By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is directed at the minister and the government's policy, which is considered flawed and undemocratic. The criticism targets both the structure of the electoral college (which favors the coalition) and the data underpinning the energy sector decisions (outdated studies). The speaker issued a direct challenge to the minister, asking him to refute the WHO conclusions if he refuses to acknowledge them.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the ministries maintaining the drug monopoly and the proponents of the draft bill, especially Andre Hanimäe. The criticism is intense, focusing on political corruption and the disregard for the constitution. The speaker asks the minister directly whether he is prepared to finally break up the monopoly, and casts doubt on the legal expertise of the opponent (Hanimäe).
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the chair of the session (for failing to apply procedural rules) and the government, particularly Minister Joller (for incompetence and presenting false data). The criticism is sharp and focuses both on procedural violations and political injustice concerning budget priorities. The speaker demands accountability and justification, ruling out any compromise regarding false data or unfair decisions.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is sharply criticized both for his policies (the car tax) and his personal background (a former communist). The intensity of the criticism is high, accusing the opposing side of working against the Estonian people, the highest authority, and of violating property rights.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the coalition, the Social Democrats ("Socs"), and a specific colleague, Andre Hanimägi, whom he calls a proponent of a digital concentration camp. The criticism is intense and ranges from political opposition (Rail Baltic, the surveillance system) to accusations of engaging in illegal surveillance activities. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, the demands are for the termination of illegal activities and withdrawal from the agreements.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
Direct criticism is aimed at the Reform Party for blocking the scheduling of the motor vehicle tax bill, and at the Riigikogu Board for the inefficient use of working time. Politically, there is opposition to EU regulations that create monopolies and serve the interests of large manufacturers. The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-based.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary targets are the Reform Party and the government led by Kaja Kallas, who stand accused of imposing new taxes and manipulating approval ratings. Particularly harsh criticism is aimed at President Alar Karis and the Riigikogu's "warmongers," who are charged with ignorantly destroying the state by advocating for the use of long-range weaponry. The resistance is intense and uncompromising, culminating in calls for the government's immediate removal.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Strong opposition is directed at the government and the coalition, who stand accused of implementing unconstitutional activities and demonstrating a lack of professional expertise within the committees. The Social Democrats (Riina Sikkut) face particular criticism for supporting a surveillance society, while government officials are criticized for inciting crimes against the state. The criticism spans policy, procedural matters, and the personal level (specifically, a lack of competence).
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Criticism is directed at various government agencies that violated personal data processing rules and failed to inform citizens. The backlash is intense because critics are focusing on the lack of sanctions and the cessation of surveillance without any legal accountability. The criticism targets both procedural and legal failures.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary opponent is the minister, who stands accused of concealing the truth and rigidly adhering to a narrative dating back to the start of the pandemic. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political accusations (regarding vaccine safety) and personal attacks (specifically, refusing to participate in debates and attend the conference). The speaker demands a direct confrontation and accountability from the adversary.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is aimed at the procedure and those who were missing, citing low attendance during the session. This is a procedural rather than a political attack, which calls into question the fulfillment of work obligations by members of parliament.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The confrontation is directed against the actions of the government and the responsible ministries (the Ministry of Defense), criticizing their ability to guarantee national security and identify threats. The criticism is sharp and focuses on deficiencies in the country's defense capabilities, suggesting that the government is unaware of the seriousness of the threat.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary adversaries are the Riigikogu Board (Lauri Hussar, Toomas Kivimägi) and government ministers (Kristen Michal, Margus Tsahkna). The criticism is intense, targeting both specific political decisions (the car tax) and procedural violations (the overemphasis on the committees' right to self-organization). He publicly accuses ministers and officials of lying and engaging in anti-state activity, while simultaneously rejecting the "exceptions" proposed by the Board.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong criticism has been leveled against the actions of the Riigikogu and the government, citing " serious failures" and the repeated adoption of unconstitutional laws. The criticism targets both the substance of the law (its unconstitutionality) and the procedure used for its adoption via fast-track proceedings. The speaker demands the immediate halting of the process, not a compromise.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the supporters of the RAB draft bill, directly criticizing Urmas Reinsalu for denying totalitarian threats and Maris Lauri for downplaying the bill's effects. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the opposing side of permitting illegal surveillance and constitutional breaches.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opposition is directed at the minister's positions and the solutions proposed by the government, which are deemed insufficient for protecting citizens' rights. The criticism is policy-based, challenging the minister's assumptions regarding the behavior and autonomy of local municipalities. The speaker also criticizes the system that allows local governments to quibble over small sums, thereby leaving families unprotected.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed directly at the government, coalition MPs, and the Minister of Finance, all of whom are accused of either malice or sheer incompetence toward the Estonian people. The criticism is intense, focusing on both political violations (tax hikes) and procedural breaches (unconstitutional lawmaking). The speaker asserts that the government’s actions could lead to a revolution, thereby ruling out any compromise regarding the current policies.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at the coalition, which is accused of ramming legislation through, or employing "steamroller tactics." The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and constitutional violations, citing interventions by the Chancellor of Justice and the President.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal, whose answers are considered incomprehensible and "obfuscation," and at the law enforcement agencies (PPA, the Prosecutor's Office). The criticism is intense and is primarily based on accusations of legal violations, specifically accusing them of illegally carrying out state supervision. Compromise is ruled out until the individuals who acted illegally are held accountable ("a wolf does not prey on a wolf").
