Agenda Profile: Martin Helme
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Riigikogu Election Act, the Local Government Council Election Act, and the European Parliament Election Act (292 SE)
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The most prominent topic is the opposition to e-voting, which is treated as being in clear contradiction with the constitution and the fundamental principles of democracy. This stance is strong and value-based, centering on the necessity of restoring constitutional order and genuine democracy. The political focus is directed toward guaranteeing the legitimacy of the electoral system.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the history of election law and constitutional review, citing repeated litigation in the Supreme Court. Emphasis is placed on the lack of auditability and observability of the system, which points to expertise in the technical and legal aspects of electoral procedures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical and concerned, emphasizing the violation of democracy's fundamental principles. Logical argumentation is employed, referencing constitutional inconsistency and court decisions. To illustrate the situation, the metaphor of the "chicken-and-egg situation" is utilized, describing an institutional deadlock.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the debates on the election law in the Riigikogu chamber, noting that the topic has been repeatedly on the agenda and that they are familiar with the background facts. This suggests consistent engagement with this specific legislative issue.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary objects of criticism are the compositions of the Riigikogu (Parliament) that refuse to change the system, and the Supreme Court, which has upheld the laws despite having expressed dissatisfaction. The criticism is directed at the legitimacy of the system and procedures, not at individuals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speech concludes with a question regarding finding a solution, which indicates a desire to find a way out of the institutional deadlock. However, there is no direct reference to cooperation or a willingness to compromise with the opposing party.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the amendment of election laws to abolish e-voting, which is deemed unconstitutional. The speaker is a strong opponent of the existing system and seeks a solution for restoring constitutional order.
1 Speeches Analyzed