Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (290 SE)
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly centered on the exclusive right of the indigenous population (Estonians) to organize and direct Estonian life and politics, particularly through democratic elections. This stance is deeply rooted in values, emphasizing historical continuity, the contribution of our forefathers, and the inherent right to self-determination and statehood. The speaker is a staunch advocate for the restriction of suffrage, a principle that has been consistently maintained by their political group.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of public law disputes by referencing the opinions of constitutional law experts and the rejection of the draft legislation. They discuss legislative processes and precedents involving the withdrawal of rights (specifically, family benefits). The expertise provided is more conceptual and value-based, focusing on the right to national self-determination rather than technical legal analysis.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is passionate, identity-focused, and confrontational, employing strong emotional appeals (native people, the graves of ancestors, centuries). Contrast and rhetorical questions are used to underscore the irrationality and hypocrisy of the opposition's positions. The comparison to the "just like that" withdrawal of legally mandated family benefits is particularly sharp.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in Riigikogu sessions, participating in the first reading of Bill 290 SE by posing questions. Reference is made to their previous activity in past Riigikogu terms and recent participation in the Information Hour, where Kaja Kallas's positions were addressed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is directed at those who defend already granted rights, specifically highlighting the stance of Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. Criticism targets the government's political inconsistency and hypocrisy, given that legally mandated benefits were previously revoked "just like that," demonstrating that the removal of rights is indeed possible. Opposition is also directed at the constitutional law experts who rejected the draft bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style points to internal support, specifically citing reliance on Martin Helme's stances and the consistent backing of their political group for the principle in question. There is no mention of openness to compromise or cross-party collaboration; instead, the focus is on the consistent defense of their own position.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively national and conceptual, centering on the rights of the Estonian state and its indigenous people, as well as the organization of politics "in this land." Specific regional, local government, or international issues are not addressed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social theme is the association of the right to vote and the exclusive right to govern the state with the identity of the indigenous nation. The speaker contrasts the historical right of Estonians against everyone who "gathers here from any corner of the world," emphasizing the need to protect Estonian culture and the state.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the Draft Act on Amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act (290 SE). The speaker is a strong proponent and initiator of this bill, emphasizing the necessity of granting the indigenous population the fundamental right to manage their own lives.
2 Speeches Analyzed