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is primarily directed at ministry officials, who are criticized for their lack of knowledge, bureaucratic inertia, and unwillingness to act independently. He/She also criticizes the presumed actions of the Reform Party in rejecting the bill, as well as military leaders for their outdated mindset. The criticism is mainly focused on policy and procedure, but it also includes doubts regarding the motives of the opponents (ERJK).
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary standoff is with the minister, who is accused of providing misinformation regarding the number of complaints and denying the seriousness of the problem. The criticism is intense and centers on the government's failure to recognize and address a serious issue of violating language requirements, even referencing instances of ridicule.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the presenter, who is accused of inaccuracy or an overly effusive emphasis on positivity. The criticism is intense and focuses on the lack of transparency, demanding concrete evidence, such as a business registry code, to rule out falsehoods.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at ministry officials (Aive Telling) and the former minister (Riina Sikkut). They are accused of lacking knowledge regarding the harmful effects of the wind turbines and failing to possess the necessary equipment and accreditations required for effective state control. The opposition is procedural and political, underscoring a significant regulatory failure.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party government and coalition, which is accused of selling off Estonia's resources, violating the constitution, and acting as Brussels' lackey. The criticism is intense and accusatory, charging the government with a policy of driving the people out (or "impoverishing the populace") and labeling their actions as "brutality." Compromise is ruled out because the government "rides roughshod over" the opposition "all the time."
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed against the bill's flawed wording and the introduction of discretionary power, criticizing it as a potential avenue for the unequal treatment of individuals. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, warning that when the law is implemented, individuals might be favored or burdened based on their perceived undesirability.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponents are the Government of the Republic and the market player Bolt, who are accused of aggressive lobbying and seeking a monopoly in order to drive traditional taxis out of the market. The government's position is described as "substanceless" and "something pulled out of thin air," suggesting that laws are being created solely to serve specific interest groups.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition's stance is intense and directed squarely at the coalition members and the Riigikogu Presidium. The criticism is both procedural (concerning the disregard for sound legislative practice) and political (concerning the ignoring of the will of the people and the mere execution of orders). The speaker rejects compromise, demanding the dissolution of the Riigikogu and new elections.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition’s stance is intense and aimed squarely at the coalition (the Reform Party, Eesti 200). They are criticizing the constitutionality of the coalition's proposed legislation and the poor attendance record of their MPs. Criticism is also being leveled at the competence of government experts and officials, particularly concerning their knowledge of infrasound. Furthermore, they are demanding individual accountability. The speaker stresses that the opposition was absolutely correct regarding the motor vehicle tax.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the legislator, who failed to follow the principles of good law-making during the drafting of the act by neglecting to analyze the impacts. The criticism is severe and focuses on procedural deficiencies, rejecting the argument of urgency. The goal is to take the dispute to the Supreme Court, which suggests a complete lack of readiness to compromise.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The confrontation is directed at government ministers (three mentioned) whose integrity is being called into question. The criticism is procedural and ethical, emphasizing that the immunity afforded to Riigikogu members does not extend to ministers, and thus they must be held accountable for potential false statements.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the proponent of the draft bill and the content of the bill itself, which is considered a threat to Estonian sovereignty because it obligates Estonia to comply with Council decisions. The criticism is intense and includes accusations that the bill restores the Soviet Union-era decision-making model, thereby ruling out any compromise regarding the question of independence.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The position opposes the government's policy, criticizing the funding of wind energy at the expense of national defense under the pretext of lacking financial resources. The critique targets the improper allocation of resources and the favoring of foreign companies over national security.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Reform Party and Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur, who are sharply criticized for neglecting reservists and for the work left undone over the past eight years. The criticism is aimed at political negligence and the incorrect setting of priorities, while also accusing the Ministry of Finance of providing an "arrogant" response. The speaker considers the government's actions to be "vile and brazen behavior."
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The opposition is targeting the government and its representatives, criticizing them both for their policies (specifically, migration that is destroying Estonia) and for procedural violations (such as ignoring the rules of legislative drafting). The attacks are intense and include personal accusations (e.g., the rapporteur being tight-lipped and the minister exceeding their authority). The speaker urges the audience not to support the draft bill, ruling out any possibility of compromise.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are Irja Lutsar and Tanel Kiik, who represent the government and the medical mainstream, and from whom answers regarding vaccine safety are demanded. The criticism is intense and ranges from political failure to accusations of involvement in a human depopulation project.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Constitutional Committee, which is being accused of engaging in political games and neglecting its role as the upholder of constitutional values. Government members are also facing criticism for failing to fulfill their obligation to report to the Riigikogu and respond to members' demands. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and institutional violations.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversaries are the presiding officer (for disregarding procedural rules) and the cabinet minister (for ignoring health matters, negligence, and deceit). The criticism is intense, directly accusing the minister of dishonesty and disregard for public health. The standoff is both procedural and personal, with a total unwillingness to compromise.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the minister and government representatives, who are criticized for failing to provide answers, avoiding uncomfortable topics, and searching for a "lifeline." Criticism is also leveled against the science policy that was in effect during COVID-19 and the alleged prohibition of alternative analyses. The criticism is both political and procedural, demanding that the minister be held accountable.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the bill's rapporteur (Mr. Terras) and the bill's proponents, who are criticized for failing to provide a substantive answer and for unparliamentary behavior. The criticism is intense and personal, accusing the rapporteur of wasting time and "playing dumb," and labeling his excuses as "pathetic." He also criticizes the Reform Party's earlier stances regarding visa freedom.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is being sharply criticized for unconstitutional activity and the "policy of closing churches." The criticism is intense, including both procedural accusations (disregard for the constitution) and personal attacks (comparisons to totalitarian figures).
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponent is the government, particularly Climate Minister Yoko Alender, whose actions are being labeled unlawful and shameless due to her disregard for the law. The criticism is intense and focuses on political negligence and the failure to provide answers. The mainstream media is also being criticized for aligning itself with the government and labeling concerned citizens as "participants in a traveling circus."
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of opposition are the Prime Minister and the Government of the Republic, who face criticism regarding both policy (the detrimental effects of wind farms) and personal conduct (dictatorial tendencies, spreading misinformation). Criticism is also leveled at the chairman of the Riigikogu session for arbitrarily bending procedural rules. The intensity of these attacks is extremely high, demanding the Prime Minister's resignation and ruling out any possibility of negotiations.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed against Foreign Minister Tsahkna, criticizing his personal conduct and the use of language inappropriate for a diplomat when labeling a member of the Riigikogu (Parliament) with the term ("recidivism"). The criticism is both personal and procedural, focusing on the minister's accountability and the use of improper expressions. The controversy is intense, and the possibility of initiating legal action against the minister is being explored.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the governing coalition’s MPs and officials, whose unlimited expansion of power is under criticism. The coalition is accused of deliberately disregarding established norms and acting in bad faith, in order to fulfill promises made in the coalition agreement that violate the constitution. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of ignoring fundamental legal principles.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the executive branch (the minister, the police, and the Language Inspectorate) for the inconsistent enforcement of the law. There is also criticism directed at migration policies and non-Estonian speakers who demand the use of Russian in public places, which is viewed as a "very bad sign."
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponents are "scientists who make up the scientific consensus." The criticism is intensely personal and psychological, calling into question the opponents' mental health and sanity. Compromise is ruled out by completely discrediting the opponents.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The opposition is directed at the implementation of the government's tax policy, which is considered an intolerable injustice, and at the activities of the Tax and Customs Board. The speaker criticizes specific colleagues (e.g., Andre Hanimägi) and political parties (EKRE, Eesti 200) ironically or bluntly for the weakness of their arguments. In the foreign policy debate, he attacks the submitters of the draft bill, accusing them of a forceful assault without specific legal evidence.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The primary opposition is directed against the inaction of the Health Board and the minister, accusing them of spreading misinformation and failing to identify the sources of danger. Specific criticism is leveled against Mari-Anne Härma, the Deputy Director General of the Health Board, for disseminating obvious false information that contradicts the laws of physics. The criticism is intense and addresses both the competence of the officials and the political negligence of the government.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is intense and aimed at casting doubt on the motives of the opposing party, indirectly accusing them of resisting improvements in public health. The criticism is not centered on policy or procedure; instead, it attacks the opponent's will and objectives ("why don't you want the health of the Estonian people to be better").
