By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal
Total Sessions: 145
Fully Profiled: 145
2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is heavily focused on defending the constitutional order, setting it in opposition to the directly applicable regulations of the European Union. The speaker raises the issue of conflicting obligations, stressing the critical importance of freedom of speech and assembly. This is a values-based stance, which specifically challenges the Ministry of Justice’s interpretation of the EU regulation’s scope.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance centers on strict adherence to constitutional principles, particularly concerning the procedure for declaring martial law and mobilization. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the current process, stressing that it violates Article 128 of the Constitution, which grants the Riigikogu (Parliament) a decisive role in authorizing the use of the Defense Forces. This position is clearly oriented toward established rules and the fundamental principles of the rule of law. The statement concludes with a somber reference to the disregard shown for the constitution.
2025-11-04
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is strong opposition to the pending international agreement concerning financial obligations assumed by the Estonian state and the constitutional procedure for its ratification. The political focus centers on procedural correctness and the accusation that the opposing party is concealing information and being dishonest regarding cost coverage. The stance is intensely confrontational, criticizing both the policy itself (the scale of costs) and the execution (transparency).
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional to the government's actions, which increase the financial burden and administrative complexity for citizens. Injustice towards the poor and the elderly is highlighted, criticizing the failure of draft legislation intended to raise subsistence benefits and pensions. The rhetoric is value-based (justice, constitution) and condemns the government's activities, accusing the coalition of reaching into the taxpayer's pocket.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is on two issues: democratic representation in the presidential Electoral College and the mitigation of wind energy impacts. On the issue of representation, he/she strongly supports restoring the number of electors to the previous level (160+) in order to enhance democratic principles and better represent the population’s views. Regarding energy policy, the stance is highly critical of the existing mitigation measures and safety studies (infrasound), deeming them insufficient and outdated.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly focused on protecting constitutional freedoms and opposing monopolies. The speaker opposes the wholesale pharmaceutical monopoly and the corruption associated with it, and is categorically against the draft legislation that would increase security at the expense of freedom. The political framework is value-based, emphasizing the supremacy of the constitution and warning against the threat of a digital concentration camp.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is split between procedural correctness during the Riigikogu session and ensuring social justice in how the budget is allocated. The speaker heavily criticizes the government's priorities, starkly contrasting the salary increases for officials with the plight of those receiving subsistence benefits. The stance is strongly oppositional, targeting the government's incompetence (specifically citing incorrect data) and injustice. The focus is largely performance-driven, highlighting the government's mistakes and poor choices.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position centers on strong opposition to the car tax, which is viewed as contrary to the will of the people and a violation of the constitution (specifically, the inviolability of property). This opposition is intense and value-driven, framing the methods of taxation as a repressive policy analogous to Soviet-era forced collectivization.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker's political position strongly defends independence and sovereignty, opposing the ceding of decision-making authority to the European Union and international agreements that restrict Estonia's freedom. Another central theme is the protection of citizens' fundamental rights and privacy against the national surveillance system (license plate recognition cameras), which the speaker deems unconstitutional. These stances are value-based, appealing to the timeless independence enshrined in Article 1 of the Estonian Constitution.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The political position is highly critical of the decline in security (specifically, confirming departure from residence via simple email) and the restriction of consumer 'right to repair' rights, viewing the latter as primarily serving the interests of major manufacturers. Criticism is also leveled at the ineffective scheduling and work time planning by the Riigikogu Board. The focus is heavily directed toward improving the substance of policy and the overall organization of parliamentary work.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on public resistance (supporting the teachers' strike) and tax hikes. Strong opposition to the escalation of the war in Ukraine is emphasized, warning of the danger of a Third World War. The political framework is both value-based (freedom, forgetting the legacy of servitude) and results-based (manipulation of ratings). The speaker calls upon the nation to forget its "genes of servitude" and rise up against the government.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly focused on protecting the constitutional order and civil liberties, opposing government bills that are deemed unconstitutional and seen as a blueprint for establishing a totalitarian society. The political framework is guided by core values and the principles of the rule of law, lending strong support to the legal assessment provided by the Office of the President. The speaker emphasizes that decisions must not be made "based on feelings," but rather on the basis of professional expertise.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The political stance is strongly focused on protecting the privacy of sensitive personal data and bank accounts from unauthorized access by state authorities. The speaker demands legal accountability and sanctions for officials who have unlawfully accessed this data, emphasizing strict adherence to the principles of the rule of law. This position is highly critical of the state's actions, which have failed to notify tens of thousands of individuals. The primary focus is directed toward improving government operations and ensuring the state adheres strictly to the law.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political focus centers on criticizing healthcare and evidence-based policy, particularly concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. The speaker strongly opposes the minister's rigid narrative, stressing that science and medicine are constantly evolving. He/She refers to a previous shift in his/her own stance, noting that in 2023, his/her statements regarding vaccine injuries were acknowledged as true upon the passing of the relevant legislation.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political stance focuses on monitoring the work organization and procedures of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The speaker expresses concern or surprise regarding the low attendance at the session, calling into question either the size of the Riigikogu's composition or the legitimacy of the session. The focus is more on the institution's functionality than on specific political values.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political focus is heavily centered on issues of national defense and internal security, particularly the inadequate capability for drone detection. The speaker sharply criticizes the situation, which they believe allows Russia to arm the "fifth column" operating in Estonia. This stance conveys deep concern and demands explanations from the government, framing the issue as a critique of security deficiencies.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker's position is strongly oppositional and populist, focusing on legally and procedurally challenging the actions of the government and the Riigikogu Board. The main themes include violations of law in Parliament, false statements made by ministers, and the defense of the people's rights (e.g., opposition to the car tax, support for the teachers' strike). The political framework is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the principles of the rule of law and the restoration of parliamentary dignity.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the protection of constitutionality and the principles of the rule of law. The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft anti-money laundering law because it violates personal inviolability and turns all citizens into potential subjects of criminal proceedings. The stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing that the Riigikogu has repeatedly committed "serious blunders" in adopting unconstitutional laws.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is vehemently opposed to the legislative bill expanding the powers of the Money Laundering Data Bureau (RAB), which is being viewed as the emergence of a totalitarian society. This stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing constitutional rights, personal integrity, and the sanctity of property against state surveillance. The speaker demands the immediate rejection of the bill to prevent state encroachment upon privacy.