Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
Interpellation Regarding the Need to Support Large Families (No. 339)
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on the cutting of benefits for large families and criticism of uncontrolled immigration policy. The position is value-based, emphasizing the right of our own people to a better life and future, contrasting this with the costs associated with immigration. The speaker criticizes the government's actions as the stripping away of benefits and rights.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of the decision to cut benefits for large families and draws a connection to the payment of social benefits to mass immigrants arriving from Ukraine. The focus of the analysis is the financial intersection of social policy and immigration. No specific data or statistics are presented; instead, the emphasis is placed on political connections.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is combative, accusatory, and sharp, employing rhetorical questions to expose the government's hidden motives. A strong emotional appeal is utilized, emphasizing the suffering of our own people and prioritizing those who bear the nation, language, and culture. The address is formal (being directed at a minister), yet its content is highly critical.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the Minister and the government, who face sharp criticism for cutting benefits for large families and for their uncontrolled immigration policy. The criticism is intense and accusatory, pointing to the government’s hypocrisy regarding the stripping away of rights. The opponent’s policy is specifically accused of causing suffering among our own large families.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is at the national level (Estonian families with many children, the bearers of our language and culture) and at the international level (mass immigration from Ukraine). The importance of preserving national culture and language is emphasized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker opposes the reduction of social benefits targeting large families, referring to the measure as a "decision to take away money." Their economic views emphasize the necessity of prioritizing the state budget to support its own people and the bearers of the nation, rather than covering costs associated with immigration.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The foreground is dominated by a strong anti-immigration stance, linking uncontrolled migration (from Ukraine) with cuts to social benefits. National identity and cultural resilience are heavily emphasized, pitting "our own people" against immigrants who fail to uphold these values. Furthermore, the rights of large families are defended.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is a critical assessment, delivered via an interpellation, of the government's past political decisions (specifically, cutting benefits for large families) and its immigration policy. The speaker is acting as an opposition questioner, demanding both clarification and accountability.
1 Speeches Analyzed