By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme
Total Sessions: 136
Fully Profiled: 136
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Insufficient data. The statements presented are purely critical and focus on questioning the government’s political and security-related shortcomings; there are no references to cooperation.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speech is purely confrontational and aggressive, focusing on defending the actions of the previous government while attacking the current one. There are no references to cooperation, compromise, or cross-party action.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is too little data.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is evident in the support and praise offered to a colleague ("Helmen") who advocates for vulnerable social groups. There is a complete absence of any reference to compromise with coalition partners or bipartisan cooperation; instead, the government's obstinacy is highlighted.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
There is a lack of willingness to cooperate because the speaker anticipates a unified vote by coalition members against the draft bill—an action that contradicts the rational functioning of the state. There is no mention of joint initiatives or openness to compromise.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
There isn't enough data.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The collaborative approach emphasizes the need for inter-ministerial action (Ministry of Defence and Ministry of the Interior) in mitigating environmental threats, as well as for international consultation (Finland). Resolving the rural crisis requires collective and swift action within the government when developing the relevant packages of measures.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Information regarding the style of cooperation with other political parties is unavailable; colleague Züleyxa Izmailova and the party’s own media staff are referenced when verifying the transcripts. Cooperation with the government is ruled out, as the speaker does not believe in "commissioned science" and demands independent research.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
There is no willingness to cooperate; the speaker focuses on holding the government accountable and demanding its resignation. The speaker points to the possibility of consensus regarding increased defense spending, but stresses that this must be done quietly and effectively, not through "blustering."
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation is focused both within and between the opposition parties, supporting colleagues in the Isamaa faction and stressing that "the entire opposition" demands answers from the prime minister. There is a lack of willingness to compromise when dealing with the coalition; the relationship is confrontational and demanding, centered on correcting the coalition's procedural mistakes.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The cooperative style is exacting; the speaker demands that the government take the initiative and convene a round table that would include the opposition, as well as skeptical and critical groups, to address the shortcomings of e-elections. This indicates a willingness to participate in the forum, but only with the goal of achieving concrete improvements or terminating e-voting entirely.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no information available regarding the cooperation style, as the speaker is focused solely on demanding the withdrawal of the bill and maintaining strong opposition, without proposing any opportunities for collaboration with the current supporters of the draft.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A collaborative style is only visible within the opposition itself, joining the view of the previous speaker Tõnis Lukas regarding the loss of confidence in the government. There is a complete lack of any indication of readiness for compromise or cooperation with the ruling coalition, which stands accused of manipulating the public.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers supportively to colleagues from the Isamaa party (Urmas Reinsalu and Helir-Valdor Seeder), who raised an unanswered question, thereby demonstrating cooperation within the opposition in highlighting procedural violations. There is no information regarding cooperation with the government side.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation or a willingness to compromise with domestic political forces. In the international context, the speaker expresses skepticism regarding Estonia’s capacity to act as a mediator in the Israel-Palestine conflict, given that Estonia has clearly chosen a side, which effectively rules out any mediation efforts as far as Israel is concerned.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Unwillingness to cooperate is evident; the speaker focuses on emphasizing the incompetence of opponents and condemning their actions. He sees the solution in adopting the legislation of foreign countries (more developed nations), rather than in local compromise.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is only discussed in the past tense, specifically referencing the previous coalition's plan to abolish the ERJK and transfer its functions to the National Audit Office. There is skepticism about reaching a compromise with the current government, based on the assumption that the government's draft bill will contain only "cosmetic changes."