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main opponent is Lauri Hussar, the Speaker of the Riigikogu, who is being intensely criticized for procedural unfairness and brazen conduct. The speaker also points to bias, believing that the chairman does not want him to ask questions to Michal.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary groups facing criticism are the ministers of the Government of the Republic, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Prosecutor’s Office, all of whom are accused of enjoying opacity. The criticism is procedural and intense, pointing to an imbalance in oversight and the lack of justification for secrecy when no abuse has occurred. The speaker expresses confusion and demands clarification, essentially citing double standards.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism targets the actions of the Health Board and the government. This is because, despite a lack of knowledge regarding the potential harm caused by wind turbines, planning processes are still moving forward. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting the knowledge deficits of the responsible agencies.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being intensely criticized, and association with which is considered abnormal by the speaker. The criticism is directed at systemic injustice and the distribution of resources, positioning EKRE and other marginalized groups ("those left outside") as victims of unfair treatment.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Climate and the Health Board for their lack of knowledge and inaction, which allows construction work to continue. Opposition is also directed at a specific presenter, who is being pressed for fact-based answers and is accused of giving vague replies and invoking the use of "common sense." The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failure.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opposition is aimed at the current rules of procedure, which permit the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK) to adopt decisions, and at the coalition MPs who defend this delegation of authority. The criticism is intense and strictly procedural, challenging the Riigikogu's right to delegate such powers. The rapporteur is also considered an opponent, as they refuse to assess the constitutionality of the draft bill.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary targets are the government and "the ruling clique," who stand accused of running the economy into the ground and disregarding public health risks. Specific individuals under fire include spokesperson Annely Akkermann (for denying the economic reality) and her colleague Karmen Joller (for lying about infrasound). The attacks are intense, featuring accusations of being struck blind, suppressing questions, and the actions of "quack doctors in white coats."
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The opposition is primarily aimed at the practical feasibility of adopting a new international legal instrument (the optional protocol) and its subsequent implementation in Estonia. The criticism itself is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the dangers stemming from parental manipulation and the overall complexity of the legislation.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the ruling government coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of destroying Estonia through tax hikes and healthcare issues. The criticism is intense, ranging from political accusations (maintaining the current wartime course) to criminal framing (such as comparisons to the mafia). Specifically, Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna and Prime Minister Kristen Michal are being criticized.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, particularly the Ministry of Climate, for allowing wind turbines to be constructed before clear safety standards regarding infrasound have been established. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of endangering public health and acting in reverse (building first, ensuring safety later). The minister is also criticized for evading the question.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are coalition MPs, commission members (including doctors), and ministry representatives, who are accused of deliberate lying and favoring pedophiles. The criticism is intense and personal, calling into question the opponents' morality and conscience. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they are demanding the rejection of the draft bill.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversaries are the proponents of the draft legislation and the chairman of the Constitutional Committee. The criticism leveled is largely procedural (violations of sound legislative practice, undue haste) and intellectual, accusing the opposing party of incompetence and a lack of understanding of key legal principles (e.g., *ultima ratio*). There is no readiness for compromise, given the insistence on strict adherence to procedural rules.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the current Riigikogu Rules of Procedure, which restrict the speaking rights of non-affiliated members during the third reading. This constitutes a procedural objection highlighting the system's unfairness, rather than a personal attack.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are key government figures (Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, Prime Minister Kristen Michal) and the police leadership, who are accused of establishing a political police force and grossly violating established norms. Criticism is also aimed at Riigikogu member Andre Hanimägi, who is accused of legal illiteracy and trampling on the memory of national heroes. The attacks are intense, accusing the opponents of being anti-nationalist.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The main confrontation is directed against the ruling coalition, which is accused of violating the law, pursuing a state-destroying financial policy, and ignoring the opposition. The criticism is intense and accusatory, claiming that the government is sneering at the opposition and awaiting the suppression of demonstrations. Compromise has been ruled out because parliamentary means have been declared exhausted.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is held accountable for the consequences of the critical infrastructure failure and for compensating the resulting damage. The critique is rooted in policy and performance, stressing the government's duty to ensure that citizens are compensated for losses incurred.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is targeting the government, the Ministry of Climate, and the bill’s rapporteur (Igor Taro), accusing them of dishonesty and concealing the real information. The speaker also sharply criticizes the European Union/Brussels ("by the other union"), viewing them as an external force intent on seizing Estonia’s natural resources. The criticism is both political and procedural, specifically accusing the bill of being hidden within an "omnibus package."
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are coalition MPs and medical scientists (e.g., Professor Irja Lutsar), who are being criticized for failing to grasp the content of the draft bill and for setting the wrong priorities. The criticism is intense and addresses both procedural issues (like not reading the bill) and moral aspects, directly challenging their competence.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed both at the government and at specific political parties and individuals. He/She sharply criticizes the low approval rating of Eesti 200 and the procedural incompetence of Reform Party members (e.g., Toomas Kivimägi) during the vote. The criticism is both politically substantive (regarding VAT) and personal and procedural (referring to navigating the chamber).