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance strongly focuses on protecting families living in sparsely populated areas from service fees imposed by local governments (LGAs) for services they do not actually utilize. The speaker criticizes the system, noting that while LGAs have the right to grant exemptions from these fees, they lack the financial motivation to do so, demanding legal mechanisms to safeguard citizens' rights. The position is firmly aimed at protecting citizens' rights against the financial limitations faced by local governments.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional to the government, criticizing their economic policy and the quality of their legislative work. The speaker frames the situation in the country as unbearable, even referencing a quote from Lenin and the necessity of revolution. The main issues are opposition to tax increases and the violation of the constitutional order, with the criticism aimed squarely at the government's stupidity or outright malice.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The political stance focuses heavily on adherence to legislative procedures and constitutionality. The speaker opposes the abuse of the Riigikogu's right to self-organization, stressing that established norms must restrict the power of the governing coalition. The position is fundamentally procedural and strongly emphasizes the principles of the rule of law.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance centers on strong opposition to the illegal state surveillance being carried out by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) using license plate and facial recognition cameras. The speaker emphasizes the principles of the rule of law and views the government's attempts to amend the legislation as evidence of the police's prior unlawful activities. This position is strongly value-driven, warning against the dangers of a surveillance society and demanding accountability. The objective is to halt the use of illegally collected evidence in criminal proceedings.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political positions are heavily focused on defending Estonia's sovereign right to decide against European Union directives (specifically regarding the changing of the clocks) and prioritizing public health. He/She is firmly opposed to the deployment of anti-personnel mines due to humanitarian considerations, stressing the necessity of preventing civilian casualties. Furthermore, he/she defends the free mandate and immunity of a member of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), criticizing the muzzling effect of the ERJK (Political Party Financing Surveillance Committee) system. His/Her political framework is strongly value-based, emphasizing independence and the welfare of the people.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political focus is currently on strengthening the enforcement and compliance of language requirements for platform service providers (taxi drivers). The speaker strongly refutes the minister’s assertion that there is a low number of complaints, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue and the necessity of eliminating violations of language requirements. The political stance is firmly directed towards the enforcement of regulations and adherence to the law.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The most prominent issue is the transparency of Rail Baltic's ownership structure and the actual owners. The speaker is highly skeptical of the information provided, demanding specific and verifiable data (company name, business registry code). This is a results-oriented and political framework that focuses on the accountability of the national project.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the risks and inadequate regulation of wind energy (wind turbines), emphasizing threats to both energy security and public health. Strong criticism is leveled against the current system, which fails to guarantee sufficient reserve capacity and conceals health impacts. The discussion is primarily policy- and performance-based, focusing on the system’s inefficiency and costs.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the actions of the government (the Reform Party) in the areas of sovereignty, the economy, and social policy. The most acute issues are the selling off of Estonia's resources, tax increases, and the implementation of Brussels' dictates, against which the public is called upon to resist. The political platform is strongly value-based, emphasizing the constitutional order and the role of the people as the ultimate source of power.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is firmly focused on ensuring clarity in lawmaking and guaranteeing equal treatment. The speaker vehemently opposes the use of discretionary authority in the enforcement of the law, arguing that it creates the potential for unequal treatment of individuals and is therefore hazardous. This stance is policy-driven and underscores the principles of the rule of law.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political position is strongly regulatory, demanding equal requirements for all participants in the taxi services market to ensure consumer protection and fair competition. He/She emphasizes that the current situation, where differing requirements are in force, violates the constitution and the principles of the rule of law. The stance is deeply rooted in policy and values, aiming to protect traditional service standards.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition, centered on the government's flawed performance and the adoption of unconstitutional legislation. The speaker stresses that the Riigikogu is failing to implement the will of the Estonian people and, consequently, demands the organization of snap elections and the dissolution of parliament. The focus is heavily directed toward the poor performance of the government and the coalition, and the lack of democratic legitimacy.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition, centered on the constitutionality and procedural correctness of draft legislation. The speaker objects to the motor vehicle tax, deeming it at least partially unconstitutional, and demands clarification regarding the necessity of amending the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, in the context of public health, emphasis is placed on the lack of national-level knowledge concerning the dangers posed by wind turbine infrasound. The overall framework is heavily focused on policy and legal norms.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on strong opposition to the car tax, which is being treated as a procedural and legal violation. The speaker encourages citizens to challenge their tax notices in administrative court to halt the implementation of the tax. The stance is strongly policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing the violation of the secondary law, specifically the rules of good legislative practice.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position focuses on the clarity and validity of electoral procedures, emphasizing that the rules for marking the ballot are "very important." The position is strongly procedural, seeking a precise interpretation of the rules regarding whether only a cross or also other symbols (a circle, a triangle) are permitted.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political position focuses strongly on ministerial accountability and parliamentary procedural integrity. The speaker emphasizes that ministers whose status as Riigikogu members has been suspended are expected to provide honest answers, as they are not covered by the immunity of free speech granted to parliamentarians. This stance is aimed at scrutinizing government activities and ensuring legal accountability, raising questions about the possibility of challenging false statements in administrative court.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly focused on preserving Estonia's independent decision-making capacity, opposing the excessive binding nature of decisions made by the Council of the European Union. The speaker criticizes the draft legislation, which, in their assessment, will lead to the loss of autonomous decision-making rights. They employ a strong value-based framework, comparing the situation to the example of Moscow during the Soviet Union era.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The political focus centers on national defense and wind energy regulation. The politician prioritizes military security and support for reservists, positioning this stance against the subsidization of wind turbine construction by foreign firms. He advocates for suspending turbine operations until adequate safety regulations are established, thereby demonstrating a strong value-based commitment to safety and national priorities.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the insufficient compensation of reservists and ensuring the will to defend, emphasizing that the state owes a moral debt to its soldiers. The speaker sharply contrasts this with the inaction of the Reform Party government and the priorities set by Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur, placing human resources ahead of "metal" (meaning military hardware/equipment). He demands immediate solutions, not just government promises that push the problem off until 2026.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the bill currently under consideration, arguing that it will accelerate the demise of the Estonian people through increased immigration and the assimilation of migrants. The political focus is centered on demographic recovery and boosting the birth rate, treating this as a priority amidst economic upheaval and instability. These stances are primarily value-based, concentrating on national survival and the concept of "pure Estonianness."
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most critical issue is Estonia’s acute fertility problem. The speaker strongly supports establishing a task force for population reproduction under the Government Office to address the demographic crisis. This stance is policy-driven, emphasizing the necessity of structural solutions based on the recommendations of researchers.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political stance centers on intense skepticism regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines (especially AstraZeneca), based on the official package insert and the lack of science-based data for specific age groups. The speaker presents an extremely critical and value-driven framework, questioning whether this was a project intended to reduce the human population, referring to the vaccines as weapons of mass destruction. This position stands in strong opposition to the narrative promoted by the government and medical experts.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The political position strongly centers on institutional accountability and securing the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) in relation to the government. The speaker forcefully demands that members of the government must report to the Riigikogu, and stresses strict adherence to the law governing the status of a Riigikogu member. This position is value-based, emphasizing the protection of constitutional values and parliamentary authority.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker takes a firm stance against the construction of wind farms, emphasizing the lack of knowledge concerning their health impacts and referencing WHO guidelines. The political position is aimed at criticizing the government's actions and accountability, demanding specific answers from ministers and accusing them of negligence regarding the health of the Estonian people. Another key focus is the strict observance of parliamentary procedure, requiring the session chair to fulfill their obligation in ensuring that answers are provided. These positions are strongly value-based and critical of the government's activities.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on two main issues: protecting the interests of farmers regarding damage caused by nuisance species (migratory birds and wild animals), and strong skepticism toward the science and political decisions promoted during the COVID-19 pandemic, often referred to as potential "pseudoscience." A pragmatic approach to lawmaking is preferred, ensuring that good ideas are not killed off due to legal deficiencies. The skepticism concerning the political bias of science is strong and value-based.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is the strong opposition to amending the constitution in a way that would extend voting rights in local elections to EU and NATO citizens. The speaker deems this amendment dangerous and foolish, stressing that the constitution is the bedrock of the state and is not something to be trifled with. He criticizes the use of political situations as a pretext for constitutional change and maintains that the amendment is a complete failure. This position is strongly value-based, centered on the preservation of the Estonian language and culture.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position centers on strong opposition to the actions of the Minister of the Interior, which are viewed as an unconstitutional policy of closing or restricting churches. The speaker emphasizes the principles of the rule of law, particularly the presumption of innocence (Section 22), contrasting them with political prejudgment. The stance is strongly value-based, defending constitutionality against potential over-regulation by the executive branch.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political position opposes the massive development of wind energy, emphasizing that the government is violating the Atmospheric Air Protection Act by permitting the construction of pollution sources exceeding 250 meters in height. The stance is strongly critical, focusing on the violation of the law and the protection of human health and the natural environment. The government's actions are deemed a failure and unlawful.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political platform is staunchly anti-government, centered on the detrimental impact of wind farm development on public health and the government's dictatorial conduct. They also take a firm stand on defending the Riigikogu's rules of procedure, accusing the session chair of arbitrarily misinterpreting the law. These positions are articulated with extreme intensity and urgency, demanding the prime minister's resignation. The policy framework is strongly value-driven (the protection of citizens' rights) and outcome-based (the decline in health).
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on international security issues, particularly questioning the causes of the war in Ukraine and pointing to a possible link with NATO expansion. Strong emphasis is placed on parliamentary procedure and protecting the freedom of speech of Riigikogu members against improper conduct by ministers. The stance is value-based and focuses on calling into question the conduct of officials and the official narrative regarding foreign policy.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly centered on the principles of the Constitution and the rule of law, emphasizing the role of the people as the bearer of supreme power. The fiercest opposition is directed against the growth of unlimited power among officials and the poor quality of legislation produced by the governing coalition. The stance is value-based, demanding adherence to general principles of law (e.g., the prohibition of retroactivity) and supporting the intervention of the Chancellor of Justice.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on the preservation of the Estonian language and the strict enforcement of the Language Act. The speaker criticizes the government’s actions, deeming the implementation of the law unsystematic and inadequate, and stressing the necessity of conducting a "thorough vetting." The stance is strongly value-based, linking language preservation to migration policy and economic issues.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is characterized by strong opposition to the scientific consensus, which is framed as a mental illness. This position is intensely value-driven and focuses on personally discrediting the experts rather than conducting a substantive analysis of the policy itself. The speaker casts doubt on the scientists' mental health, asking which psychiatric hospital they were discharged from.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The political position centers on strong opposition to unequal taxation (the car tax), emphasizing the constitutional basis for the equal treatment of individuals. Internationally, the speaker opposes the statement concerning the Georgian elections, demanding legal evidence for the alleged violations. Domestically, the stances are directed against the injustice and illogicality created by the state.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political stance is fiercely critical of the government's failure to regulate the infrasound and noise pollution generated by wind turbines. The speaker stresses that the current Public Health Act does not guarantee the safety of citizens and accuses the government of negligence regarding both public health and the environment of Estonia. This issue operates within both a policy-based framework (due to legal shortcomings) and a value-based framework (concerning health and safety).
