Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act (432 SE) – First Reading
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speakers are taking a clear stance against the amendments to the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the Government of the Republic does not support draft bill 432. The Finance Committee's proposal is to reject the bill during the first reading. The representative of the Reform Party is actively explaining the issues related to the taxation of social benefits, showing a supportive attitude toward the current system.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speakers demonstrate profound expertise in the field of tax policy, utilizing precise figures (700 euros per month, 8,400 euros annually, a marginal tax rate reduction from 34.5% to 22%). Their understanding of the work and procedures of the Finance Committee is comprehensive, as is their clear command of the rules governing the taxation of social benefits.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of discourse is formal and fact-based, focusing on procedural matters and the clarification of technical details. Direct, bureaucratic language is employed, devoid of emotional expression. The emphasis is placed on accuracy and the correction of facts.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speakers highlighted their active involvement in the work of the Finance Committee, including the September 16 meeting with representatives from the Ministry of Finance. They also mentioned the regular monitoring of government decisions and the planning of future discussions for October.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Expressing clear opposition to the bill put forth by the Isamaa faction, which has been dubbed the "fictitious tax hump." The criticism is primarily policy-based, not personal, focusing on the substantive lack of merit in the draft legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speakers emphasize cooperation with the Ministry of Finance and the government, citing consultations with officials. In the work of the commission, everyone is guaranteed the opportunity to express an opinion, although no substantive discussion takes place.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
They support the existing income tax system and express concern regarding the negative impact of the tax hump on the labor market and economic development. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of reducing the pressure of labor costs on employers while simultaneously maintaining the motivation to work.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
They explain that income tax is not withheld from subsistence benefits and state social benefits, including at the 2% rate. This demonstrates a supportive attitude towards maintaining the social protection system.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
They are focusing on the deliberation of amendments to the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, acting as opponents of the draft legislation. They emphasize adherence to correct procedural protocols and highlight the issues associated with submitting an identical bill.
4 Speeches Analyzed