Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (235 SE)
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker adopted a clear stance against the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act, communicating the committee's decision to reject the proposal. The position was formal and procedural, centered on the collective decision of the committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs a formal, neutral tone, focusing on the delivery of facts without emotional judgments. The style is concise and direct, emphasizing their role as a representative of the commission.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participated in the work of the committee, where the draft income tax act was discussed. The activity focused on submitting the committee's decisions to Parliament.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasized the commission's collective work and decision, demonstrating institution-based cooperation. He/She noted that no discussion arose within the commission, which indicates a consensus-driven approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supported the commission's decision to reject the draft bill for amending the Income Tax Act, but no specific economic viewpoints were expressed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focused on the handling of the draft amendment to the Income Tax Act, serving as the committee's representative and transmitting the recommendation to reject the bill. He stressed his role as the intermediary for the committee's decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed