Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-05-07
Political Position
The political position focuses heavily on adhering to the working procedures and constitutional principles of the Riigikogu, emphasizing the necessity of equal treatment for all members of Parliament. The speaker considers the amendment of the Riigikogu Elections Act a matter of constitutional significance, viewing it as one of the fundamental pillars of state governance. This stance is strongly procedural and value-based, requiring strict compliance with the Rules of Procedure.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in parliamentary procedural law and internal rules of procedure, citing a specific section (§ 83) concerning the expression of views during a vote. Furthermore, legal awareness regarding the hierarchy and significance of laws of constitutional importance is highlighted.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, yet simultaneously critical and demanding, focusing on logical arguments grounded in laws and internal regulations. Slight irony ("sporting spirit") is directed toward the presiding officer regarding the excessively rapid pace of procedures. The speaker also employs a direct plea for the application of a "discretionary ruling" to secure the right to speak.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of activity indicate active participation in the plenary session, where multiple interventions were made within a short period of time. All contributions were related either to procedural issues (such as the pace of the debate or violation of the rules of procedure) or to requesting the right to speak.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The objection is aimed at the actions of the presiding officer, criticizing the excessively fast pace and the potential restriction of the right to speak. Furthermore, colleague Jaak Aab was criticized for violating a specific article of the rules of procedure during the vote. The criticism is strictly procedural.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is rather demanding, but the speaker supportively references the previous speaker, Anastasia, who also emphasized the equal treatment of Riigikogu members. Overall, the focus tends to be on insisting on rule adherence rather than seeking compromises.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on amending the Riigikogu Election Act, which the speaker views as the cornerstone of state governance. The objective is to secure the floor in order to address the problematic aspects of the amendments being made to this constitutional law. Furthermore, strict adherence to the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and proceedings is also a key focus.
3 Speeches Analyzed