By Plenary Sessions: Diana Ingerainen

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of public finance management and strategic planning. Technical terms such as "carry-over resources" and "strategic risk assessment" are employed, highlighting the necessity of designing planning processes. The expertise is focused on identifying and resolving systemic errors.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the work of Riigikogu committees, having been involved with both the Finance Committee and the Special Committee on State Budget Control. Also noteworthy is their previous experience as a board member of the Estonian Association of Family Doctors, which suggests a specific background in the administrative or political sphere of healthcare. Their expertise centers on evaluating processes and measuring dynamics.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the logistics of inmate healthcare and the competence of service providers, specifically mentioning Viljandi Hospital's extensive experience and high level of competence. The expertise centers on the provision of the service and related payment issues, indicating a detailed understanding of administrative matters.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the working procedures and schedule of the Finance Committee, knowing the precise dates of the sessions and the decisions made. He/She is well-acquainted with the purpose of the double taxation avoidance treaty and its 30 articles. At the same time, he/she frankly admits that the committee did not address the broader economic overview or specific monetary amounts.

The speaker demonstrates competence in economic and social policy, particularly concerning the impact of VAT, supply chain dynamics, and targeted assistance. Specific budget statistics are utilized (e.g., 200–400 million euros), and reference is made to economist Vitsur’s concept of "komberuum" and the experiences of European nations. Knowledge of public health risk factors is also demonstrated.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the European Union's long-term budgetary framework (2028–2034) and the financing of the social sector, citing specific figures (6.5 billion euros for Estonia) and percentages (14% allocated to the social sector). The knowledge base is particularly strong in analyzing welfare services, the fragmentation of pension systems, and the needs of the healthcare network. He/She emphasizes human-centric solutions and the necessity of factoring in demographic changes.

There is not enough data.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in tax policy and budget impacts, highlighting specific financial figures (400 million vs 200 million euros) and referencing the pricing chain. This expertise is based on analyses conducted by Ministry of Finance officials (Aet Külasalu, Madis Aben) and the Praxis think tank, as well as international examples drawn from Latvia and Finland.

The expertise is demonstrated in the field of budget planning and legislation, focusing specifically on the metrics used in the Budget Act and the methodologies underpinning them. The speaker shows awareness of the necessity of connecting the management of budgetary funds with the dynamic evolution of science and technology.

The expertise is evident in the legislative procedure and the work of the Finance Committee. It demonstrates knowledge of the bill's procedural progress, the negotiations, and the committee's decisions, while also referencing the involvement of the minister and another specialist (Tiina Hansson).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in conveying the procedural processes and decisions of the Finance Committee, detailing the times and participants of the meetings. The substantive knowledge concerns the effects of taxation and employment, referencing an academic background (faculty member Professor Urmas Varblane) and specific studies (the OSKA study). He/She emphasizes that a comprehensive picture of the effects of taxes on labor policy is lacking, which indicates a profound understanding of the subject matter.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the comprehensive approach to national defense and budget processes, particularly within the context of supplementary budgets. They employ terminology such as "impact assessments," "performance metrics," and "re-evaluation of resources," indicating a strong grasp of financial and security strategy.

The speaker demonstrates interest in international comparative politics, specifically inquiring about the use of examples from Israel and Finland in drafting the legislation. This suggests a desire to ensure that the proposed solutions are grounded in international experience and best practices.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in healthcare and medical processes, particularly concerning advance directives and palliative care. Specific terminology, such as the "Health Information System," is employed, and reference is made to the opportunities for general practitioners to consult with anesthesiologists and palliative care physicians.

The speaker demonstrates a strong command of the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the operational structure of the Finance Committee. They are capable of providing precise data regarding committee decisions, voting outcomes (5 in favor, 2 against), and the degree of consensus achieved. This expertise stems from a detailed understanding of the legislative process.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the working organization of the Finance Committee. They are knowledgeable about the discussion of bills, the involvement of the minister, and the setting of deadlines for amendments. This expertise is directed toward managing the legislative process as a representative of the lead committee.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in analyzing tax policy and its effects, citing researchers' studies and the experiences of other EU countries (e.g., Latvia). He/She emphasizes the need to investigate more deeply the Estonian food chain, from producers to final consumers, and the link between tax policy and public health. He/She relies on the viewpoints of experts from the Ministry of Finance and the Estonian Institute of Economic Research.

Insufficient data.