Session Profile: Annely Akkermann
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
2024-06-12
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the introduction of the motor vehicle tax, while simultaneously acknowledging that tax increases are unpopular. They emphasize a pragmatic approach: revenue must be collected for the state budget, and this requires utilizing both cost cutting and increasing income. The speaker advocates for making the tax conditions more tolerable for the taxpayer, thereby demonstrating a willingness to compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of taxation and legislation. Utilizes precise technical terminology, referencing specific sections and legislative amendments. Provides a detailed explanation of the motor vehicle tax structure, the mechanisms of the registration fee, and the impact of European Union legal acts. Publicly and factually corrects erroneous claims made by other politicians.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs an explanatory and fact-based approach, honestly acknowledging the unpopularity of tax hikes. The tone is moderate and constructive, seeking to persuade through logical arguments. It utilizes concrete examples and figures, avoiding emotional rhetoric. It publicly makes corrections and clarifications, demonstrating honesty and transparency.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Actively participated in the Finance Committee and engagement meetings. Maintains regular communication with stakeholders, including representatives of leasing companies and car dealers. Closely monitors the public appearances of other politicians and corrects erroneous information when necessary.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She moderately challenges the opposition's criticism, arguing that the draft bill has shifted to become more favorable to the taxpayer. Specifically, he/she corrects Urmas Reinsalu's erroneous claims concerning the cumulation of the registration fee. He/She does not employ sharp rhetoric, choosing instead to focus on clarifying the facts and correcting falsehoods.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Stresses cooperation with various parties—the Ministry of Finance, the Finance Committee, interest groups, and the European Commission. Acknowledges the impact of the opposition's amendments on improving the draft legislation. Demonstrates openness to compromise and accommodating the concerns of taxpayers.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It mentions local governments in sparsely populated areas and the necessity of supporting demand-responsive public transport there. It emphasizes the mobility requirements of residents in remote regions and the compensation provided to employees who use their personal vehicles for work. It demonstrates an understanding of regional differences.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports a balanced approach to improving the state budget—encompassing both expenditure cuts and revenue increases. Acknowledges that tax hikes are necessary for the functioning and security of the state. Seeks to alleviate the tax burden on average-wage earners by eliminating the 'tax hump' (maksuküür). Demonstrates understanding regarding the concerns of the business sector.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the details of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and its subsequent refinement. Actively working on reforming the tax system, addressing both initial registration fees and annual levies. Mentions upcoming amendments concerning corporate benefits. Demonstrates a commitment to enhancing the legislative framework within the taxation sector.
3 Speeches Analyzed