Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (169 SE)
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker supports the government's position regarding the draft amendment to the Value Added Tax Act, expressing clear opposition to the bill. The position is firm and decisive, without compromises.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs a concise, businesslike, and formal style. The tone is neutral and factual, focusing on the commission's decision and procedural aspects, and is devoid of emotional or persuasive elements.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker participated in the work of the Finance Committee during the discussion of the draft Value Added Tax Act. A single brief intervention suggests a rather passive role in parliamentary activity during that period.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker notes that Martin Helme was not asked any questions by the commission, but adds that this is intended as a neutral observation rather than direct criticism or confrontation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is acting in line with the position of the Finance Committee and the Government, supporting the collective decision to reject the draft legislation. This demonstrates teamwork within the committee.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports the government's economic policy concerning VAT matters, while expressing opposition to amendments to the VAT Act. The stance is conservative regarding the preservation of the existing regulation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focusing on the regulations of the Value Added Tax Act, supporting the rejection of the draft bill. The role is more supportive than initiating, adhering to the guidelines set by the commission and the government in legislative work.
1 Speeches Analyzed