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main adversaries are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, both part of the ruling coalition, who are intensely criticized for breaking election promises and engaging in political deception. The critique is both personal and procedural, further accusing the government of non-transparent management of state finances and a complete lack of oversight.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main adversaries are the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK) and the Government of the Republic, who are criticized for violating the constitutional order and usurping the parliament's decision-making power. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural deficiencies, directly questioning whether the parliament has become bicameral.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the Minister of the Interior (on procedural and legal grounds) and Jürgen Ligi, the Reform Party minister. The attacks directed against Ligi are intensely personal, accusing him of lying and having a personality disorder. The government's economic policy is sharply criticized, with references made to its failure and the resulting protests.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main adversary is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is criticized both on a personal level (narcissistic personality disorder) and for ethical violations (conflict of interest). The opposition is also aimed at the government's legal policy, which is tightening fine rates despite no visible increase in violations. The criticism is intense and includes personal accusations.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed against the existing legal provision, which is deemed unconstitutional due to the infringement of property rights. The opposition is intense and is based purely on legal and fundamental grounds, arguing that a subordinate statute must not restrict rights guaranteed by the constitution.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the government and specific ministers who are accused of obfuscation, evasion, and incompetence regarding the issue. The criticism is political (concerning the costly bill) as well as procedural (the Riigikogu's lack of awareness) and personal. Widespread dissatisfaction is highlighted, encompassing cultural workers, teachers, the Estonian Railways trade union, and the Estonian Employers' Confederation.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main adversary is the government, which is being intensely criticized for its economy-damaging policies and budget cuts. The criticism is policy-based, but also includes accusations that the government is preparing to use force against the strikers. The confrontation is high-intensity, and the possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition’s stance is highly intense and directed primarily at Jürgen Ligi and the Reform Party. The criticism is both political (raising the tax burden) and personal/ethical, accusing the opponent of violating the spirit of the oath of office and inconsistency. The attacks are direct and uncompromisingly aggressive.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main adversaries are government ministers, who are accused of violating the constitution and engaging in unethical activities, as well as the Riigikogu Board, which allowed a corruption-tinged draft bill to proceed. The criticism is intense and encompasses both political (the case of Keit Kasemets) and procedural accusations (the retaliatory action against Taimar Peterkop). There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, demands are being made for accountability and resignation.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed squarely at the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party, accusing them of deliberate lying and deceiving the public (tax hikes, broken election promises). The criticism is intense, escalating from mere political failure to being branded "anti-state activity." He/She claims that the coalition is merely a "lackey carrying out orders given from elsewhere" and is doing this solely to hold onto power.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main opposition is aimed squarely at the policies of the minister and the government, criticizing both the objectives of Rail Baltic and the decisions regarding traffic management. The criticism is intense and highly political, suggesting that the minister is either inadequately informed or fully aware of the projects' true objectives, which are detrimental to national interests.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government, which stands accused of corruption and turning the country into a periphery via the proposed energy bill. Criticism is also aimed at foreign business sharks who exploit Estonia's natural resources, essentially getting free wind energy. There is no willingness to compromise; the attacks are intense and accuse government structures of systematic dismantling.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed against the Riigikogu Presidium, whose democratic suitability is being called into question using personal and intense criticism (the 'authoritarian regime chatbot'). Furthermore, the actions of the government or the Riigikogu are sharply criticized regarding the ratification of an international treaty that conflicts with the constitution.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary confrontation is directed against the actions of the minister and the government, sharply criticizing procedural discrepancies in the handling of the Lihula monument case and the political failure to control foreign capital. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and procedural impropriety, accusing the opposing side of spreading falsehoods.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main target is the Minister of Defense, whose public communication and credibility are being attacked. The criticism is directed at the sources underlying the political statements, demanding specific evidence and excluding the use of general information.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The main opposition is directed against the actions taken by the Minister of the Interior and the government regarding the Lihula monument issue. The criticism is intense and focuses on the legal basis of the political decisions, accusing the government of ignoring valid expert assessments and carrying out confiscation without a legal foundation. Furthermore, the presiding officer of the session is criticized concerning the adherence to procedural rules.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is being leveled against the actions of the government (or the responsible minister) for deciding to terminate farmer subsidies. The opposition is intense and politically motivated, given that this budgetary decision jeopardizes food security and will cause businesses to cease operations.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The main confrontation is with the presiding officer of the session (Mr. Hussar), whose actions are deemed unlawful and contrary to the constitution. The criticism is intense and procedural, seeking avenues for applying penal sanctions against the presiding officer. There is no talk of compromise; instead, the emphasis is placed on legal oversight.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the governing coalition and the leadership of the Riigikogu (Lauri Hussar and his team), who are accused of blocking draft legislation and undermining the rights of the parliamentary plenary session. Criticism is also directed at the former heads of the European Union Affairs Committee (Siim Kallas) and the Minister of Social Affairs (Signe Riisalo). The attacks are intense, ranging from procedural violations to accusations of corruption and personal profiteering.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The criticism is aimed squarely at the actions of Kaja Kallas's government, where the "crucial circumstances" that arose during its tenure prompted the submission of a bill designed to increase ministerial accountability. The conflict is both ethical and procedural, underscoring the necessity of punishing ministers for lying in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament).
