Session Profile: Martin Helme
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
2024-09-25
Political Position
The political position is extremely value-driven and focuses on opposing radical ideology, particularly concerning social gender and transgender issues. The speaker strongly opposes the ideology being introduced into Estonian laws via international conventions, deeming it "insane" and "madness." The position is strongly defensive of traditional norms and the interpretation of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the ideological concepts surrounding social gender and transgenderism, but primarily utilizes them to dismiss the opposing side's arguments. He/She references Article 12 of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia and genetic technology but quickly rejects these connections, focusing instead on ideological opposition. The argumentation relies more on moral and historical analogies (e.g., the 1921 parliament) rather than detailed legal or scientific data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is extremely combative, aggressive, and emotional, including direct personal attacks aimed at the opponent ("brazen lying," "crude demagoguery"). Heavily derogatory and ideological terms are employed ("insane left-radical ideological nonsense," "degenerates"), along with moral condemnation. The speaker uses simplified yet effective examples (the Olympics case) to illustrate their position.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Speeches were delivered during the plenary session of the Riigikogu, with the topic being discussed in the evening. Data is unavailable regarding other activity patterns, such as the frequency of appearances, meetings, or travel.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main adversary is Ms. Pakosta, who is being accused of brazen lying and crude demagoguery directed at the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The criticism is intense, personal, and ideological, aimed squarely at "progressives" and "left-wing radicals." The speaker completely rejects any support for the topic under discussion, deeming it an "extreme matter."
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data available
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and international conventions that are being incorporated into Estonian law (with reference to the International Labour Organization). Data regarding specific regional or local topics is unavailable.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The position on social issues is extremely conservative and condemnatory towards transgenderism, which is considered "madness" and a "perverse thing." The speaker stresses that people who wish to change their gender identity are "freaks" and require medical attention ("they should actually be sent to a doctor"), not ideological support. The objective is to prevent them from accessing gender-specific public spaces, such as women's changing rooms.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on the opposition to amendments being introduced into Estonian law through an international convention, specifically those relating to social gender and transgenderism. The speaker positions themselves as a strong opponent of the initiative, attempting to block it and accusing the initiator of bringing a "perverse matter" to the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament).
3 Speeches Analyzed