reforms (specifically, the failure to assess their impact). There is no information available regarding a willingness to compromise; the focus remains strictly on strong opposition.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is directed at the minister and government agencies (Ministry of Climate, Government Office), who are accused of unnecessarily entering into contracts with private companies and underestimating the ministry's competence. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural errors and inefficient management.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main conflict is with the government and the coalition, who are being criticized for procedural flaws in the formation of a key council. The criticism is aimed at the government's inability to ensure gender-balanced representation that cohesively shapes society.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed at the actions and accountability of the executive power (the minister), criticizing potential financial irregularities and insufficient oversight within the education sector. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on the government's overall competence.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the state and the government, which fails to cover cancer treatment but taxes charitable foundations. The critique is policy-driven and intense, emphasizing the state's unfair treatment of charity.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who are being accused of political failure, particularly concerning youth unemployment and foreign labor quotas. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, casting doubt on the state's ability to manage large-scale projects and maintain investor confidence.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main targets of criticism are the EKRE parliamentary group (for their absence and wasting parliamentary time) and the presiding officer of the session (for failing to resolve the situation). Strong substantive criticism is also directed at the Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office regarding their assessments of victims of sexual violence, demanding that the prosecutors be held accountable.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the Reform Party, criticizing the soundness of their economic policies and their failure to deliver on election promises. The criticism is intense, escalating from mere political failure to accusations that the government is failing to protect the populace and is instead siding with criminals. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise in the rhetoric.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the minister responsible for the justice sector, sharply criticizing his actions and ethical conduct in the Riigikogu hall. The criticism is both procedural (hiding analyses, classifying them as internal) and personal (denying the right to speak, causing embarrassment). The speaker directly accuses the minister of obstructing parliamentary oversight.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the government, which are facing fierce criticism over their political choices (VAT, gambling tax) and their failure to uphold election promises. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of neglecting the well-being of families while prioritizing "the servicing of narrow business interests." Opponents are also criticized for their vague and confusing communication.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The primary criticism targets the government’s decision-making processes, specifically accusing officials of yielding to pressure from certain economic sectors at the expense of cultural and natural heritage. This criticism is political and value-driven, and it is being presented directly to the prime minister, demanding an explanation of the underlying considerations.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The primary confrontation is directed against the actions of the minister and the government, who stand accused of acting in the interests of monopolists and obstructing fair competition. The criticism is intense and addresses both political choices (high prices, hindering the free market) and the inability of state institutions to enforce court rulings due to a lack of resources. The questioning of the opponent's motives is evident.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary targets of criticism are Minister of Justice Liisa-Ly Pakosta and the Prosecutor's Office, who stand accused of systemic failure, betraying vulnerable individuals, and evading accountability. The criticism is intense, targeting both the mindset of the relevant authorities and specific instances of inaction, particularly the Minister's failure to propose solutions. The government is also being criticized for abandoning strategic objectives (the consolidation of the hospital network).
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponent is the government, specifically the Reform Party, which is accused of deliberately deepening the climate crisis and undermining the foundations of democracy. Criticism targets both political decisions (forestry, nuclear energy, wood pellets) and procedures (the marginalization of scientists, cuts to the Environmental Board, and the prioritization of lobbyists). Compromise with the government's current policies is clearly ruled out, as these policies serve narrow business interests rather than the public good.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The main confrontation is aimed at the government's forestry policy, the Prime Minister, and Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment. The criticism is political, focusing on the policy's ambiguity and the risks it poses, which would allow the forestry industry to eliminate restrictions on logging volumes and create "tree fields."
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the Reform Party and its leadership, who face sharp criticism over political contradictions and outdated tax policies. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the party of a mismatch between stated goals and the means used to achieve them. The opposing minister's self-assurance is treated with sarcasm.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary adversary is the Reform Party and Michal’s government, who stand accused of eroding democracy and making non-transparent decisions. The criticism is intense and accusatory, claiming that the government serves the interests of narrow business circles (party funders) at the expense of the entire society. The opposition targets both specific policies (logging) and procedures (lack of public involvement, and the reduction of democracy under the guise of cutting bureaucracy).