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition is aimed at the Reform Party government and coalition, who are accused of incompetence in managing the state's finances and employing tactics reminiscent of Stalinist forced collectivization. The criticism is intense, ranging from accusations of political incompetence to moral condemnation, with supporters of the tax being labeled as representatives of "evil." They are demanding the bill be completely scrapped, ruling out any possibility of compromise.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The main opponent is the current government, which is accused of violating the constitution and failing to reach an agreement with local municipalities. The criticism is intense, ranging from political opposition to accusations of implementing a Stalinist policy of destruction that is taxing people to death.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary opponents are the supporters of the nuclear energy bill, who are accused of ignoring the risks and serving the interests of foreign corporations. Criticism is also aimed at the Riigikogu Board over procedural errors (misreading of voting results) and at the Supreme Court for the improper handling of e-voting complaints. It also calls into question the rapporteur's knowledge regarding the dangers of the issue.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
He/She strongly opposes the submitters of the statement and their supporters, criticizing them for interference and escalating the situation. The criticism is intense and includes extremely blunt personal rejection, which completely rules out any compromise.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), which is accused of draining the Estonian people and executing the mandates of globalists. The criticism is both ideological and procedural (specifically, the committee's malpractice in merging amendments), and the speaker explicitly rules out supporting the candidates of the ruling parties in the elections.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The standoff is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, criticizing her absence from the parliament's information session. The criticism is procedural and demands an explanation regarding the attendance of the head of government.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Fierce opposition is currently targeting the Reform Party, which faces criticism both for the government's failures (specifically IT systems) and for allegedly violating the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense, featuring direct comparisons to authoritarian leaders, and the Reform Party's sincerity regarding the minister retaining their position is also being questioned. Criticism is also directed at the IT minister for the system's failure.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the uncontrolled activity of the media, which violates the presumption of innocence with unfounded factual claims, and against the incompetence of the Finance Committee. Criticism is also aimed at the Ministry of Justice's position, which considers civil law remedies sufficient. Former President Kersti Kaljulaid is criticized for her demonstrative behavior and lack of apology regarding the Marti Kuusik case.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the previous practice of the electoral commission, which is considered procedurally flawed and non-transparent because the minutes failed to record the statements of the parties involved. The objection is institutional and centers on the violation of procedural norms.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opponents are the coalition MPs from the Reform Party, who stand accused of defending e-voting solely to ensure their perpetual hold on power. Criticism has also been leveled against Arne Koitmäe, the head of the Electoral Service, who failed to provide answers to crucial technical questions concerning how the secrecy of e-voting is guaranteed.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Strong opposition is directed at the Riigikogu Board and the committee chairman (Eduard Odinets), who are directly accused of unlawful activity concerning the bundling of amendments. The criticism is primarily procedural and legal, accusing the opposing party of exceeding their authority and disregarding current legislation.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The objection is aimed at the actions of the presiding officer, criticizing the excessively fast pace and the potential restriction of the right to speak. Furthermore, colleague Jaak Aab was criticized for violating a specific article of the rules of procedure during the vote. The criticism is strictly procedural.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are Minister Riina Sikkut and the Social Democrats, who are accused of violating the law and squandering taxpayer money. The chairman of the session, Lauri Hussar, is also being criticized for unfair handling of proceedings and ignoring procedural opportunities, with critics accusing him of being "obtuse."
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic and the ministers, especially concerning the violation of good legislative practice rules and the introduction of new taxes. The criticism is both policy-based (prioritizing foreign aid) and procedure-based (lack of a formal drafting intent). The new minister is reproached for failing to take responsibility for previous mistakes, with demands that they "go full throttle."
