By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi
Total Sessions: 75
Fully Profiled: 75
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker identifies as a Social Democrat and emphasizes successful cooperation with stakeholders (including the Chancellor of Justice and the Data Protection Inspectorate) in the Legal Affairs Committee in order to achieve a compromise. He/She demonstrates a pragmatic approach by supporting the bill initiated by four members of the Riigikogu, despite the fact that the government's original draft legislation was rejected.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasized the successful collaboration with institutions, noting that the Ministry of Justice, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Data Protection Inspectorate have reached a very good compromise on the draft bill. This demonstrates a readiness for institutional cooperation and for resolving concerns during the bill's deliberation process.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker operates from the opposition, employing pressure tactics directed at the government, yet simultaneously stresses a fundamental consensus regarding basic rights and proportionality. They are also willing to commend politicians from the opposing side when warranted, and note that the opposition's rhetoric may have contributed to the birth of a new bill drafted by coalition members.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The text describes the cooperation with the Ministry of the Interior and the Council of Churches regarding the supplementation and clarification of the draft legislation. It acknowledges the existence of disagreements (8 votes in favor, 2 against in the committee) but stresses the committee majority's support for adopting the bill without amendments. It views referring the matter to the Supreme Court as a normal resolution for the conflict between the parliament and the president.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is seeking cooperation with the Chancellor of Justice to define the necessary legal safety framework and discuss existing bottlenecks. He/She calls for the topic to be debated on the floor of the Riigikogu, indicating a readiness for collegial legislative work.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The cooperative style is highly appreciative and grateful toward the Financial Supervisory Authority, praising their systematic supervision and contribution to consumer protection. Political cooperation is focused on achieving a broad consensus within the Riigikogu (Parliament) regarding the establishment of a financial ombudsman, stressing that this would benefit consumers, credit providers, and the judicial system alike.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is acting as the representative of the Steering Committee, neutrally presenting the committee's discussion and the voting results (5 in favor, 4 against), which reflects a cross-party split. He refers to the questions raised by colleagues (Mr. Kaljulaid, Mr. Ernits) and the positions held by government representatives (Mirjam Rannula), thereby demonstrating procedural cooperation.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker underscores the necessity of inter-ministerial cooperation, specifically between the Minister of Social Affairs and the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, to resolve complex ethical and legal issues concerning end-of-life regulations. He calls for a public debate and the search for societal consensus, indicating a desire for a constructive discussion.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker’s actions demonstrate cooperation with colleagues in their faction or party, such as when submitting interpellations with six members of the Riigikogu. They also act as the initiator of the Legal Affairs Committee. There are no direct references indicating openness to cross-coalition compromise; the focus remains on opposition oversight.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the need for broad cooperation and coordination between ministries, the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), and the private sector (the Banking Association, telecom companies) in the fight against fraud. He/She commends a colleague (Valdo Randpere) for his active contribution and engagement within the Legal Affairs Committee and calls for avoiding political "tug-of-war" when addressing important security issues. He/She remains open to amendments aimed at improving the draft legislation during the proceedings.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker references previous cooperation and discussions within the Legal Affairs Committee, which demonstrates a willingness to address the topics within the committee's framework. The current approach is critical, demanding improved processes and greater transparency, which points to a desire for better cooperation in the future.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker stresses that the Finance Committee failed to support any of the Social Democrats' proposed amendments, suggesting limited cooperation on economic matters. Conversely, as the rapporteur for the Legal Affairs Committee, emphasis is placed on the consensus-based procedural decisions made to advance the draft bill, demonstrating a willingness for procedural cooperation and the acceptance of the Ministry of the Interior's explanations.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
There is insufficient data.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The current collaborative style is confrontational, criticizing the coalition's internal capacity for cooperation and its general indecisiveness. However, hope is expressed that when it comes to restarting this crucial system, the Riigikogu will be able to look at things rationally and make a swift decision.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cross-party cooperation, pointing to the Tallinn City Government’s unanimous support for the draft bill, irrespective of political affiliation. They mention the Social Democrats’ backing of a similar draft proposed by the Centre Party and call on other local municipalities (such as Tartu) to unite in order to exert pressure on the government. They view the proposed legislation not as a political issue, but simply as a sensible solution.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, as the speaker praises the previous government and minister for the reconstruction program of smaller apartment buildings. This demonstrates a willingness to acknowledge good policies regardless of who initiated them.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