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Direct opposition or criticism of the policies is not voiced; instead, questions are posed to the minister regarding the government's activities. The speaker assumes the role of an overseer, seeking confirmation regarding future plans.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Fierce opposition is directed against the Reform Party-led government, which is accused of long-term inaction and the deterioration of conditions in the Natura areas since 2004. The criticism is intense and focuses on the failure to implement policy and the adoption of "highly questionable maneuvers" to avoid infringement proceedings.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction or its inadequate plans for reducing the unpaid care gap. The opposition is policy-driven, demanding that the government address the issue of the care work gap in addition to the existing wage gap.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary objection is aimed at the actions of the government and the minister, criticizing them for causing confusion and breaking promises regarding nature conservation. Specifically, the party Eesti 200 is criticized for their alleged forest policy, which prioritizes 70% logging over 30% protection.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism targets the minister, who is held responsible for ensuring the moral and lawful conduct of the Prosecutor's Office, as well as the specific prosecutor whose public statements have damaged the dignity of the victims. The speaker is calling into question the prosecutor's fitness to continue in the position, which constitutes a strong personal and moral attack.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the Prime Minister (Kristen Michal), who is sharply criticized over high inflation and the policy concerning VAT on foodstuffs. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, demanding concrete solutions and tax amendments. The opponent's policies are being blamed for reducing people's purchasing power.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's plan to bring foreign workers to Estonia using relaxed wage criteria. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, as the speaker claims it will clearly undermine the financial stability of Estonian families and hinder local wage growth.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the new government's plan, especially the part concerning the utilization of natural resources and the easing of environmental protection restrictions. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative impact of these measures on climate stability and social welfare. The opposition is presented in the form of questions that highlight the policy's ineffectiveness.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and Finance Minister Ligi, who has been quoted on the issue of bureaucracy. The criticism is procedural, highlighting the inability of a key minister to obtain a NATO security clearance, which casts doubt on the assurance of security.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Direct confrontation with specific political groups is not voiced. Indirectly, "responsible politicians" are criticized for the slow implementation of global climate measures, which exacerbates the problem and threatens children's rights. The criticism is aimed at inaction and the insufficient seriousness with which these challenges are being treated.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is actively addressing objections and misunderstandings raised by the audience regarding the potential relaxation of restrictions concerning working with children. The opposition targets the misinterpretation of the bill's content, not specific political groups, and this is being handled gently and reassuringly.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
There is no opposition.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker does not directly criticize opponents, but is actively engaged in refuting the mistaken assumptions and misinformation that have emerged surrounding the draft bill regarding the easing of restrictions on working with children. He acknowledges his colleagues' concerns, but stresses that this worry is based on a faulty understanding of the facts. The opposition is aimed at political misrepresentation, not at individuals.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the governing coalition and state leaders, who are accused of breaking promises and failing to pass the draft bill for a climate-resilient economy. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of postponing real action for years and taking an irresponsibly high level of risk. Also criticized is the general attitude ("Why should we have to do anything?"), which ignores Estonia's high per capita pollution.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Opponents are neither criticized nor mentioned; the speech focuses solely on the positive presentation of the bill and soliciting support.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the initiators of Draft Law 450 (EKRE MPs), who are accused of engaging in displacement activities and are given a sharp personal recommendation to stop interfering in decisions concerning women's bodies. There is also opposition to the socialization of costs related to the burning of fossil fuels, demanding that the polluter bears the responsibility.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposing force or threat is clearly defined as "Russia and the Kremlin regime," whose activities Estonian Orthodox believers must be protected from. The criticism is directed along foreign policy and security lines, not against domestic political opponents.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the leadership of the Environment Committee and the supporters of the draft bill, who are being criticized both for procedural shortcomings and for ethical concerns (decision-making resulting from lobbying). The criticism is intense and is also aimed at the quality of the legislative process (lack of inclusion, dissemination of false information). The speaker encourages colleagues not to support the draft bill.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the bill's sponsors and their procedural approach, criticizing the haste and the superficiality of the draft legislation. Criticism is also aimed at the unrealistic nature of cost planning for major projects.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct opposition, but policy-based criticism is being raised regarding the ambitiousness of the established goals. The criticism is directed at the targets and their adequacy, not at individuals or procedures.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at European Union member states (specifically Austria) and their energy companies, which continue to import Russian gas, thereby padding the Russian war chest. The Russian military is described in extremely negative and dehumanizing terms ("Russian orcs").
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data