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance strongly focuses on improving public health, backing a bill that provides people with better opportunities for restoring their health. The presentation of this position is value-driven and emotionally charged, highlighting the bill's clear positive impact. The speaker positions themselves as an advocate for public health, thereby making any opposition morally questionable.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political position heavily focuses on procedural justice and strict adherence to the rules governing the Riigikogu session. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the actions of the presiding officer, accusing him of brazen and unjust behavior that prevented a question from being posed to the minister (Michal). The framing is clearly directed against the presiding officer's actions and potential partiality.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
This political stance focuses heavily on the transparency surrounding the use of public funds and the accountability of state officials. The speaker forcefully opposes the current unequal scrutiny, where the expense compensations for members of the Riigikogu (Parliament) must be fully transparent, yet the compensations for ministers, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Prosecutor’s Office remain classified. This position is value-based, stressing the necessity of equal transparency across all institutions operating within the public interest.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is one of strong opposition to the development of wind farms, especially given the lack of knowledge regarding their potential harm to human health. It is stressed that proceeding with detailed planning and public debates without understanding the health hazards constitutes both a procedural and an unethical error. The position is strongly rooted in policy and values, focusing on the protection of public health.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on the unjust distribution of resources and favors among political factions, employing the metaphor of Santa Claus. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the Reform Party, labeling their membership as abnormal. The criticism is directed at the system's unfair operation, specifically noting that EKRE and the "aknaalused" (marginalized groups) have been left without the necessary "gifts."
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on the procedural irregularities in wind energy development and the associated invisible health risks (infrasound). The speaker strongly opposes the government's actions, which permit the construction of wind turbines before the Health Board and the Ministry of Climate have developed adequate understanding and solutions regarding these hazards. The position is highly critical of the government's actions and timing, emphasizing that risk assessments must precede construction.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the current procedure for adopting European Union legal acts, viewing it as potentially unconstitutional. The speaker emphasizes parliamentary sovereignty and criticizes the delegation of powers to the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK), demanding a legal clarification. The framework of this position is strongly value-based, focusing on guaranteeing constitutionality.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional regarding the government’s economic management, which is described as incompetent and having "run into the ditch." It sharply criticizes the disregard for the fundamental principles of basic taxation and the sidelining of advice from economists. Another key issue is the protection of public health, specifically the failure to address the dangers posed by wind turbine infrasound, leading to demands for the immediate cessation of construction. The criticism is thus aimed both at economic policy and the lack of expertise concerning public health.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The political position is moderately skeptical regarding the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, emphasizing that a system protecting children's rights has already been in place in Estonia for a long time. The main concern is related to legal complexity and the potential abuse of the complaints submission system by parents. The stance is strongly policy- and value-based, focusing on the actual protection of the child and the functionality of the legal system.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the government’s tax policy and the expansion of the use of the Defence Forces in foreign missions, particularly in the context of Ukraine. The central framework is the detrimental nature of the government’s actions toward the Estonian people, affecting them both economically (through excise duty hikes) and physically (sending people to war, the health impact of wind turbines). These positions are sharply contrasting and value-based, emphasizing national defense and the welfare of the populace. The political stance is aimed at blocking the government’s activities and issuing a warning to the public.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the protection of human health and the safety of the living environment. The speaker strongly opposes the planning and construction of wind turbines until standards meeting modern needs for regulating infrasound and low-frequency noise have been developed and implemented. He criticizes the government's actions, where construction is proceeding ahead of the development of safety requirements.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position centers on protecting children from pedophiles, strongly opposing a draft bill that allegedly allows convicted individuals to work with children again. The viewpoint is intensely value-driven, emphasizing a moral duty and an evolutionary responsibility toward one's offspring. The speaker accuses the coalition of deliberate lying and favoring pedophiles, which demonstrates strong opposition to the government's actions.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly procedural and value-based, opposing any amendment to the constitution driven solely by the immediate political situation, while emphasizing the constitution's role in guaranteeing national-cultural and peaceful coexistence. The speaker is a staunch opponent of the bill under consideration, arguing that it fails to meet the standards of sound legislative practice and proper legal drafting technique. They stress the necessity of adhering to established principles and values during the process of constitutional creation.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The political position focuses on the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and the issue of the rights of non-affiliated members. The speaker strongly emphasizes that the current rule, which permits only factions to speak during the third reading, unfairly excludes nearly a quarter of the members from the debate. This stance is aimed at ensuring procedural fairness within the parliament.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the repeal of Section 151¹ of the Penal Code, as, in his view, it has been repeatedly abused by the police against Estonian nationalists and patriots. The stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing the violation of the principles of the rule of law and the suppression of national sentiment. He sharply criticizes key government figures and the actions of the police, which, in his estimation, have turned into a political police force.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s fiscal policy and state budget, which are viewed as destructive to Estonia. The central issue is the illegality of the budget and the associated new taxes (car tax, property tax) that reduce the public's income. The speaker believes that parliamentary avenues for improving the situation have been exhausted, necessitating public intervention via a general strike. The position is strongly value- and results-driven, focusing on protecting the assets and income of the populace.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The most crucial issue is the failure of critical infrastructure (the blowing up of a viaduct) and the associated government accountability. The political stance is heavily focused on evaluating the government's actions and demanding compensation for damages suffered by citizens due to the power outage. Raising the issue of compensating these losses is clearly aimed at assessing the government's effectiveness in resolving the crisis.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government's proposed legislation, particularly when these proposals include hidden amendments related to state oversight. The speaker stresses the need to protect Estonia's mineral resources (phosphorite, rare earth metals), referring to them as "Estonia's crown jewels," and accuses the government of concealing the true facts from the public. This stance is deeply value-based, prioritizing national sovereignty and safeguarding resources against foreign influence.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional stance on healthcare funding matters, particularly concerning the funding of abortions and the reduction of cancer drug prices. They criticize coalition members of parliament and medical scientists regarding their priorities and competence. The political framework is value-driven, focusing on moral choices (abortion versus cancer treatment) and the incompetence of their opponents.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker heavily focuses on socio-economic issues, strongly advocating for a reduction in VAT on foodstuffs to 5% to ease the financial burdens faced by the Estonian people. He is also critical of Rail Baltic’s strategic resilience in the event of a serious conflict, arguing that the infrastructure would be easily destroyed. His political stance is defined by direct criticism of the government's actions and the political ratings of the opposition.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax increases (especially the car tax) and the breaking of election promises. The focus is on criticizing the government's actions and political integrity (specifically, lying), highlighting the untrustworthiness of the Reform Party and Eesti 200. The position is strongly results-oriented and values-driven, centering on political dishonesty.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oriented toward defending the sovereignty of the Riigikogu, criticizing ELAK for overstepping its authority during the transposition of European Union directives. The speaker expresses deep skepticism regarding the official climate change narratives, viewing them as a massive business plan for the sale of CO2 quotas and wind turbines. Their focus is value-based (specifically, the constitutional order) and procedural.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centering on alleged violations of rule of law principles (specifically, the presumption of innocence) and sharp criticism of the government’s economic policy (the tax system). The most intense resistance is aimed at the concept of social gender, which is dismissed as "utter nonsense" and a social deviation. The focus operates within two frameworks: one value-based (the constitution, traditional sexes/genders) and one criticizing the government’s actions (economic protests).
