Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" (557 OE)
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is heavily aimed at investigating activities related to COVID-19 vaccines and demanding accountability. The speaker sharply criticizes the expedited introduction of the vaccines to the market, deeming it potentially a crime against humanity and corruption driven by profit. This stance is value-based, emphasizing justice and the necessity of establishing the truth regarding the immense human suffering caused.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding vaccine testing standards (specifically, the absence of long-term studies) and the varying impact of different vaccine batches. Specific terminology is employed, referencing autoimmune diseases and the human experimentation program. The expertise focuses on the ethical and regulatory shortcomings of medical procedures during the pandemic.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly accusatory, emotional, and insistent, employing strong moral judgments ("crime against humanity," "absurd!"). Appeals are made to human suffering and personal stories (miscarriage, chronic health issues) to emphasize the gravity of the situation. Rhetorical questions are used to call into question the motives and ethical foundations of the vaccination campaign.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is limited to asking questions of a colleague during the first reading of the draft bill (557 OE) at the Riigikogu session. There is no data available concerning any other frequency or public activity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed at medical circles (specifically, family doctors who promoted mandatory vaccination), the pharmaceutical industry, and the decision-makers of the previous government. The criticism is intense, accusing them of crimes against humanity, corruption, and terrifying people through propaganda. There is no willingness to compromise; the implementation of the principle of accountability is demanded.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is supportive and focused on the colleague (Varro Vooglaid), who is posed questions designed to expand upon and deepen the topic he initiated. This indicates close collaboration in supporting the establishment of the investigative commission.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national policy (the activities of Estonian family doctors, the decision of the Riigikogu) and the international vaccine market and profit motives. Specific local or regional problems are absent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives are critical of the pharmaceutical industry, accusing them of a frenzied pursuit of profit and cutting costs on long-term research. It is emphasized that this drive for profit led to unethical and potentially criminal acts at the expense of public health.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues currently topping the agenda include public health, the protection of pregnant women and unborn children, and permanent health conditions linked to vaccination (such as autoimmune diseases). There is criticism directed at the use of fear tactics and propaganda ("protect your vaccinated grandmother") that pressured people into getting vaccinated, stressing the necessity of restoring truth and accountability.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on supporting the draft resolution (557 OE) for the formation of a Parliamentary investigative committee aimed at assessing the risks associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The speaker is a strong proponent of the initiative, demanding that accountability be enforced and the truth established.
2 Speeches Analyzed