By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi
Total Sessions: 75
Fully Profiled: 75
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Severe criticism has been leveled at the Centre Party and Isamaa, who are accused of spreading fear-mongering and disregarding the necessity of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) tool. Isamaa representative Urmas Reinsalu is criticized for procedural passivity, as arguments were only presented during the third reading. The speaker calls the opponents' credibility into question, favoring the opinion of PPA specialists.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is directed at the government and the minister, whose tax policy is considered to increase inequality and is highly controversial. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, calling into question the government's priorities and the ethics of its choices.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the political parties who argue that the license plate recognition system goes too far and unduly infringes upon personal liberties. The speaker dismisses the "surveillance society" rhetoric as inappropriate and accuses opponents of exploiting emotional appeals. He clearly contrasts the Social Democrats' stance with that of the other parties, who do not view the security advantages as sufficient.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the coalition over the suspension of the license plate recognition system and the ensuing legislative chaos. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the government of making a "hasty" decision and being in a state of "disarray," which ultimately benefited criminals. The speaker's objective was to pressure the government and the coalition into taking quicker action.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The main confrontation is with the President of the Republic and his legal advisor, who are challenging the constitutionality and legal clarity of the law. It also addresses the deep constitutional doubts raised by other deputies (e.g., Varro Vooglaid). The confrontation is political and juridical-procedural, but a compromise with the President is not deemed necessary, sending the conflict to the Supreme Court for resolution.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism targets the actions of the government (or the minister) regarding delays in the development project and the resulting loss of investments. The objection is both procedural and results-oriented, questioning whether statutory restrictions were the cause of the investment hindrance. The intensity of the criticism remains moderate, centered on obtaining a response supported by objective data.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the lack of political will that has stalled the processing of the financial ombudsman bill since 2022, leaving it on the shelf gathering dust. Furthermore, there is sharp criticism of irresponsible activity in the non-bank credit market, which exploits borrowers' low awareness and encourages them to fall into a debt cycle.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker criticizes the government (the ministers) for focusing on tax cuts (car and income tax) at the expense of the Health Insurance Fund's deficit. He questions the government's capacity or willingness to commission an impact analysis regarding financial stability, citing the larger staffing resources of the ministries compared to the parliamentary factions.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is taking an oppositional stance regarding the government's financial management, criticizing its inability to handle large sums and referencing the previous issue involving a 10 million euro advance payment. The criticism targets the effectiveness of the government's operations and demands accountability.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the coalition's tax policy, which stands accused of exacerbating inequality and worsening conditions for the elderly. This is substantive criticism of the policy itself, highlighting that residents of Tallinn and more affluent municipalities are the ones who benefit most from the tax reform. The speaker is calling on the Regional Minister to intervene to ensure a more balanced outcome.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main criticism is directed at the government and the coalition, especially Minister of the Interior Igor Taro regarding internal security issues. The criticism is both political (gun policy, prisoner agreements) and procedural, citing an "irregular approach to solutions" and inter-ministerial discord (Ministry of the Interior vs. Ministry of Justice) concerning the draft bill for the number recognition system.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Interior Minister's decision to shut down the license plate recognition cameras, which is viewed as a severe blow and a mistake for Estonia's security. Ideologically, they oppose those who view the national anti-fraud action plan as excessive interference or the promotion of a "nanny state." Regarding religious matters, the opposition is directed against the Moscow Patriarchate, viewing it as an institution that justifies the ideology of violence.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed against the government's actions and process management (specifically the prison lease issue), particularly regarding the inadequate public consultation and the ignoring of concerns raised by security institutions. The opposition is procedural and policy-based, demanding improved procedures and the resolution of concerns before the agreements are signed.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition is directed at the Reform Party-led government due to its unequal tax policy and the severe skewing of regional policy. Furthermore, the Centre Party (Lauri Laats) is sharply criticized for hypocrisy regarding kindergarten placement fees, with critics highlighting their previous failures and omissions while they were in power. The criticism is both political and historical-procedural, accusing opponents of incompetence and exacerbating inequality.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The main opponent is the Reform Party (often dubbed the "Prime Minister's party") and the Prime Minister personally, who is accused of allowing regional policy to die out. The criticism is intense and centers on political unfairness, particularly the preferential treatment given to Tallinn in social and tax policy.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is aimed at the government and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for halting the system and failing to provide solutions. Criticism is particularly sharp regarding the Interior Minister's premature decision and the coalition's internal dysfunction (specifically, the Ministry of Justice's opposition to the Ministry of the Interior's draft bill). The criticism is primarily procedural and political, highlighting the immense waste of time.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for failing to support the bill and for the political discord between the Tallinn and national levels. The criticism focuses on policy and procedure, accusing opponents of inaction and unreasonable rigidity in refusing to grant the necessary powers to Mupo (the Municipal Police). The speaker faults the government for failing to offer alternative solutions or address the problem.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at policies that rely on market forces and systemic government failures that have deepened the crisis. Specific criticism targets the current government's decision to raise VAT, which adds thousands of euros to housing prices. The state's ongoing practice of selling land for quick profit is also being criticized.