Agenda Profile: Martin Helme
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly represents the EKRE faction, submitting procedural voting motions on its behalf. The specific stance on the content of the draft bill (392 SE)—whether support or opposition—is not evident; the focus is entirely on procedural actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is extremely brief, polite, and strictly procedural ("Thank you!", "Please"). Substantive arguments, emotional appeals, or complex language usage are absent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The participant was active twice on that day (2024-04-03), fulfilling procedural duties related to voting on behalf of the faction.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates intra-factional cooperation by presenting motions on behalf of the EKRE faction, suggesting adherence to party discipline. Cross-party collaboration is not evident in the speeches.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the second reading of Draft Bill 392 SE (Amendments to the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act). The speaker’s role is that of a procedural supporter who is requesting that a vote be held.
2 Speeches Analyzed