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data. The speeches presented focus on aggressively criticizing and questioning the government, with no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The chosen style of cooperation prioritizes internal solidarity within the opposition. They note that the coalition's disparaging attacks target not only their own faction and the Centre Party (Keskerakond) but also other members of the opposition. There is no openness to compromise with the coalition, towards whom deep contempt is openly expressed.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
There is no information regarding opportunities for cooperation or a willingness to compromise. The speaker's style is purely confrontational and accusatory, focusing entirely on condemning the actions of the opposing side.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
In terms of cooperation, supportive reference is made to Rain Epler's statement, indicating a shared position with the colleague. There is no information regarding broader cross-party cooperation or a willingness for political mediation.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no willingness to cooperate; the discourse is purely oppositional and confrontational, focusing on the complete rejection of the draft bill.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is actively seeking cross-party cooperation, directly appealing to coalition members (especially the Social Democrats and the fringe members) to vote with the opposition for the repeal of the car tax. The aim of this cooperation is to break the coalition's razor-thin majority in order to overturn this specific piece of legislation.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation with the governing parties is completely absent; the speaker is extremely confrontational and dismissive. Collaboration with colleagues (e.g., the colleague from Raplamaa) is evident in confirming shared observations and public sentiment regarding tax increases.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
There is a complete lack of any indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the style is purely oppositional and aggressive, focusing on exposing the incompetence of the government's policies and its ministers.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The working style is focused on the intra-factional decision-making process, which is intended to result in a proposal to interrupt the debate on the draft bill. There is no information available regarding the seeking of compromises or cooperation with non-governmental bodies or between political parties.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Not enough data
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is inquisitive and dialogic, seeking feedback and clarifications from the opposing party regarding the content of the draft proposal. This demonstrates a readiness to engage with the subject matter and gather information, even if the initial stance was against processing the proposal.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style demonstrates support for colleagues with similar viewpoints (Mr. Valge, Mr. Grünthal), whose arguments are compelling and substantiated. There is a complete lack of openness to compromise with the opposing side, who are considered the destroyers of the Estonian nation-state.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is a complete lack of willingness to cooperate; the speaker's primary mode of communication is confrontation and accusation. He/She is setting conditions for potential future coalition partners (Isamaa, EKRE, Keskerakond) regarding the abolition of the car tax.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker stresses the need for parliamentary dialogue that also takes into account the opposition’s positions and draft legislation. Cooperation with the current government is completely absent, as the government is accused of tossing the opposition’s bills in the trash and continuing along a voluntaristic path.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
No data available
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker references prior coalition experience, noting that the decision regarding the 30 million support was reached "following heated debates," demonstrating an ability to make decisions despite internal tensions. In the current situation, he supports the investigative work being done by his Center Party colleague, but his overall tone remains confrontational and uncompromising, demanding that opponents back the investigative committee to clear up any suspicions.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses ironic openness to improving the draft bill ("Go on, make it better!"), yet criticizes the coalition for refusing to do so, pointing to a clear lack of cooperation on this issue. The coalition's attitude is deemed politically envious and out of touch with reality, thereby precluding any meaningful collaboration.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no willingness to compromise with the coalition, and we categorically demand their withdrawal to prevent the deepening problems facing the Estonian state. The similar concerns of colleague Seeder regarding the voting rights of third-country nationals are noted, pointing to potential opposition cooperation on certain issues.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is considered essential at the international level for monitoring the Baltic Sea and developing defense capabilities, underscoring the necessity of inter-state task forces. Domestically, he points to previous attempts to coordinate volunteer rescue services and the naval fleet, which were abandoned due to political instability. The current debate lacks any openness to compromise; instead, the focus is solely on demanding political will and funding.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is poor and confrontational, focusing on criticizing the government's policies and inaction regarding security matters. The speaker expresses no willingness to compromise; instead, they demand that the government drop the issue of the church law due to security threats. It is also mentioned that opposition colleagues contributed to the creation of the current situation in the past.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperation is being sought within the opposition ranks to table a motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister. The speaker is calling on members of the governing coalition (the Social Democrats and Eesti 200) to join the no-confidence motion, thereby demonstrating their lack of support for the Prime Minister. There is absolutely no indication of any willingness to cooperate with the governing coalition.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is purely confrontational and antagonistic. There is no reference to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity, with the focus remaining solely on protest and accusations.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker strongly urges cross-party cooperation and agreement to ensure the survival of the state. He emphasizes the need to stop obstruction and mutual blaming in order to achieve a common goal, and refrains from directly criticizing the Isamaa initiative, focusing instead on improving the process.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker supports close international cooperation among Russia's border states (Intermarium), which would include countries from Finland to Romania, with the aim of forming the first line of defense. There is no information regarding current inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise in the Riigikogu (Parliament); instead, reference is made to the collapse of the previous government, which prevented the plans from being implemented.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation with the government coalition is completely lacking; the speaker refuses a civilized debate until the coalition stops stonewalling. Positive reference and support are given to the legally justified positions of the colleague (Varro Vooglaid) on matters of constitutionality.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
No data available
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speeches lack references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties. The speaker is in complete opposition to the government and the bill's rapporteurs, even criticizing the selection of legal opinions.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