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Minister of Social Affairs, who are accused of failing to make decisions and dragging out projects. The criticism is procedural and political, stressing that even after the removal of the coalition's "known brake," no progress has been made. The speaker considers further deliberation and analysis to be mere delaying tactics.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the Russian Federation, which is being criticized for its violations of international law and its disregard for conventions. This disregard makes continued adherence to these conventions dangerous for Estonia. Criticism is also being leveled at those who urge against withdrawing from the Ottawa Convention. While their concerns are acknowledged, the country's defense capability is being prioritized.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main dispute is with the legal counsel to the President of the Republic, who challenged the wording of the bill and the guaranteeing of religious freedom, even though the law's objective was not disputed. (The speaker) criticizes political rhetoric that attempts to frame the law's objective as being directed against nuns or Orthodox believers, calling it political rhetoric.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the political decision to reduce political accountability in the administration of courts and in budgetary matters, which represents a policy-based opposition to the government's current direction. One speaker also expresses direct disagreement with a colleague's position regarding the necessity of the political role.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main confrontation is with the Minister of the Interior and his party colleagues (e.g., Tarmo Tamm), whose positions on increasing the number of weapons are criticized as dangerous. The speaker refutes claims that the Social Democratic Party previously sought to bureaucratically harass gun owners. The criticism is directed at the safety aspects of the policy and the lack of transparency regarding the government’s objectives.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker’s opposition is aimed directly at fraudsters and their helpers ("mules"), whose lives he wants to make tougher through legislative changes. Criminal activity is described as "evil" and "despicable." The political opponent is not directly criticized; instead, questions are asked about the government’s plans.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly concerning their controversial fiscal plans (expensive reform versus cuts). Separately, attention is drawn to the stance of coalition partner Margus Tsahkna regarding social benefits and pensions being unaffordable, demanding clarification on the scope of these proposed cuts.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is directed at the government's actions and performance, particularly regarding long-term procedural delays in the adoption of legislation and setbacks in regional policy (school closures). Opposition is also aimed at the introduction of foreign labor in a situation where Estonia is unable to train its own people.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct opposition or criticism is expressed; the speaker limits themselves to presenting the facts. It is only mentioned that the motion to conclude the second reading received three opposing votes, but the motives of those opponents are neither analyzed nor criticized.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the discussion led by the Ministry of Culture, given that the topics of e-sports and the gaming industry have "not surfaced there at all." This is a moderate, issue-based opposition to the focus of the current debate, and not a personal attack.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the Reform Party, whose "dogmas" and "narratives" are viewed as obstacles to fact-based policy-making and price reduction. Furthermore, the specific respondent (Mr. Laats) is criticized for failing to provide a substantive answer and for simply reading from notes. The critique targets both the political substance and the procedure itself.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Justice, citing the violation of social dialogue, ineffective legislative drafts, and a bureaucratic approach. The criticism is intense, focusing on both procedural and substantive errors, such as the conflict with the European Court of Justice ruling found within the draft Employment Contracts Act. Furthermore, the state's initial statements regarding the Pihlakodu case are also criticized for having offended the public's sense of justice.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the president's earlier decision to veto the law, citing its unfair justification. The legislative process is also indirectly criticized for creating a situation where citizens are forced to appeal to the administrative court. The criticism is both political and procedural.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition primarily consists of the contrasting viewpoints put forth by the Centre Party faction and Riigikogu member Varro Vooglaid. The criticism is directed at both procedural issues (Vooglaid's motion to suspend the reading) and substantive matters (the Centre Party's proposed amendments failed to gain support in the committee). The speaker rejects the assumption that churches would refuse to comply with Estonian laws, deeming this an unlikely scenario.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The standoff is aimed at the initiators of the legislative changes and the minister, who is being criticized for his lack of trust in security agencies. The minister is also indirectly attacked concerning his past decisions and his ability to handle economic matters. The criticism is primarily procedural and outcome-based, casting doubt on the necessity of the new legislation.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The direct political opponent is not criticized, but the speaker successfully opposed the desire of the Tax and Customs Board and the Ministry of Finance to rapidly expand surveillance powers. The opposition was both procedural and principled, arguing that it was unreasonable to process such a substantive issue as an amendment to a single bill; instead, the process should begin with a preliminary drafting intention. He rejects the question that linked the necessity of the bill to the Reform Party's transport issues.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes two political parties seeking to quickly scrap the draft law on party financing from the Riigikogu. He forcefully rejects the opposing side’s (referring to EKRE) allegations that the ERJK serves as a punitive body for a single party, stressing the committee's non-partisan composition and the fact that elections are held.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government and the Ministry of Climate, criticizing their inability to present essential data and calculations. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the government's inefficiency, noting that the government has been severely taken to task for this failure.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at Patriarch Kirill and the Moscow Patriarchate, who are accused of hijacking the Orthodox faith for political ends and supporting Russia’s military aggression. In the context of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), he/she specifically names two committee members (Varro Vooglaid and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart) who voted against supporting the draft legislation.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Centre Party, specifically Andrei Korobeinik and their opposition strategy. The criticism focuses on strategic inefficiency, accusing the opposition of submitting draft legislation created "with the help of AI," which lacks genuine support even among their own members. Furthermore, he sharply criticizes the former Centre Party leadership (Ratas, Aab, Kiik, Hanimägi), referring to it as a "terrible party at that time."
