Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus centers on amendments to the Riigikogu Election Act, changes viewed as being of constitutional importance and a cornerstone of state governance. The speaker is strongly fighting for the equal treatment of Riigikogu members and their right to have a voice in debates over critically important laws. The position is fundamentally procedural and value-based, emphasizing the need to avoid arbitrary decisions in the legislative process.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the hierarchy of constitutional acts, considering the Election Act constitutionally the second most important, right after the Citizenship Act. They also possess thorough knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure, specifically citing a violation of § 83 regarding the loud expression of opinions before the voting results were announced.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal, demanding, and assertive, particularly when demanding the right to speak and drawing attention to violations. The appeals are primarily logical and legal, relying on the Constitution and the rules of procedure, although the speaker ironically asks that an "arbitrary ruling" be applied to their own case. The tone concerning procedural questions is strict and urgent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The objection is aimed at the actions of the presiding officer of the Riigikogu session, who is restricting the right to debate, and is accused of potentially making "arbitrary decisions." Specifically, colleague Jaak Aab is criticized for violating Rule 83 of the Rules of Procedure, which pertains to the loud expression of opinions in the chamber before the voting results have been announced.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is evident in the reference made to the previous speaker Anastassia's position on the issue of equal treatment, which is then used to support the argument. Otherwise, the focus is on the individual right to speak, and equal treatment is demanded with representatives of the factions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the Act amending the Riigikogu Elections Act (Bill 344 SE), regarding which the speaker has expressed criticism concerning the restriction of debate. Strict adherence to the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and the highlighting of procedural violations are also key priorities.
2 Speeches Analyzed