Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
2024-01-16
Political Position
The political focus is directed toward ensuring the accountability and operational transparency of the legal system, especially the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker criticizes the Prosecutor's Office for its inability to initiate criminal proceedings against a prosecutor who, according to a Supreme Court decision, had fabricated evidence. This position is strongly procedural and rooted in the principles of the rule of law, demanding the application of sanctions for filing illegal charges.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in criminal procedure and the administration of justice, clearly differentiating the roles of the courts (adjudication) and the Prosecutor's Office (pre-trial proceedings). Technical terminology, such as "fabricated evidence," is utilized, and sanctions under the Penal Code are referenced, underscoring the speaker's legal authority. An authoritative legal scholar (Simon Levin) is also cited regarding the necessity of respecting judicial decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, focusing on logical arguments and procedural shortcomings. The speaker utilizes a citation from a legal authority to underscore the necessity of respecting court rulings before leveling criticism against the actions of the Prosecutor's Office. The tone is serious and demands accountability, repeatedly posing questions regarding the implementation of existing mechanisms.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity involves active participation in the plenary session through the posing of questions, including requests for clarifications and follow-up questions directed to the rapporteur. The speaker actively engages in the discussion of legal topics, demanding explanations concerning the institutions' inaction.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at the Prosecutor's Office, citing procedural failures and the avoidance of accountability concerning the court-identified fabrication of evidence. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling for specific sanctions against the prosecutor who violated the law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker refers favorably to the issue raised by Kert Kingo and her legislative proposal, indicating cooperation or a convergence of views on this particular legal matter. The interaction with the rapporteur is corrective in nature (specifically concerning the role of the Prosecutor's Office), yet a polite tone is maintained.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on domestic legal system issues and central institutions (the Prosecutor's Office, the Supreme Court), as well as the current Penal Code. There is no regional or international focus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
When addressing social topics, emphasis is placed on the integrity of the administration of justice and the protection of citizens from unlawful accusations stemming from the fabrication of evidence. This focus supports the principles of the rule of law and citizens' rights in criminal proceedings.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward the creation and implementation of legislative mechanisms (levers) that regulate the accountability of the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker is taking a supportive role, referencing Kert Kingo’s draft bill, which concerns responding to violations identified in a court judgment.
2 Speeches Analyzed