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct political opponent is criticized, but the speaker expresses strong opposition to the former practice where the early release of dangerous foreign detainees took place without substantive checks and purely for the sake of financial savings. This criticism is aimed at unjust procedures which deeply offend the sense of justice and jeopardize public order.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponent is EKRE, whose draft bills are sharply criticized for both their substantive irresponsibility and their procedural sloppiness. The speaker accuses EKRE of outright lying regarding the budget impact, claiming that 400 million is "no money at all," and of ridiculing the entire issue. Criticism is also aimed at the bill's technical errors, such as the use of the wrong VAT rate (5%).
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker directly criticizes the opposition party Isamaa (and Jaanus Karilaid) for criticizing the cuts but failing to propose specific sources for those cuts in their alternative draft bill. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric, faulting the lack of constructiveness in the budget process.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Direct personal criticism is not leveled, but the speaker opposes those who wish to amend the Constitution based on emotion or short-term political expediency. There is clear opposition to the second constitutional amendment bill, which would grant voting rights through international treaties, citing its impracticality and lack of legal clarity. The position that a passport alone demonstrates loyalty to Estonia is also criticized.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is primarily directed at procedural and practical issues, such as the correctness of the Chancellor of Justice's activities and the impact of the amendment on the courts' workload. Specific opposition was presented by committee members Anti Haugas, Valdo Randpere, and Vilja Toomast, who voted against concluding the first reading. The speaker addresses the counterarguments factually, without resorting to personal attacks.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the rapporteur who seeks to repeal Section 151¹. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the opponent of appealing to nationalism and utilizing inappropriate anecdotal evidence. The speaker questions the opponent's failure to provide a solution should the regulation be abolished, and rejects the assertion that the regulation itself is responsible for the issues encountered in its implementation.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The objection is directed at the speech given by the Isamaa party, criticizing the irrelevance of its content and its deviation from the subject matter of the bill processed in the Legal Affairs Committee. The criticism is procedural and concerns the selection of topics introduced by Isamaa (main infrastructure routes, tax burden, electricity supply).
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed against Mart Maastik's draft bill, which is criticized due to its legal-technical flaws and the violation of legal certainty. The criticism is strong and is based on the government's 11-point negative opinion, which suggests the bill's constitutionality is questionable. In his rebuttal, he defends the committee's position that the draft bill does not solve the problem.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There are no direct attacks or criticism aimed at the opposing sides; the speaker focuses exclusively on conveying the consensus and procedural decisions that prevailed within the commission. He notes the confusion that arose in the chamber regarding the issue of intoxicated persons, but corrects the record neutrally.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Opposition is mounted against right-wing parties who are concerned about the cap on parental benefits. Furthermore, the Social Democrats' rejection of an alternative that would have reduced the parental benefit period is highlighted, thereby pointing to a broader political confrontation regarding social issues.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The direct opponent is not criticized; however, a pressing need is emphasized to resolve the 'confusion' that has arisen either within the legislation itself or during the interpretation of the draft bill. The criticism is aimed at the procedural ambiguity, which risks creating a false impression regarding the bill's objectives.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no opposition. The focus is on implementing the policy and achieving procedural clarity, rather than criticizing opponents. The discussion of the draft focused more on the details of inter-agency cooperation than on political confrontation.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is not aimed at specific political opponents, but rather at systemic flaws that allow injustice to occur. He/She criticizes the situation where the suffering of the innocent is possible, calling it "concerning."