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on legal and political disputes, particularly regarding the unjustified raising of fine rates. The speaker calls into question the ethical fitness of the Minister of Finance, citing a conflict of interest and a personality disorder. Furthermore, strong opposition is voiced regarding the harmonization of European Union regulations, which, in the speaker's assessment, limits Estonia's sovereignty and independence.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is on the constitutional protection of property rights. The speaker adopts a strong, value-based stance, arguing that the current legal provision limiting the terms of alienation is unconstitutional because it infringes upon the inviolability of property (Article 32 of the Constitution). It is stressed that the Constitution must also be applied in practice, ensuring the equal protection of property.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s actions and specific legislative proposals, particularly concerning prison logistics, highlighting significant additional costs and the fact that the Riigikogu (Parliament) was kept uninformed. A core value is the linkage between national security and the well-being of the populace, emphasizing social satisfaction as a key metric for evaluating government performance. The speaker questions the government's capacity to ensure the welfare of the people, citing widespread protests and planned strikes. The underlying framework is heavily performance-driven and values-based.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government's budget cuts, arguing that they are devastating the economy and will lead to widespread strikes. He/She emphasizes the negative repercussions of the government's actions on both internal security and the economy, specifically highlighting the administration's poor performance. The political stance is fiercely oppositional, directly linking the budgetary policy to the social and economic crisis.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on resisting tax hikes and criticizing the government's handling of the budget. The politician stresses the necessity of directing substantial allocated funds toward struggling social and cultural sectors. The criticism targets the government's inconsistency and its failure to uphold past promises, framing the matter as both a policy failure and a question of core values (honesty).
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on protecting citizens' rights and ensuring honest governance. The speaker firmly opposes raising medical fees (for visits, prescriptions, and hospital stays), citing a violation of the Constitution, and sharply criticizes the removal of the educational requirement for the State Secretary, labeling it a corrupt bargain. The platform is strongly value-driven, emphasizing constitutionalism and the principles of the rule of law.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position heavily emphasizes government accountability, demanding the criminalization of false statements made by ministers as a measure to prevent anti-state activity. Furthermore, the politician supports social justice, initiating a bill to exempt pensioners and other beneficiaries from paying the hunting fee. His/Her policy is aimed at ensuring honesty and protecting the welfare of contributing citizens, while sharply criticizing "deceitful globalist politics."
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to government-backed mega-projects, such as Rail Baltic, which are viewed less as serving the public good and more as a vehicle for exporting Estonia's natural resources and raw materials. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes specific traffic management solutions (rubber bollards), deeming them serious impediments to traffic flow. These viewpoints are presented through a framework of intense criticism and suspicion (based on both values and results).
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political platform is fiercely anti-government, leveling accusations of corruption and claiming the government is turning Estonia into an economic periphery by ceding natural resources to foreign capital. There is a strong emphasis on protecting national natural resources and ensuring compliance with Article 5 of the Constitution. The political framework is founded on values (sovereignty) and outcomes (the failure of the current government).
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position focuses strongly on defending democratic values and constitutionality. The speaker questions the suitability of the Riigikogu Board, referencing the accusation that they are an “authoritarian regime chatbot,” which constitutes a strongly value-based criticism. Furthermore, sharp criticism is leveled against an international agreement that appears to contradict the principle of the territorial scope of the Penal Code.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The political position is sharply critical of the government's actions, particularly concerning the procedural handling of the Lihula monument, demanding accountability and truth. It also voices deep concern over the influx of foreign capital and the cheap acquisition of Estonian land for establishing wind parks, while simultaneously backing a draft law aimed at restricting this. The focus is heavily value-driven (protection of national wealth) and procedural (principles of the rule of law).
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The most prominent topic is national defense and the security situation, which is framed by the credibility of the government's communication. The speaker adopts a critical stance toward the Minister of Defense's categorical statements regarding the timing of the war's commencement, deeming them alarming. The focus is on a results-oriented and trust-based framework, demanding clarification of the source of the published information.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The political focus is directed towards the handling of historical monuments (the Lihula monument) and the legal grounds associated with this issue. The speaker questions the legal basis for the monument's confiscation, relying on a previous expert assessment commissioned by the police in 2004, which ruled out the presence of Nazi symbolism. The position taken is strongly procedural and focused on legislation, demanding an explanation from the government regarding the disregard of existing law.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is placed on food security, which is being treated as a highly topical and critical issue, with reference also made to discussions at the European Parliament level. The speaker is strongly opposed to the removal of subsidies intended for farmers, arguing that this jeopardizes the sustainability of agricultural businesses and the nation's food security. This position is heavily policy-driven and underscores the existential threat involved.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The political focus is directed at the legality and constitutionality of the presiding officer's actions, presenting strong opposition to the procedure by which the draft bill is being handled. The speaker stresses the necessity of intervening in the presiding officer's allegedly unlawful activities, utilizing legal remedies to do so. Their position is strongly procedural and oriented toward the defense of the constitution.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is firmly against the vehicle tax, viewing it as manipulation and unconstitutional because it jeopardizes the preservation of technical cultural heritage. They emphasize the defense of Estonian sovereignty, sharply criticizing the actions of the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK) as a violation of the rights of the parliamentary plenary session and the use of a "back door." The speaker's framework is both value-based (cultural heritage) and procedural (constitutionality).