There are no signs of cooperation; the speech is purely confrontational and demands an answer to the question of why the government wants to maintain Russian influence. The speaker shows no openness to compromise, but instead demands that the opponents cease their activities.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
His style of cooperation is highly supportive of his opposition colleagues, particularly concerning the views of the Isamaa faction and finance specialist Aivar Sõerd, for whom he holds deep respect. There is absolutely no readiness to cooperate with the coalition, as their actions are viewed as deliberate abuse of power and a criminal offense, thereby precluding any compromise.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation. The statements are purely oppositional, demanding that the government change its policies and remove certain plans (e.g., the hate speech law) from the agenda.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses clear support for Varro Vooglaid and the bill he presented, indicating close cooperation with colleagues who share similar values. The style of cooperation is defensive, focused on supporting the bill's proponents against attacks from coalition members. Data concerning cross-party cooperation is absent.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
Direct cooperation is not being sought; instead, other opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE) are being warned about the potential blackmail threatening them from the government. Reference is made to previous successful international cooperation (the Norwegian government's support for the renovation of manor schools), which demonstrates a certain readiness for pragmatic partnership in pursuit of cultural objectives.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
No data available
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker stresses the necessity for and prior precedent of broad-based inter-agency cooperation, involving representatives of health institutions and the Ministry of Social Affairs. This indicates a preference for engaging multiple sectors in solving complex problems.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no evidence of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the style is entirely confrontational and demanding, focusing on exposing the incompetence and unethical behavior of opponents.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Data on the willingness to cooperate is absent; the speaker's position is purely confrontational and demanding toward the government, focusing on highlighting the government's mistakes and demanding accountability.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no focus on cooperation, apart from a reference to a previous statement by a party colleague (Martin), expressing solidarity. The attitude towards the government is entirely confrontational, and there are no references to seeking compromises or cross-party cooperation.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
No data available
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker emphasizes the need for cross-party consensus to solve the demographic crisis, much like the approach taken with national defense issues. He views the special committee as a tool intended to bring political forces, scientists, and stakeholders "under one umbrella" to find the optimal solution. However, he simultaneously expresses pessimism regarding the readiness of the coalition parties to support this consensus.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The style of cooperation indicates alignment with other opposition members (mentioning Urmas Reinsalu) who are also demanding specific answers. The primary desire for cooperation is aimed at the Riigikogu Board and the Council of Elders to consider a change in format, rather than finding compromises with the government.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The willingness to cooperate is low; the speaker expects the chamber to vote down the supported bill. He emphasizes the need to act as an independent sovereign state, not as a mere appendage of allies or organizations, thereby signaling a desire to avoid policies dictated by Brussels or Washington. He criticizes the one-sided nature of Estonia’s relations with the USA, which are channeled solely toward the "globalist liberal side."
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers approvingly to the speeches given by colleagues Mart Maastik and Kalle, demonstrating cooperation within their own faction or among like-minded colleagues. There is a complete lack of any indication of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the governing coalition.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity. The speaker demands an unequivocal position from the institutions (the President, the Chancellor of Justice) regarding their requested constitutional interpretation, which would rule out any political interpretation.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Willingness to cooperate is absent; the speaker asks direct and accusatory questions, casting doubt on the opposing side's intentions and their future prospects. There is no mention of compromise or bipartisan collaboration.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
A complete lack of willingness to cooperate; the style is purely confrontational and demanding. The speaker demands that the Speaker of the Riigikogu call the ministers to order, insisting that they behave properly and stop lying. There are no references to cross-party cooperation or seeking compromise.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is no data regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise, as the statements stem from the context of a heated debate surrounding a motion of no confidence, which emphasized the opposition's right to scrutinize members of the government.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
A cooperative style is absent; the speaker is in strict opposition to the coalition, calling on members of the coalition parties to reconsider their position and vote against the bill. There is no indication of seeking compromise or cross-party cooperation; the communication is confrontational.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Not enough data
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Cooperation with the ruling coalition is ruled out. The speaker notes that representatives of other opposition parties have also presented similar arguments against the government’s policy, pointing to a certain tactical united front within the opposition.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The cooperative approach is directed solely at fellow opposition members, who are called upon not to impede the government's errors, thereby accelerating the regime's demise. There is no indication whatsoever of any willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation with the government.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
There isn't enough data.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker publicly supports the views of colleague Helmen Kütt regarding the clear definition of costs and revenues for energy projects. There is a lack of openness concerning cooperation with the coalition; rather, the government is urged to invite new partners from the opposition if they cannot manage the country themselves.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
No data available.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Cooperation is entirely absent, as the speaker proposes removing the Reform Party from the hall, referring to it as a "criminal organization." This demonstrates extreme opposition and rules out any possibility of compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Willingness to cooperate is absent; the speaker expresses deep distrust towards the opposing side and concludes their participation by leaving the session as part of the faction's joint protest. There are no references to bilateral or cross-factional cooperation.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