It refers to previous cooperation between the Ministry of Social Affairs and the City of Tallinn in carrying out the necessary analyses. The speaker represents the position of the Social Democrats (SDE), stressing their specific commitment to advocating for the Tallinn Hospital project. There is no mention of current readiness for cross-party compromise; instead, the focus remains on pressuring the government.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The cooperation style is pragmatic and regional: it is mentioned that the Social Democrats support the bill, citing cross-party backing on the security issue. Furthermore, the text emphasizes that similar conclusions have been reached with neighboring countries (Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland), which indicates regional political alignment.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Cooperative, emphasizing the committee's consensus decisions and its readiness to amend the law in order to address the concerns raised by the President regarding legal clarity. It refers to the shared opinion of the Ministry of the Interior and members of the Legal Committee concerning the feasibility of security aspects. The goal is to find a solution that satisfies both security needs and the requirements for legal clarity.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style shows a readiness to voice disagreements with colleagues ("Contrary to the colleague"), indicating an independent position. Data is lacking regarding broader cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other factions.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker urges open and constructive cooperation during the discussion of the Arms Act, particularly regarding the reduction of bureaucracy. He confirms readiness to discuss the rules with hunters and members of the Defense League, provided it concerns improving the conditions for existing gun owners.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker’s style is geared towards cooperation, posing questions to the minister and requesting the ministry’s input on the proposed solutions. He/She seeks to establish shared instruments and an action plan with the government to reduce fraud, referencing the need to consolidate best practices.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker directly refers to the issues raised by other colleagues (Reili, Tanel Kiik, Rene Kokk), continuing their discussion and building their own questions upon those points. This suggests cooperation and coordination of topics within the faction or the opposition.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is consensual and compromise-oriented, particularly within the Legal Committee, where an amendment concerning the effective date was adopted by consensus. The speaker references questions raised by colleagues (such as Priit Sibul), demonstrating an openness to further discussion and clarification.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is addressing the minister directly, seeking constructive cooperation and concrete solutions to support the sector. The aim is to secure support and resources from the executive branch for the development of a new field.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker positively references previous cooperation within the government, specifically noting where the Social Democrats initiated a crucial analysis. The current tone is demanding, questioning whether the ministry and the minister today intend to continue the work started by their predecessors.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker stresses the necessity of comprehensive engagement in the legislative process, particularly regarding social dialogue with social partners and trade unions. Looking ahead, wide-ranging cooperation is foreseen between ministries, the police, the Financial Supervisory Authority, telecommunications companies, and banks for the development of an anti-fraud action plan.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to collaboration and is actively seeking counsel from the Chancellor of Justice to find a legally correct solution for amending the law. The goal is to achieve an exception that "actually becomes law," which indicates a desire to find a compromise or a legally sound solution.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is structured and committee-based, highlighting the alignment of proposals put forward by the Ministry of the Interior and Riigikogu members Riina Solman and Priit Sibul. Although the representative of the Center Party participated in the deliberations, their proposals failed to gain support in the committee. This indicates that a compromise was only partially achieved, and the direction favored by the majority was ultimately preserved.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker acknowledges a broad consensus on security matters, but remains challenging and skeptical regarding specific legislative solutions. Their style of cooperation is rather critical, seeking out legal loopholes and avoiding unnecessary bureaucracy, and they are prepared to question both rapporteurs and ministers.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperative approach is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing that the majority of the proposed amendments were supported by consensus within the committee. The speaker detailed close collaboration and discussions with representatives from the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Finance, and the Ministry of the Interior in order to reach a compromise. The final decision concerning surveillance authority was a compromise intended to ensure that the core objective of the draft bill could move forward.