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political stance centers on strengthening ministerial accountability, offering firm support for a draft law that would criminalize lying in the Riigikogu (Parliament) in specific circumstances. This position is driven by the actions of the previous administration (Kaja Kallas's government) and is heavily focused on improving governmental ethics and transparency. The stance itself is primarily results-oriented and guided by ethical principles.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is strongly opposed to the proposed car tax bill, which is being framed as a historical injustice akin to Stalin’s forced collectivization. Criticism is directed at the government’s inability to manage the state budget, emphasizing the necessity of caring for the Estonian people rather than distributing funds indiscriminately. This stance is intensely value-driven (preservation of cultural heritage) and results-driven (the government’s lack of financial competence).
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the Land Tax Act, emphasizing its unconstitutionality (specifically regarding Section 154) and the infringement upon the autonomy of local governments. This stance is framed on a values basis (constitutionality) and is intensely critical of the government's actions, accusing it of ignoring the populace. The overall policy direction is fundamentally opposed to the government's tax policy.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The politician's position is strongly opposed to the introduction of nuclear energy in Estonia, emphasizing the danger posed to Estonian territory and the serving of foreign corporations' interests. He also expresses profound distrust regarding the legality of electronic voting, citing widespread public skepticism and the Supreme Court's refusal to uphold the complaints filed. His standpoints are deeply rooted in values, focusing on protecting the state and the nation from major risks. Furthermore, he criticizes the Riigikogu Board for procedural errors.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position is firmly set against interference in the internal affairs of other nations, stressing the absolute nature of sovereignty and a value-based approach. He considers the statement under discussion detrimental, as it only serves to escalate an already tense global situation. The position is highly confrontational and questions the utility of the statement, arguing that, in the speaker's view, it is utterly pointless.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, especially the car tax, which is framed as part of the implementation of a broader "neo-communism" and globalist agenda. The speaker stresses the need to protect private property and the Estonian people's desire to be masters of their own destiny, calling for massive resistance and the ousting of the government. The framework is strongly value-based and ideological, linking the tax hikes to an international network of influence.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance centers on government accountability and the Prime Minister's presence during the Riigikogu information session (Question Time). A critical and procedural question is being raised regarding the reasons for Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's absence, emphasizing the transparency of the government's activities. The framework of this position is clearly results-based and procedural.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political focus centers on criticizing the government's actions and failures within its IT systems—for instance, the non-operation of the Land Board's (Maa-amet) new system, which is seen as a major obstacle to providing services to citizens. Robust opposition is aimed at violations of the principles of the rule of law, demanding verification of the legitimacy of parliamentary (Riigikogu) decisions and citing the oath taken to protect the constitution. The criticism is primarily results-oriented and values-driven, accusing the Reform Party of employing tactics akin to authoritarian methods.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position heavily focuses on defending the presumption of innocence against media and public condemnation, viewing it as a crucial fundamental right. Furthermore, the speaker expresses strong skepticism regarding the competence of the Riigikogu Finance Committee, accusing them of making decisions detrimental to the state. The emphasis on the role of maturity and life experience in political office is also significant. The speaker's overall approach is strongly values-based and legalistic.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is centered on the principles of the rule of law and procedural transparency, particularly concerning the level of detail in court hearing protocols. He criticizes the past practice of the electoral commission, where the protocol underpinning the decision was inaccurate and incomplete, stressing the necessity of adhering to the Administrative Procedure Code. The position is heavily procedural and aimed at institutional performance.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position centers on guaranteeing the uniformity and secrecy of elections, while maintaining strong opposition to e-voting. The speaker argues that e-elections violate constitutional principles (citing concerns over identity verification and the potential for vote alteration) and demands their abolition. The political framework is heavily value-based and procedural, focusing on ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political position strongly focuses on the legality of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) Rules of Procedure and adherence to procedural norms, sharply opposing the exceeding of committee mandates. The second main focus is national sovereignty and security, which is highlighted in the draft bill amending the police officer's oath, alongside concerns regarding the influence of EU citizens in local elections. The speaker frames their viewpoints strongly based on core values, emphasizing the supremacy of the constitutional order and the will of the people.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position focuses heavily on adhering to the working procedures and constitutional principles of the Riigikogu, emphasizing the necessity of equal treatment for all members of Parliament. The speaker considers the amendment of the Riigikogu Elections Act a matter of constitutional significance, viewing it as one of the fundamental pillars of state governance. This stance is strongly procedural and value-based, requiring strict compliance with the Rules of Procedure.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, sharply criticizing the tax policy—which is described as a "strangling noose" for the Estonian people—and the distribution of taxpayer money abroad. A firm stand is also taken against the processing of the declaration concerning the Moscow Patriarchate, emphasizing the violation of constitutional rights and legal procedures. The viewpoints are strongly rooted in values and procedural adherence.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional toward the government’s actions, especially regarding tax hikes (the "tax axe") and the funding of foreign aid. Emphasis is placed on the strict adherence to good legislative practices, demanding that all draft legislation include a formal statement of intent (or drafting plan). These positions are value-based, focusing on prioritizing the interests of the Estonian taxpayer and residents in the national allocation of funds. Strong opposition exists both on substantive issues (such as raising fines) and regarding procedural violations.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on resistance to the government’s economic policy and the climate goals set by the European Union. Climate policy is viewed as fabricated propaganda pulled out of thin air and a massive business scheme that has resulted in the destruction of the Estonian economy and widespread corporate bankruptcies. Prime Minister Kaja Kallas’s actions are sarcastically characterized as the work of a "genius" in the complete destruction of the nation’s economy.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is extremely critical, focusing on adherence to the procedural norms of the Riigikogu and the Constitution. The speaker strongly opposes the draft election law, asserting that it violates Article 60 of the Constitution (uniformity and secrecy of elections). This stance is strongly value-based and aimed at institutional integrity, accusing the Presidium of continuously violating the law.