Agenda Profile: Anti Haugas
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure (695 SE)
2025-10-09
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political focus is currently on processing the draft law amending the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The attitude towards the draft is supportive, as it helps eliminate deficiencies that have led to the initiation of infringement proceedings. However, the amendments are described as concerning relatively minor details, which suggests a rather pragmatic and procedural approach.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Riigikogu's procedural rules and committee work, providing a detailed overview of the decisions and discussions of the Legal Affairs Committee. The substantive knowledge relates to infringement proceedings and amendments to the code, concerning which the speaker conveys information received from ministry representatives. Specific terms such as "infringement proceedings" and "procedural decisions" are used.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and strictly informative, typical of a committee rapporteur. The focus is on a chronological overview and the delivery of facts (who participated, what decisions were made). Emotional appeals are not used; the presentation is concise and procedure-based.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is related to legislative work, including participation in the Justice Committee session on September 22nd. The speaker will serve as the rapporteur in the Riigikogu chamber on October 8th, demonstrating active involvement in the processing of draft legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct opposition, but mention is made of Peeter Ernits's question concerning fines and infringement procedures, which suggests that critical questions were raised within the committee. The criticism is aimed at the state's failure to act in remedying the deficiencies, rather than the content of the draft bill itself.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is collegial, emphasizing the contribution of the other parties (the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Markko Künnapu, and representatives of the Ministry of Justice) to the commission's work. Consensus was reached within the commission on procedural decisions, indicating smooth cooperation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and international relations, particularly concerning European Union infringement procedures. There is no regional or local emphasis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The treatment of social issues is limited to amendments to criminal law and the penal code necessary to ensure compliance with EU requirements. Specific positions regarding broader social issues are not presented.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the swift processing of the draft Act amending the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure (695 SE). The speaker is the rapporteur for this draft Act and supports concluding the first reading in order to eliminate the shortcomings that form the basis of the infringement proceedings.
1 Speeches Analyzed