Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the introduction of a motor vehicle tax, justifying it on the grounds of environmental objectives, improving urban planning, and increasing state revenue. They express a clear liberal worldview, advocating for a minimal state and austere social benefits. They emphasize that tax concessions should be personalized and targeted only at those genuinely in need, rather than being general benefits.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a deep understanding of taxation, fiscal policy, and public administration. References specific laws (Constitution, § 106), utilizes precise examples (such as the 50-euro child benefit in 2022), and quotes the views of colleague Jürgen Ligi. Exhibits strong familiarity with both local government challenges and the management of state registers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
They employ an evidence-based and argumentative approach, relying on specific examples and personal experiences. The style is explanatory and persuasive, utilizing both emotional (children and strollers) and rational arguments. It integrates personal anecdotes (a businessman's appeal to them) with general political principles.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She actively participates in the work of the Finance Committee, referencing prior protocols and the committee's established procedures. They mention being already familiar with the draft legislation and having had the opportunity to submit their questions. This demonstrates consistent engagement with legislative processes and committee activities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
It moderately criticizes obstructionist behavior in the legislative process, specifically referencing "obstructionist bills" that lack a formal intent to draft or a preparatory plan. It expresses opposition to general tax concessions that fail to truly reach those who need assistance. The critique is delivered systemically rather than personally.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate in committee work, mentioning the need to take colleagues into account regarding procedural issues. The individual refers positively to Jürgen Ligi’s views, showing a readiness to rely on the experience of others. They emphasize the necessity of finalizing procedural decisions before continuing the substantive discussion.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses on the issues facing both urban centers (Tallinn, Pärnu, Kalamaja) and rural areas. It highlights specific examples of the challenges posed by scattered settlements, referencing the director of Kilingi-Nõmme Gymnasium and the practice of enrolling students farm by farm. It emphasizes the necessity of adopting different approaches for different regions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It clearly adheres to a liberal economic philosophy, advocating for low taxes and minimal government intervention. It operates on the belief that individuals know best how to utilize their own money. While supporting the collection of taxes necessary for fulfilling essential state functions, it stresses the importance of avoiding unnecessary subsidies or benefits for affluent groups.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Emphasizes the necessity of focusing on groups genuinely in need of assistance—namely, large families, people with special needs, and residents of sparsely populated areas. Supports a personalized approach to social policy, ensuring that aid is specifically targeted. Expresses concern regarding the safety of children and families on urban streets.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on deliberating the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, stressing the importance of thorough analysis and the intention to draft legislation. It supports high-quality lawmaking and proper procedures. It highlights the need to improve the quality of state registers to ensure sound policymaking.
2 Speeches Analyzed