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government implementing the European Union’s climate policy. The criticism is intense and personal (accusing Kallas of destroying the economy) as well as political (claiming climate policy is just a business plan). There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, they demand that Estonia’s interests be defended in Brussels and that the prime minister resign.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main adversaries are the Riigikogu Board and the bill’s presenter (Riho Terras), who are accused of violating the law and adopting illegal decisions. The criticism is predominantly procedural and legal, demanding that the Board respond to the unlawful process. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, emphasizing that the government’s credibility is near zero.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary opponents are the government and specific ministers (the Minister of Social Affairs, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Margus Tsahkna), who are criticized both for political accusations (the Kremlin narrative) and procedural violations (a lack of transparency). The confrontation is intensely confrontational, demanding that the minister be called to order and rejecting the government's explanations.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The backlash is aimed at the minister, who is being criticized for his inaccurate assessment of the situation concerning rural libraries. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, claiming that the minister is painting a rosier picture of reality, which justifies strong criticism.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no criticism; rather, the focus is on the potential conflict between the Parliament's decision and the outcome of the appeal submitted to the Supreme Court. The confrontation is procedural and legal in nature, rather than personal or political.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the diplomat’s actions, which are considered a violation of the law (specifically, Section 74 of the Foreign Service Act) due to interference in the internal affairs of the host country. The confrontation is procedural and legal in nature, focusing on the breach of established norms rather than constituting a personal attack.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The objection is directed at the interpretation of the election procedure presented or applied by the presiding officer of the session, asking why things are being done differently now. The criticism is purely procedural and focuses on the inconsistency of the rules.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main adversaries are members of the government, who are accused of directly lying to Parliament, and the Prosecutor's Office, whose inaction regarding illegal surveillance activities is being criticized. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and ethical violations, demanding accountability.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the decision made by the Riigikogu committee, which demands an absolute majority vote (a majority of the full membership) for the adoption of the bill, and at those defending this stance (Lauri Hussar was named). The criticism is intense and focuses purely on procedural irregularity, accusing the opposing party of acting in contravention of the law.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government ministers. The criticism is intense, accusing Kaja Kallas of avoiding responsibility and citing the ministers’ incompetence (specifically, their lack of information regarding Macron’s plan). The opposition is active on both the policy level (family benefits, taxes) and the procedural level (the ministers’ apparent ignorance).
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction regarding the regulation of E-substances, demanding concrete steps from the minister. Strong procedural and moral opposition is also being expressed toward those members of the Riigikogu who were absent from the vote on lowering the VAT for cancer medications, with their absence being interpreted as a substantive 'no' vote.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the security structures (the Prosecutor's Office, Kapo, the Central Criminal Police), who are referred to as "the fist of the deep state," and the press (Eesti Ekspress), which is accused of acting as a tool for the Prosecutor's Office. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of political persecution, influencing witnesses, and violating the law (e.g., controlling declarations of interest). He warns colleagues against criticizing the security structures.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The criticism targets the leadership of the Riigikogu and the coalition's actions, citing technical malfunctions (a faulty division bell/call system) and the poor attendance of coalition members during the session. Furthermore, he/she challenges the procedural interpretations regarding voting rules put forth by the rapporteur.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the presiding officer of the session, who is being pressed for specific answers regarding alternatives to the security measures. The criticism is both procedural and political, citing logical flaws in the draft bill and warning against evasion. Kaja Kallas is being utilized as a negative rhetorical reference point, symbolizing dishonesty and ambiguity.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is criticized both for her conduct (arrogance, refusal to answer) and for her incompetence. The criticism is intense and personal, calling into question the Prime Minister's knowledge of the topics she discusses. The absence of a response is interpreted as a lack of knowledge and an underestimation of parliament ("nerds").
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main clash is aimed at the government representative (Kristen Michal), who is accused of dodging questions and simply repeating the Prime Minister’s (Kaja Kallas) talking points. The criticism is intense and includes both political attacks (such as ignoring economic impacts) and personal attacks, including the introduction of the vaccination issue.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponent is the session chairman, who is being criticized for procedural violations and subjectivity. The criticism is aimed at the chairman's conduct during the information session, particularly concerning the evaluation of whether the answer provided to Varro Vooglaid's question was sufficient. The intensity of the attack is high, casting doubt on the chairman's objectivity.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the bill's presenter (Mario) and the proposed legislation he represents. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on the bill's inability to offer solutions for winter energy production and the vagueness of the answers provided. He criticizes the presenter for failing to give "a satisfactory response."