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is open and procedure-focused, describing detailed discussions held in the Legal Committee with representatives from the Ministry of Justice and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker acknowledges that the draft bill concerning the financing of political parties has deficiencies and expresses hope and readiness to improve it both in the Riigikogu chamber and in the committees.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasized cooperation between the ministry and stakeholders, especially the Council of Churches, whose proposals were taken into account during the drafting of the bill. In the committee, there was consensus support for the appointment of the rapporteur, which indicates a readiness for procedural cooperation.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly stresses the necessity and value of compromise, calling it the art of democracy. He defends participation in the coalition as the only way to achieve, even partially, the goals outlined in their electoral platform. Collaboration is described as a complicated process where no one ever gets 100% of what they want.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is highly cooperative, commending the Ministry of Justice, including both the current and former minister, as well as the Legal Affairs Committee for the work they have accomplished. The speaker also recognizes the committee's representative, Valdo Randpere, which demonstrates a willingness to support substantive reforms across party lines.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker emphasized cooperation within the coalition, highlighting the substantive work done by Social Democrat Minister Piret Hartman in analyzing the value-added tax (VAT). While concern over food prices is shared with the opposition, cooperation on EKRE's draft bill is ruled out due to its poor quality and irresponsibility.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker supports and defends the work of the coalition, stressing that getting the state budget in order requires a collective effort and unpopular decisions. They view tackling juvenile delinquency as a complex issue that demands cooperation across the social, health, and justice sectors.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, as all four amendments initiated by the committee were adopted by consensus. The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the ministries and inspectorates (the Ministry of Justice, the Financial Supervision Authority, the Chamber of Notaries), whose proposals were essential in shaping the draft legislation.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes constructiveness and a readiness to compromise, viewing these as the foundation of politics and democracy. The Social Democrats' position is described as constructive and cautiously optimistic, and there is a call to seek significant common ground here in this chamber. The necessity for broad-based discussion and consensus is stressed, both within the Riigikogu and in society at large.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is consensual and procedure-centric, emphasizing that several decisions (e.g., the deadline for amendments and the appointment of a representative) were made consensually within the Legal Affairs Committee. The support of the Government of the Republic for the principles of the draft legislation is noted, and the different narratives discussed in the committee are also highlighted.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker’s style is direct and polite, acknowledging the opposing side’s address ("Thank you, esteemed rapporteur, for those kind words about me!"). Although a dialogue is taking place, it is rather confrontational and focuses on dismantling the opponent's arguments, instead of seeking compromises on the question of repealing the regulation.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates a strong collaborative style, emphasizing the achievement of consensus and a willingness to compromise with various interest groups (the Banking Association, the Chamber of Bailiffs, the Ministry of Justice). The Committee considered the proposed amendments by consensus, ensuring that all parties were satisfied.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is consensual and institutional, emphasizing that the decisions made by the Legal Affairs Committee to reject the draft bill were reached consensually by all participating members. Furthermore, collaboration with experts from the Ministry of Justice is crucial, as their comprehensive opinion is considered decisive.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker highlighted the strong cooperation and consensual decision-making process within the Legal Affairs Committee, pointing out that all procedural decisions were adopted unanimously. This demonstrates an openness to cross-party collaboration in legislative procedures. The cooperation involves both members of the committee and officials from the Ministry of Justice.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation emphasizes intra-party unity and swift action (the Social Democrats' rejection of the alternative). The speaker addresses the minister directly to receive precise confirmation regarding the substance of the legislative amendment, which demonstrates a willingness to engage in dialogue with the government.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is cooperative, supporting a joint discussion and review of the topic to find a solution to the existing confusion. They express a willingness to "look over" the matter and do whatever is necessary to achieve clarity. The possibility of involving the Ministry of Justice is mentioned.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The collaborative approach is consensus-based, stressing close inter-agency cooperation (ministries, KAPO, MTA) in the development of the draft legislation. The Legal Affairs Committee’s decision to conclude the first reading of the bill was consensual, indicating both an openness to compromise and widespread support.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The cooperative approach seeks an inter-institutional solution, directly asking which body (the Chancellor of Justice, the Riigikogu, or a minister) should assume responsibility for resolving the issue. It expresses the hope that problems can be solved.