Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
2024-06-03
Political Position
The political focus centers on criticizing the government's actions and failures within its IT systems—for instance, the non-operation of the Land Board's (Maa-amet) new system, which is seen as a major obstacle to providing services to citizens. Robust opposition is aimed at violations of the principles of the rule of law, demanding verification of the legitimacy of parliamentary (Riigikogu) decisions and citing the oath taken to protect the constitution. The criticism is primarily results-oriented and values-driven, accusing the Reform Party of employing tactics akin to authoritarian methods.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of information technology by criticizing flaws in the Land Board's system and proposing the use of biometric data for identity verification as a solution to enhance security. Furthermore, the speaker is knowledgeable about the processing of election complaints and issues related to the constitutional rule of law, demanding that evidence be presented.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and at times provocative, employing strong emotional expressions (e.g., quoting a citizen's question: "who is that idiot"). Sarcasm and rhetorical questions are used to express skepticism (for instance, regarding the flowers given to the minister). The speaker uses direct and dramatic comparisons, such as equating the Reform Party with Putin.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in plenary sessions, posing questions to ministers regarding the performance of IT systems and government operations. Mention is made of participation in the proceedings related to an election complaint on the same day, which indicates active involvement in both the legislative and judicial processes.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Fierce opposition is currently targeting the Reform Party, which faces criticism both for the government's failures (specifically IT systems) and for allegedly violating the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense, featuring direct comparisons to authoritarian leaders, and the Reform Party's sincerity regarding the minister retaining their position is also being questioned. Criticism is also directed at the IT minister for the system's failure.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style demonstrates an openness to discussing ideas with colleagues (e.g., with Varro regarding biometric data), while seeking technical solutions to improve security. There is no data regarding cooperation with other factions or a willingness to compromise.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A specific local incident in Saue Parish is mentioned concerning the handling of an election complaint, which draws attention to local political processes and the integrity of elections. However, the overall focus remains on national IT and rule of law issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on challenging the legality of Riigikogu decisions and the lack of supporting evidence, while simultaneously emphasizing adherence to the constitutional oath. Another priority is ensuring the functionality of government IT systems and enhancing the security of identity verification through the use of biometric data, thereby mitigating the risk of ID card theft.
4 Speeches Analyzed