There is a complete lack of willingness to cooperate; the speech is directed against the government and the minister, who are deemed incompetent and corrupt. There is no mention of any cooperation projects, coalitions, or readiness to compromise.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Willingness to cooperate is absent; the speaker is confrontational and accuses the opposing side of lacking principled commitment and engaging in activities that threaten the survival of the state. Instead of seeking compromises, the opposing party is required to deliver a clear and resolute political decision.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation is lacking; speeches have been delivered as questions and sharp criticism directed at the government or colleagues. There are no signs of a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is absent and confrontational. It is noted that even Isamaa, which holds similar positions, did not support the speaker's party's draft bill concerning the revocation of voting rights, citing a lack of broad support. The speaker focuses on confrontation and accusation, rather than seeking compromises.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The willingness to cooperate is completely absent; the style is purely confrontational and accusatory. The speaker focuses on attacking the opposing side and the failure to get responses, rather than searching for common solutions.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no willingness to cooperate with the ruling parties; the speaker represents the positions of the EKRE faction and is strongly in opposition. Regarding the draft bill on expense compensations, an opportunity is offered to process it and find a solution, but the overall tone is hostile and accusatory, particularly directed at the Reform Party.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation with colleagues or other political parties; the speaker concentrates on presenting their own positions and criticizing the system. They reference the concerns raised by other politicians (e.g., Kalle Laanet, Alar Karis) to bolster their narrative regarding the system's flaws.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The presenter sees solutions lying in the cooperation between the state and local authorities, suggesting the use of state bridge funding to tackle the housing problem. This indicates an openness to inter-governmental collaboration, particularly in achieving social objectives. Direct cross-party cooperation is not mentioned in the text.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Cooperation is absent; the speaker's position is purely oppositional and confrontational. Reference is made to the coalition's ability to push through bills ("blank check"), which indicates that compromise is ruled out.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is entirely opposed to the government and shows no readiness for compromise. The substantive address by the colleague (Anastassia) is noted and commended, indicating cooperation within the opposition ranks.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is cautious and suspicious, with accusations leveled against the coalition for arrogant behavior and failure to consult (for instance, regarding the issue of voting rights). Although solutions are being proposed, the coalition is immediately accused of avoiding substantive work and refusing to solve problems comprehensively, citing that the coalition is rejecting the opportunity for meaningful work that was offered.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The speaker continues the security topic raised by the second opposition MP (Varro Vooglaid), demonstrating cooperation in presenting issues within the opposition ranks. There is no indication whatsoever of any openness to compromise with the coalition; rather, the emphasis is that the coalition is rejecting the opposition's proposals.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational and critical, emphasizing the need to face reality without ideological bias. The only consensus mentioned was reached on a procedural matter (securing an extension). There are no indications of a desire to engage in substantive cooperation or make compromises with political opponents.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is being pursued with opposition parties, particularly the Centre Party, which is recognized for its substantive work in submitting parliamentary inquiries. The lack of dialogue with the ruling coalition is being criticized, with ministers being accused of failing to answer questions and demonstrating incompetence. No openness to compromise with the government is expressed; instead, the emphasis is placed squarely on exposing the government's failures.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The readiness for cooperation is low. The speaker points to successful past collaboration in the EKREIKE government, which featured innovative plans. While there are theoretical calls to discuss alternative solutions (for instance, different VAT percentages), the coalition is accused of refusing to engage in discussion and simply voting down proposals in a blunt manner.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is no willingness to cooperate; the style is purely confrontational and accusatory. The speaker protests and defends their own party and the Isamaa party against slanderous remarks, but active cooperation or compromise with other parties is not mentioned.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly emphasizes the urgent need for cross-ministerial and cross-party cooperation in guaranteeing public health, criticizing the government's current fragmented approach. Positive reference is made to earlier success stories, where collaboration (such as the launch of needle exchange points) resulted in HIV being brought under control.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no evidence of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the rhetoric is rather confrontational and critical of the system as a whole.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Regarding higher education policy, [he/she/it] expresses a desire to find a "golden mean" with university representatives, which signals openness to substantive discussion. On economic issues, [he/she/it] seeks potential consensus among all parties represented in the Riigikogu concerning the taxation of foreign banking and the promotion of domestic capital. Overall, the style is rather confrontational, but [he/she/it] seeks support for specific national and economic objectives.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker is acting as a harsh critic, demanding action and legislative initiatives from the government. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise or cooperate with coalition partners.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is no data available. The rhetoric is purely critical and oppositional, with no indications of seeking compromises or cooperating with other political parties.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates caution and a desire to avoid direct conflict with the Estonian delegation, choosing neutrality in order to maintain balance. This suggests they are seeking a compromise between personal opposition and collegial support.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker's style is purely confrontational and accusatory, focusing on condemning the motives and worldview of the opposing side.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker recognizes the value of the discussion and references the presentations of other colleagues (Lauri Luur), utilizing them as the foundation for their analysis. There are no direct references to openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation, although the discussion itself is open.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with other political forces.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The willingness to cooperate with the government is entirely absent. The actions of the coalition and the prime minister are considered to be in stark contradiction with national interests. Cooperation is mentioned only in the context of supporting one's colleagues (e.g., requesting additional time). It is emphasized that the Riigikogu has become an "absolutely irrelevant body," which precludes substantive debate.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation or readiness to compromise. All interventions consist of critical questions aimed at the government or the presiding officer of the session.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available.