Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First Reading of the Bill (217 SE) to Amend the Income Tax Act
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The speaker adopts a clearly neutral and procedure-focused position when addressing the amendments to the Income Tax Act. They do not express a personal viewpoint regarding the substance of the draft bill, but instead concentrate on procedural matters and providing an objective account of the committee's work. It is emphasized that the government did not support the bill, and the committee lacked sufficient oversight regarding the activities of the NGO "Ukraine for Estonia."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates strong command of the domain regarding parliamentary procedure and committee work, utilizing precise procedural terminology and dates. Exhibits in-depth knowledge of voting results and procedural steps. The expertise focuses more on formal procedure than on substantive tax policy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs an official, fact-based, and emotionally neutral style. The discourse is structured chronologically, focusing on specific facts and procedure. Evaluative statements are avoided, prioritizing objective reporting regarding the commission's workflow and decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Actively performs the role of the Steering Committee representative, providing a detailed report on the proceedings of the Committee's September 25 session. Demonstrates a systematic approach to monitoring procedural matters and reporting to the Plenary.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
While not voicing direct opposition, it notes the government's non-supportive stance on the draft bill. It neutrally highlights that six members of the committee supported the motion to reject the bill, suggesting a critical view of the bill’s current formulation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The text stresses the importance of consensus decision-making when determining the agenda and appointing the representative of the steering committee. It shows a willingness to cooperate on procedural matters, even though substantive disagreements arose that necessitated a vote.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The text addresses income tax matters primarily from a procedural perspective, specifically mentioning the tax exemption for donations made to non-profit organizations. It does not articulate a clear stance on the direction of tax policy, focusing instead on the necessity of legal clarity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It indirectly touches on the subject of supporting Ukraine via the NGO "Ukraina Eest," but fails to take a clear position on those activities. It emphasizes the need to receive more information about the organization's activities before making any decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the amendments to the Income Tax Act, specifically addressing the tax issues related to donations made to non-profit organizations. It stresses the importance of procedural aspects, including clarity regarding effective dates and the avoidance of retroactive taxation.
2 Speeches Analyzed