Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-09-17
Political Position
The political position focuses strongly on defending democratic values and constitutionality. The speaker questions the suitability of the Riigikogu Board, referencing the accusation that they are an “authoritarian regime chatbot,” which constitutes a strongly value-based criticism. Furthermore, sharp criticism is leveled against an international agreement that appears to contradict the principle of the territorial scope of the Penal Code.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the legal field, accurately citing sections of the Constitution (§ 3) and the Penal Code (§ 6). Particular emphasis is placed on the complex issues concerning the territorial application of international law and domestic criminal law, referencing the treaty between the USA and Estonia.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp and confrontational, particularly when directed at the Riigikogu board, where a quoted personal attack ("chatbot") is employed. When addressing the Chancellor of Justice, the tone is formal and relies on logical, law-based argumentation, posing the question directly and specifically.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches were delivered during the plenary session on a single day, September 17, 2024. One speech indicates that the speaker had difficulty getting the floor ("It's good that I can finally get a word in today"). Data regarding broader patterns of activity is unavailable.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is directed against the Riigikogu Presidium, whose democratic suitability is being called into question using personal and intense criticism (the 'authoritarian regime chatbot'). Furthermore, the actions of the government or the Riigikogu are sharply criticized regarding the ratification of an international treaty that conflicts with the constitution.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no data on cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional activity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strictly on national and international topics, addressing constitutionality, the validity of criminal law, and the treaty between the US and Estonia. There is no reference to specific regional or local issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The topic of democratic values and authoritarianism, along with the question of state sovereignty, is examined within the context of the applicability of criminal law. The focus is primarily on the legal and security framework, rather than on traditional social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on ensuring adherence to existing laws (the Penal Code) and constitutional principles. The speaker functions more as a critic and an overseer, calling into question the compatibility of the international agreement with Estonian law, citing a violation of the Constitution.
2 Speeches Analyzed