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasizes cooperation, highlighting the strong relationship between the Ministry of the Interior and the Estonian Defence Industry Association, which is crucial for involving Estonian companies in national defense. Furthermore, there is a call to strengthen communities and expand volunteer systems (such as volunteer police officers and rescue workers) to achieve a safe and cohesive society.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker is collaborative, thanking the agencies and supporting their consumer-centric approach. Strong support is expressed for the creation of the Financial Ombudsman institution, noting that this issue enjoys widespread support among other politicians and judges present in the chamber. Recent successful legislative steps were also acknowledged.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is insufficient data.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperation is described internally within the commission, where members were able to find common ground in recognizing the existence of the problem, even though opinions diverged regarding the constitutional infringement. The commission’s decisions are made by vote (3 in favor, 2 against), which indicates disagreements.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker refers to collaboration with colleagues, mentioning the defense industry support group led by Raimond Kaljulaid, thereby demonstrating a readiness to tackle issues within working groups. They are also interested in cooperating with government institutions, inquiring whether business concerns are being heard and if the Economic Affairs Committee has been approached.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is highly consensual and collegial, emphasizing that all procedural decisions in the Social Affairs Committee were made unanimously and by consensus. He reports on the cooperation with both the Minister of Social Protection and the officials of the Social Insurance Board during the discussion of the draft bill. He was himself appointed as the representative of the lead committee.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker expresses clear support for the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and thanks him/her for raising the issue. Colleagues are urged to continue the discussion regarding the establishment of a financial ombudsman, citing the readiness for inter-institutional cooperation (involving the Chancellor of Justice and the Financial Supervision Authority) in finding solutions.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker references previous coalition experience, noting that EKRE had the chance to thoroughly audit the e-voting system while they were in government, but they failed to find any evidence of fraud. This demonstrates a willingness to weaponize political history to discredit opponents. There is no direct expression of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation in the current debate; instead, the necessity of preserving e-voting is stressed.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker clearly supports the rapporteur's position and the proposal around which the debate revolves. The collaborative style is supportive towards those who share concerns about the dangers of the Russian World ideology. Information regarding broader coalitions or a willingness to compromise is lacking.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker addresses the presenter, seeking further information and a more in-depth analysis of the alternatives. The tone is demanding, but the objective is to arrive at a better, more informed collective decision, stressing the necessity of "seeing the process through to the end" in the decision-making.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperative style is highly supportive and appreciative, praising the work of the government and the Minister of Health while emphasizing the contribution of state institutions. The speaker stresses inter-institutional cooperation, citing as an example the joint contribution of the employer and the state in compensating the wage gap. He/She also refers to positive collaboration within the Social Affairs Committee, where draft legislation aimed at improving the situation of patients and family doctors is currently being discussed.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker expresses a desire for inter-ministerial cooperation, asking directly how the Minister of Economic Affairs ensures that the workforce meets the necessary requirements "in conjunction with the Minister of Education." This suggests an expectation that solutions will be developed through intra-governmental partnerships.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the necessity of collaboration and oversight within the legislative process. He suggests that the decision-making framework must involve a "symbiosis" between the Minister of Culture, the Cultural Endowment (Kultuurkapital), and the Riigikogu Culture Committee to guarantee both transparency and carefully weighed decisions.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
It underscores the necessity of deepening cooperation between Estonia and Ukraine in the areas of humanitarian assistance and social support. The approach is geared towards collaboration, actively seeking opportunities to expand existing aid measures.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasizes the role the Social Democrats played in the coalition by proposing the bank tax, which demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with their coalition partners. At the same time, he/she acknowledges that the proposal failed to gain support within the coalition, indicating the necessity of making compromises. He/she stresses that the issue of solidarity will remain on the agenda for the SDE going forward.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker starts by expressing support for the presenter’s general principle concerning gender inclusion in addressing the issues faced by target groups. The style of cooperation is open and inquisitive, aiming for a better understanding of the draft legislation and ensuring public health security.