Session Profile: Züleyxa Izmailova
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
2024-11-21
Political Position
The most prominent theme is the climate and environmental crisis, which is addressed as an existential threat to the economy, security, and quality of life. The speaker urgently calls for the restoration of natural capital and a transition to a carbon-free economy, while simultaneously criticizing the government's proposed climate law as insufficient and irresponsibly delaying action. The focus is heavily value-based, emphasizing responsibility to future generations and the necessity of operating within planetary boundaries.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of environmental economics and climate policy, using technical terms such as natural capital, biodiversity, green technologies, and planetary boundaries. He/She highlights specific economic data (44 trillion dollars of GDP) and links the environmental crisis to food security, health risks, and global conflicts. Furthermore, he/she consciously alludes to the debate on national defense funding, citing former Commander of the Defense Forces Martin Herem.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is urgent, serious, and critical, particularly regarding the government's inaction and irresponsibility concerning climate issues. It employs both logical arguments (economic risks, pollution statistics) and strong emotional appeals, emphasizing moral obligation and the prevention of suffering for future generations. The address is formal and concludes with a call to consolidate efforts to avert the worst-case scenarios of climate change.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the governing coalition and state leaders, who are accused of breaking promises and failing to pass the draft bill for a climate-resilient economy. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of postponing real action for years and taking an irresponsibly high level of risk. Also criticized is the general attitude ("Why should we have to do anything?"), which ignores Estonia's high per capita pollution.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The need for international cooperation is emphasized, both in tackling the climate crisis (at the European level and globally) and regarding security issues (assisting Ukraine). The Kaja Kallas-led government is mentioned as a positive example, having acted as a strong and well-organized task force to repel the Kremlin regime.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily international and global, addressing the climate crisis, the war in Ukraine, and tensions in the Middle East, while emphasizing Estonia's role at the European and world level. Nationally, the concentration is on securing the future of the Estonian people and protecting crop yields from unstable weather conditions. Local or regional problems are not given attention.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports the implementation of the market economy for the protection of the natural environment, demanding the development of new business models and services that improve daily life while simultaneously increasing natural capital. It views the transition to a carbon-free and regenerative economy as the guarantee of economic growth and resilience. It criticizes financial institutions for supporting companies that emit greenhouse gases.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social themes, emphasis is placed on protecting the well-being and health of future generations from the impacts of climate change, as the collapse of ecosystems threatens an environment suitable for human life. Mention is made of young people's understanding of the seriousness of the global climate crisis and the need to ensure the availability of clean water and soil suitable for growing food.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on the creation of a climate law, regarding which the speaker is a strong opponent of the current "draft law on a climate-resilient economy." The draft is criticized for falling short of expectations, failing to provide the anticipated legal clarity, and postponing the implementation of real measures for years.
1 Speeches Analyzed