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The political focus centers on the government's lack of transparency, particularly concerning the negotiations for the WHO pandemic treaty, and on social security issues stemming from the alleged crimes committed by allied forces in Võrumaa. The speaker adopts a fiercely confrontational stance, accusing the government of breaking its promises and concealing vital information. Their entire framework is heavily geared toward criticizing the government's activities and overall performance.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position focuses on strong support for the viability of rural areas and the preservation of libraries, which is presented as a guarantee for the survival of rural life. The speaker sharply criticizes the minister's assessment of the situation, arguing that the problem of library closures is actually serious and widespread. The stance is value-based, emphasizing the importance of community infrastructure.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position focuses heavily on the procedural correctness of the legislation and the stability of the voting requirements. The speaker emphasizes the majority of the Riigikogu (Parliament) composition required for the bill to move forward. Furthermore, they raise the question of the validity of this requirement in connection with a complaint being filed with the Supreme Court, seeking clarity regarding the subsequent steps. This represents a procedure-based approach aimed at achieving legal certainty.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position focuses on the legality of foreign policy and diplomatic activity. The speaker strongly opposes the interference of diplomats in the internal affairs of the host country, considering this a violation of the Estonian Foreign Service Act. The position is strongly oriented towards political and legal norms, demanding strict adherence to the law.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is centered on the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) election procedures and voting rules. The speaker voices skepticism and demands clarification on why the required majority for election (simple majority of votes cast versus an absolute majority of the composition) deviates from conventional practice. The position taken is procedurally cautious, stressing the necessity of adhering to established norms.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly focused on ensuring the principles of the rule of law and accountability, while criticizing the Prosecutor's Office for its inaction regarding legal violations. Furthermore, there is opposition to the disregard of the Riigikogu's procedural rules, demanding adherence to the constitution concerning voting requirements and holding government members accountable for making false statements. The focus is heavily directed towards evaluating the effectiveness and legality of the actions taken by the government and the justice system, as well as the organization of parliamentary work.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is on procedural correctness and ensuring legality within the work of the Riigikogu (Parliament), stressing that committee decisions must not contravene existing law. The speaker is strongly opposed to the committee's decision requiring a majority vote of the full Riigikogu membership to adopt the proposal to withdraw the motor vehicle tax bill. This position is firmly grounded in legal norms and the opinion provided by the Riigikogu Legal and Analysis Department. This implicitly supports abandoning the implementation of the car tax.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on broken promises regarding family benefits and emphasizing government accountability. It is stressed that the government’s actions (an avalanche of tax hikes) contradict the special care for large families outlined in Article 28 of the Constitution. The position is heavily value- and results-driven, criticizing the head of government for evading responsibility.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political action places strong emphasis on public health and consumer protection, centering specifically on the dangers posed by synthetic food additives (E-numbers), which have been dubbed "the monster." Lowering the VAT on cancer medications is also a crucial issue, with criticism directed at the actions of those individuals who abstained from the vote. The political framework is heavily oriented toward political accountability and guaranteeing health safety.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is one of strong, value-based opposition to the existence of the deep state and the abuse of power by security structures (especially the Prosecutor's Office). The speaker emphasizes the need to establish real control over the activities of the Prosecutor's Office, arguing that the current situation enables politically motivated persecution. He positions himself and other critics (e.g., Kalle Laanet) as victims slated for removal by the system.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The political emphasis is placed on the strict adherence to the working procedures of the Riigikogu and constitutional voting rules, highlighting the necessity of ensuring the parliament's operational capacity even in the absence of members. A second strong focus is on the modernization of national defense, particularly the development of drone manufacturing capabilities, which is regarded as a critical factor in modern warfare. The political framework is a blend of procedural correctness and strategic security.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The political stance heavily emphasizes procedural logic and transparency, particularly when presenting alternatives to security measures. The speaker is critical of vague assertions and logical errors within the draft legislation, specifically questioning the necessity of administering repeated official oaths. The criticism is directed against the government's conduct and political dishonesty, demanding concrete and well-justified solutions.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on the accountability and incompetence of the government, particularly the prime minister. The speaker delivers sharp criticism regarding the quality of state management, claiming that "something is rotten in the state of Estonia." Significant topics include the demographic situation and the political rationale behind climate change, for which concrete evidence is being demanded. The focus is heavily performance-driven, evaluating the government's actions and conduct.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position vigorously opposes the government's plan to accelerate renewable energy projects, stressing the negative impact this will have on society and the economy. The focus is directed toward the policy's effectiveness and the economic risks involved, demanding answers regarding the downsides of this rapid transition. The political confrontation is being intensified by personal attacks, which suggest the opposing side is dishonest and incompetent.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The most salient issue is the strict adherence to the Riigikogu’s Rules of Procedure and the proper conduct of the session. The speaker adopts a strongly confrontational stance regarding the chair’s decisions, accusing them of violating the rules and lacking objectivity. The focus is on the procedural and results-oriented framework, demanding the enforcement of rights.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The politician is strongly opposed to transitioning solely to renewable energy, emphasizing its unreliability and the inevitable winter deficit. He points to the situation on the Estonian islands as a cautionary tale of what the future would look like if the proposed bill were enacted. His position is pragmatic and results-oriented, centered on the system's real-world functionality.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is fiercely anti-government, centered on Prime Minister Kaja Kallas’s personal and political incompetence and the alleged destruction of Estonia. The primary focus is the economic crisis and the devastating impact on the ability of people living in poverty to cope and survive. This position is aggressively confrontational and accusatory, demanding the prime minister’s immediate resignation.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, accusing the coalition, acting under the direction of Kaja Kallas, of banning the passage of opposition bills and engaging in obstruction. The speaker emphasizes a value-based approach, focusing on media impartiality, the fight against propaganda, and highlighting the issue of the "deep state." He sharply criticizes the work of coalition members in the Riigikogu chamber, citing their low productivity.