By Plenary Sessions: Anti Haugas
Total Sessions: 27
Fully Profiled: 27
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
No data available
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary adversary is the EKRE parliamentary group, which faces heavy criticism for its absenteeism, failure to present draft legislation, and obstruction of the Riigikogu's work. The criticism is primarily procedural and behavioral, accusing them of turning serious business into a circus. Secondarily, the role of the Social Democrats is addressed concerning their proposals for disruption and the resulting media coverage.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It indirectly contrasts itself with previous governments that failed to regulate license plate recognition cameras at the legislative level since 2009, specifically naming Isamaa ministers (Marko Pomerants, Ken-Marti Vaher). It responds directly and defensively to questions posed from the floor, correcting misunderstandings regarding the bill's drafter and raising objections to Urmas Reinsalu's inquiries.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main criticism is directed at Tanel Kiik for his "ideological wandering." Strong opposition is aimed at the Swedish Social Democrats, who are accused of failing social integration, which has led to a tripling of the number of prisoners. The criticism is both ideological and based on policy outcomes.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation targets a draft law that permits hidden political advertising via the media and the associated tax avoidance. The criticism is strongly policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing the need for a fair tax environment and compliance with market conditions.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, who are accused of justifying war crimes and spreading foreign influence. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of removing allegiance to organizations that the Riigikogu has recognized as international terrorist organizations. Martin Helme's criticism regarding the late adoption of the law is largely supported.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the Isamaa party’s (Jaanus Karilaid’s) simplistic, black-and-white proposal to close the borders, which fails to take into account the situation of Estonian citizens. Opponents questioned the timing of the decision, asking why this measure wasn't implemented when Isamaa was actually in government. The criticism is primarily policy-based and procedural.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is aimed at Moscow Patriarch Kirill and his aggressive ideology. He is being called a war criminal and is urging support for the "holy war" against Ukraine. Criticism is also being leveled at local organizations, such as the Foundation for the Protection of Family and Tradition, which support the continued presence of Kirill's authority in Estonia. Opponents are being strongly labeled, with references made to their involvement in war crimes.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The criticism is directed towards other political parties and MPs who advocate for lowering the VAT rate, accusing them of rendering the state inefficient and enriching business owners. This criticism is purely political in nature, focusing on the measure's failure to meet its intended social goals.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no criticism or opposition. The speaker is working on refining and further developing the existing policy proposal.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed more towards procedural inaccuracy or terminological confusion, rather than specific individuals or policies. The criticism is procedural and low-intensity, with the goal of achieving correctness.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
There is no opposition, as the speaker mentioned that no opinions or amendment proposals were received regarding the draft bill. No criticism is being presented towards political opponents or opposing viewpoints.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
No direct opposition is voiced, but the committee chairman is critically questioned about whether the problem (the unsustainability of 24-hour shifts) had been discussed by the committee. This suggests political pressure and criticism regarding deficiencies in oversight.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speech does not feature direct political confrontation or criticism of specific opponents. The focus is rather on systemic challenges, such as the lack of instructors and training facilities in the police, rescue services, and defense forces.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The criticism targets the implementation of ineffective and expensive technical measures that would squander large sums of money without providing any real benefit. Specific opponents or groups are not named; rather, the political approach itself is being criticized.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed more at the system's long-term unsustainability and a societal trend (the decline of personal responsibility regarding pension savings), rather than targeting specific political opponents. The stance is policy-based, calling into question the viability of the existing system.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the EKRE faction, who are being directly criticized for submitting "sincerely obstructionist" amendments. The criticism is procedural, and a solution is immediately being offered (ending the taking of recesses), which demonstrates a desire to forcefully counter the obstruction.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker supports the rejection of the draft legislation concerning the official oath, emphasizing that there is no urgent problem and the existing oath does not contradict the constitution. Criticism is directed at the bill's initiators, who seek to increase the volume of legislative output without adequate necessity.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at institutional inaction, particularly concerning the National Broadcasting Service, which fails to feature the league's name and thereby deters sponsors. Political opponents or specific factions are not directly criticized; rather, the focus is on systemic shortcomings.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the solution proposed by the presenters of the specific draft bill (prohibition under the Law of Public Order), not against their goals, as it recognizes their desire to protect women. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that punishment is the wrong approach and that it may further isolate women from society, keeping them hidden from support organizations.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.