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who faces criticism both personally (plagiarism, arrogance, lack of education) and politically (the destruction of Estonia, economic warfare). The criticism is intense and demands the head of government step down. Lauri Hussar, the presiding officer of the session, is also criticized for disregarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is aimed at the coalition and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who stand accused of obstructing the opposition's legislative work and abusing the rights of the Riigikogu. Strong criticism is also leveled against the Estonian Public Broadcasting (ERR), accusing them of political imbalance, serving the "deep state," and journalistic prejudgment of guilt before a court ruling.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed against the minister, who is accused of violating the law and outright lying when answering a question. The criticism is intense, focusing on both ethics and the breach of law (the Advertising Act). Compromise is ruled out, as accountability for the lie is demanded.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is Minister Mart Võrklaev, who is facing intense personal criticism. The criticism focuses on his alleged dishonesty and lack of knowledge concerning climate targets, which calls into question his competence in managing the draft legislation. The speaker's goal is to completely undermine the opponent's credibility.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev and the Reform Party-led government, criticizing their privatization plan. The criticism is intense, focusing on how detrimental the policy is to the Estonian people, and accusing the minister of dodging the issue.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main confrontation is directed against the institution of the Prosecutor's Office, which is accused of systematic abuse of power, impunity, and internal protection. He criticizes the Ministry of Justice for its lack of oversight and points to the political utilization of the Prosecutor's Office (Porto Franco, Marti Kuusik), which led to the collapse of the government. He also clashes with colleagues who, according to him, label him similarly to those who carried out the deportations of people.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government or the decision-making authority (the executive), which is sharply criticized for incompetent financial decisions and deceiving the electorate. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political dishonesty (breaking promises) and on the substance of the policy (decisions unpopular with taxpayers).
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition's stance is extremely harsh, directed against the governing coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200, Social Democrats) and specific committee members (Igor Taro, Mait Klaassen, Hanah Lahe). The criticism is primarily procedural and personal, accusing them of expelling a representative of the people, suppressing the issue, and disregarding the conscience clause stipulated in the Riigikogu Member Status Act. They accuse the government of making a political decision not to support any opposition bill.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Speaker of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), accusing them of selectively applying the law and violating procedural rules. The government is criticized for failing to carry out mandatory post-impact assessments of the law regarding draft legislation, even though regulations require them. The criticism is intense and focuses on both policy (taxes) and procedural (lawmaking, breach of order) aspects.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is facing sharp criticism for a lack of personal ethics and trustworthiness stemming from her husband’s business activities in Russia. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations of lying and the alleged sharing of personal data.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at major pharmaceutical corporations (Pfizer, Moderna) and international health organizations (WHO, EMA, CDC, FDA), who are accused of greed and the abuse of public health interests. The criticism extends to Estonian state officials and the government, who allegedly violated the law and participated in illegal human experiments. Compromise is ruled out, as this constitutes criminal activity that endangers public health.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are Kaja Kallas’s government, Kaja Kallas herself, and Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev. The criticism is extremely intense and non-political, accusing the government of pursuing anti-people policies and establishing a Stalinist regime. The opposition is absolute, calling on the public to overthrow the government, thereby signaling that compromise is completely ruled out.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats) and their fiscal policy, which has been labeled "anti-people." The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (tax increases) and at procedural violations (the rapid processing of draft legislation and the lack of analysis). Separately, criticism is leveled at Annely Akkermann, the representative of the Finance Committee, and the Minister of Finance, Mart Võrklaev.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the Prosecutor's Office, citing procedural failures and the avoidance of accountability concerning the court-identified fabrication of evidence. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling for specific sanctions against the prosecutor who violated the law.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is Kaja Kallas and her government, who are being criticized for both incompetence (in defense matters) and unethical behavior (lying with factual claims in the Riigikogu). The criticism is intense and demands sanctions against government members, even referencing the possibility of taking legal action. The opposition also extends to former ministers (Taavi Aas, Keit Pentus-Rosimannus) and leaders of the Defense Forces for outdated concepts.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is with the coalition, which is being criticized for the political rejection of draft legislation—a move that threatens to send the bill to the "trash heap." The Ministry is also under fire for ostensibly restricting the right of initiative of Members of Parliament, using the justification that the work is already underway. The criticism is directed at the methodology and procedures, not the individuals, and demands consensus across political lines.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the chairing of the session and the rapporteur, sharply criticizing the disregard for the rules of procedure and the fast-track processing of the draft legislation. They also object to the supremacy of European Union directives over national tax policy, citing the distortion of the context of the accession treaties. The criticism is primarily procedural and political.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is criticized for the rigidity of the budget and for dismissing strikes as pointless, allegedly being "stuck in an Excel spreadsheet." The criticism is intense and includes both a political dimension (the budget) and a personal/ideological one (the "general's epaulets of the globalists").
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Strong criticism has been leveled against the mainstream media, who are accused of suppressing events in Germany and displaying bias. The intensity of the criticism is high, employing historically charged and negative comparisons to describe the media's silence.