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the common belief that the state is bloated and overstaffed with officials, while defending the internal security sector from excessive optimization. The speaker warns that reducing the internal security sector below a critical threshold threatens the security of the Estonian state. No direct political opponent is criticized; rather, the funding for the sector is being defended.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
Criticism is directed at the banking sector for high interest margins and showing insufficient solidarity. Additionally, regret and frustration are expressed towards the ministries, which have left the establishment of a financial ombudsman unresolved, citing a procedural obstacle. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the detriment caused to consumers.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is directed at the government's foreign policy actions concerning Georgia, as this appears to be an abrupt and unjustified change in direction. The criticism targets the political justification and the necessity of explaining to the public why the Estonian Foreign Minister has taken a stand against the Georgian government.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker describes in detail the legal dispute between the Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Chancellor of Justice regarding the existence of a constitutional infringement concerning procedural assistance. In the second speech, caution is expressed regarding "malicious individuals" who might exploit exceptions to environmental restrictions.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed more at the widespread notion that national debt is safe or insignificant, referencing the naïve question, "So what?" posed by those in the discussion. Specific political opponents or groups are neither named nor criticized.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at previous governments ("the various people in the government here on my left hand"), who are accused of failing to conduct the regular valuation of land for 20 years. This inaction, in the speaker's estimation, has caused the painful impact of the current land tax. Regarding nuclear energy, he criticizes the bill's proponent for illogical policymaking, where support precedes research.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
There is not enough data.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available. The address is a neutral commission report that contains no criticism or confrontation toward any political group.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at banks that close accounts without substantive argumentation, citing only laws (the Credit Institutions Act or the Law of Obligations Act), and at the system that makes taking legal action too expensive. The officialdom is also mentioned for legally hindering the establishment of a financial ombudsman, citing various viewpoints.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), which initiated the debate, and previously the Centre Party, which is accused of running a long-term campaign against e-voting. The criticism is intense and political, arguing that the opponents' doubts stem from unfavorable election results, not facts. The speaker believes that this activity poses a direct threat to democracy, as it calls the legitimacy of the government into question.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are those members of the Riigikogu who are attempting to defend the controversial statement issued by the Russian community and do not support the proposal mentioned by the speaker. The criticism is intense and ideological, calling into question the opponents' understanding and loyalty. The speaker asks directly if the opponents grasp who or what they are actually standing up for.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker criticizes the political indecision and questions the thoroughness of the solution presented by the rapporteur concerning alternatives. The criticism targets both the substance and the procedure of the policy, given the lack of clear options and sufficient analysis.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There are no references to opponents or criticism; the entire focus is instead placed on acknowledging the work of the government and the minister, and highlighting the positive impacts of the draft legislation.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Indirect criticism is being leveled at the government, referencing the hope that the Estonian Minister of Economic Affairs will be more successful regarding investments than his Latvian counterpart. The criticism is aimed at the effectiveness of the government's performance and the insufficient visible progress.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism targets the underfunding of healthcare and the lack of systematic management, pointing toward the inefficiency of existing policy. No specific opponents or political groups are criticized by name; rather, the focus is on the lack of solutions.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the bill and the rapporteur, who seek to impose restrictions on participation in local elections. The criticism is intense, focusing on the unjustified nature of the policy and the limitation of people's choices. The speaker questions the elevation of political parties as the foundation of society and points to their inherent instability.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party and Priit Sibul, who advised against supporting the flexibility bill. The criticism is policy-based, accusing opponents of obstructing progress and the inefficient use of taxpayer money, a problem that has persisted for over a decade. There is also general criticism directed at state-level duplication and the handling of matters that are simply beyond Estonia's capacity.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
It does not directly criticize any opposing side or political grouping, but emphasizes that providing military aid is an action that "everyone should do."
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at banks, which are accused of earning excessive profits at the expense of borrowers and demonstrating insufficient solidarity with society. He/She indirectly criticizes the agreement reached within the coalition regarding the replacement of the bank tax, deeming it questionable due to the timing and the reduction of capital. Furthermore, he/she rejects the criticism from Martin Helme (EKRE) regarding the Social Democrats' alleged 180-degree reversal on the bank tax issue.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Direct opposition to the minister is not being expressed; rather, the criticism targets the process of implementing the reforms, which has led to a sharp conflict between communities and local governments. It is noted that top politicians are also involved in this dispute, which points to the high-level nature of the problem.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is not criticizing or opposing specific political groups or individuals. The criticism is aimed at the ambiguous details of the draft bill, not its initiators.