Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports local government autonomy, particularly concerning kindergarten fees, arguing that the Riigikogu should not interfere with municipalities' budgetary decisions. He sharply opposes the creation of permanent expenditures through a supplementary budget, justifying this stance by the resulting increase in the taxpayer burden. Furthermore, the speaker defends the Reform Party's financial policy, highlighting Estonia's A+ rating and the tax system recognized by the OECD.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates profound knowledge of the state budget process, detailing the structure of the supplementary budget, the allocation of funds, and the accounting of value-added tax (VAT). Possesses a strong command of tax system nuances, explaining the variations in effective tax rates across different income brackets. Exhibits expert knowledge regarding the work of the Finance Committee and budgetary procedures.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses a factual, detailed style, relying on numerical data and concrete examples. The tone is official and procedural, but becomes sharper when debating the opposition. It concludes with the emotional appeal, "Tell the truth!" when the speaker feels they have been misrepresented.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Actively participated in the work of the Finance Committee on June 12 and 16, preparing for the third reading. Thoroughly fulfilled the duties of rapporteur, providing detailed answers to colleagues' questions and clarifying the substance of the draft bill. Demonstrated consistent involvement throughout all stages of the budget process.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharply criticizes Andrei Korobeinik for resorting to personal attacks, accusing him of spreading false claims regarding the tax system and wage issues. The speaker rejects the Social Democrats' proposed amendments, arguing that they are inappropriate in the context of the supplementary budget. Furthermore, the speaker vehemently opposes claims regarding the failure of the Reform Party's fiscal policy.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It cooperates with the government and the Finance Committee, strictly adhering to official procedures. It refers to Regina Vällik's explanations and the government's positions, demonstrating coordination between institutions. There is no cooperation with the Social Democrats, as they did not participate in the committee's work.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses on national issues, citing Tallinn as an example of local government autonomy in abolishing kindergarten fees. It emphasizes that all municipalities can make similar decisions, but does not focus on specific regional problems.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports the current tax system, highlighting its competitiveness and recognition by the OECD. It opposes tax increases and stresses the importance of avoiding increased burdens on taxpayers. Furthermore, it defends the principle of progressive income tax, explaining that higher-income individuals pay proportionally more taxes.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It addresses the need to raise the subsistence benefit, while acknowledging the existence of the problem, but opposes solving it through a supplementary budget. It supports the right of local governments to decide on kindergarten fee issues. It recommends that people seek personal solutions in the event of economic difficulties.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the deliberation of the 2025 supplementary budget bill, highlighting the allocation of 44.2 million euros for broad national defense projects. Supports passing the bill in its unaltered form, rejecting the amendments put forth by the Social Democrats. Emphasizes strict adherence to proper procedural rules.
16 Speeches Analyzed