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance centers on the legal and ethical oversight of the government’s (or the minister’s) actions. The speaker strongly opposes activities that violate the requirements of the Advertising Act and directly accuses the minister of lying, thereby stressing the necessity of accountability and adherence to the law. This criticism is framed strongly around performance and ethics.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is currently on the draft bill aimed at reducing CO2 emissions in the transport sector, a proposal toward which the speaker expresses strong skepticism and opposition. He/She calls into question the scientific foundation of the climate targets, specifically asking what the percentage and normal level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are. The speaker frames their stance as a criticism of the government's lack of knowledge and competence.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus centers on strong opposition to the privatization of state-owned companies (Elektrilevi and Enefit Green), a move that is part of the government's coalition agreement. This stance is strongly value-based and emphasizes public interest, arguing that strategic considerations and security must take precedence over profit when dealing with state-owned enterprises. The speaker prioritizes the interests of the Estonian people and consumers, contrasting them with the goal of maximizing shareholder profit.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The political focus is on restoring the principles of the rule of law and establishing effective oversight over the activities of the Prosecutor's Office. He strongly opposes the current system, which he views as characterized by impunity and the abuse of power, stressing the necessity of protecting citizens from the arbitrary actions of the state prosecutor. He frames his stance in terms of core values, citing the unethical and unprofessional conduct of the Prosecutor's Office, which he argues jeopardizes citizens' health and rights.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's financial decisions concerning tax hikes. The speaker stresses the government's lack of trustworthiness, citing both pre-election promises ("Read my lips, taxes will not rise") and their current actions. The framework of this position is heavily results-oriented and centers on political accountability to the taxpayer.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is a prominent opposition politician who sharply criticizes Kaja Kallas’s government for politically blocking opposition bills, including amendments to the Emergency Situation Act, calling this a reckless disregard for the nation’s future and resources. The primary focus is on public health and the environment, evidenced by the introduction of a bill to ban nano-additives in aviation fuel, which is framed as an issue of public interest and conscience. He employs a populist and skeptical framework, drawing parallels between this criticism and his previous stances on COVID-19 vaccines.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker's political focus is on reducing the tax burden, supporting the lowering of excise duties to improve the residents' livelihood. He takes a strong, value-based stance in defense of constitutional equality and the right to peaceful protest. His political position is critical of the government and the Riigikogu leadership, accusing them of selectively applying norms and violating procedural rules.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus centers on Prime Minister Kaja Kallas’s personal trustworthiness and her husband’s business dealings in Russia following the start of the war. The speaker delivers strong criticism and demands an explanation as to how Russian security agencies failed to intervene in the transport services, especially considering the Prime Minister's staunch anti-Putin position. The entire line of questioning is strongly value-based and targets the ethical nature of the head of government's actions.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on banning COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in Estonia, due to the lack of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies and the suspicion of widespread health damage. This position is strongly antagonistic to the current healthcare policy, grounded in the protection of public health and the right to bodily self-determination. The crisis has revealed an abuse of public interests, necessitating the restoration of accountability and critical thinking.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly anti-government (specifically, against Kaja Kallas’s government), centered on the defense of private property and fundamental freedoms. The most salient issues are the mandatory building renovation requirement and the introduction of a car tax, both of which are treated as actions hostile to the free market and democracy. This political platform is framed around core values, drawing historical parallels with forced collectivization and the Stalinist regime. The views expressed are intensely confrontational and apocalyptic, interpreting the government’s actions as the liquidation of private property.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on resisting the government's tax increases, which are viewed as hostile to both business and the general public. A second key issue is the defense of constitutional rights (specifically, the secrecy of communications and the inviolability of private life), particularly concerning the inspection of postal deliveries. These positions are strongly value-driven and critical of current policy, underscoring the necessity of implementing a tax policy that stimulates economic growth.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus is directed toward ensuring the accountability and operational transparency of the legal system, especially the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker criticizes the Prosecutor's Office for its inability to initiate criminal proceedings against a prosecutor who, according to a Supreme Court decision, had fabricated evidence. This position is strongly procedural and rooted in the principles of the rule of law, demanding the application of sanctions for filing illegal charges.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position is strongly oppositional toward Kaja Kallas’s government, focusing on the administration’s incompetence and lack of integrity. Key issues include the critical underestimation of Estonia’s defense capability and the exposure of the hidden agendas behind the Rail Baltic project. The criticism is sharp and is presented under the banner of protecting national security and the interests of the people.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on defending the rights of the parliament and criticizing the coalition's "us-versus-them bill methodology." The main themes relate to the freedom of legislative initiative and prioritizing the resolution of issues affecting citizens. The speaker defends the right of Members of Parliament to initiate legislation, even if the relevant work is already underway within the ministry. The overall position is heavily procedural and normative.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the European Union's excessive influence over national tax policy, particularly regarding VAT rates, stressing the necessity of retaining independent decision-making authority. Intense criticism is also directed at the organization of work within the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) and the disregard for internal rules during the rapid processing of draft legislation. The focus is thus placed equally on political sovereignty and the integrity of parliamentary work procedures.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the rigid fiscal policy of the Kaja Kallas government and its criticism of the ongoing strikes, emphasizing that the administration is fixated solely on figures while ignoring the dire economic situation faced by teachers. The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on the inefficiency of the government's actions and its blatant disregard for public dissatisfaction. The core focus of the issue is the evaluation of the government's operational effectiveness.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political focus is currently on international events, highlighting the protests by German farmers against the green transition. The speaker utilizes these events to question the significance of the green transition or the manner in which it is being implemented, pointing to strong public opposition. This stance is value-driven and centers on the consequences of the policy.