Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position is one of strong opposition to the actions taken by the government's climate minister, particularly concerning the establishment of wind farms, highlighting their unknown effects on public health. Furthermore, a resolute position is adopted regarding the responsibilities of the Riigikogu session chairman, demanding strict legal compliance when responses are provided. These positions are fundamentally value-based, centered on protecting the health and ensuring the welfare of the Estonian people.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, citing specific sections (Section 146, subsection 8) and annotated publications. Furthermore, the argumentation relies on the World Health Organization (WHO) 2018 guideline concerning the health impacts of wind turbines. The presenter is also aware of the Health Board's capacity shortcomings when it comes to measuring the damage caused by wind turbines.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational and accusatory, containing direct accusations that the minister is lying and negligent. Simple examples (such as a car's technical inspection) are used to clarify the arguments, combining an emotional appeal ("Do you not care about the people of Estonia at all?") with legal precision. The tone is demanding and sharp.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All the speeches took place on a single day (2025-02-27) within the context of the debate on the motion of no confidence, suggesting active participation in high-profile political events. The speaker sequentially raises both procedural questions and substantive accusations.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary confrontation is with Climate Minister Yoko Alender, who is being criticized both for her policies (specifically, ignoring health impacts) and for her personal conduct (she is accused of lying). The criticism is intense and also encompasses the actions of the session chair for disregarding procedural rules. The opponent’s behavior is deemed reckless and dishonest.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Reference is made to questions submitted by other Riigikogu members (Rene Kokk, Martin Helme), which indicates cooperation in highlighting common opposition themes. Data regarding the readiness for compromise is lacking; the focus is rather on pressuring for the strict adherence to the rules.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the direct impact that the construction of wind farms has on the health of Estonian people, which indicates concern for the well-being of local communities and residents. Specific regions are not named, but the emphasis is placed on the local consequences of national policy.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A strong focus is being placed on public health issues, particularly regarding complaints stemming from the potential health impacts of wind turbines. The government is being criticized for its negligence concerning people's health, and there is a demand for the Health Board to possess the necessary expertise and equipment.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the precise application of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, demanding accountability from the session chair for securing specific answers. Furthermore, criticism is leveled against legislation that permits the establishment of wind farms without sufficient knowledge regarding their health impacts.
4 Speeches Analyzed