By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid
Total Sessions: 149
Fully Profiled: 149
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the ruling system and the coalition parties, who face criticism for disregarding democratic ideals and forfeiting public trust (citing 14.5% support). The criticism is systemic and procedural, focusing on the lack of separation of powers and the retention of power against the will of the people. The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary adversary is the Minister of Culture, who is sharply criticized for non-intervention and appealing to the concept of creative freedom. The criticism is both value-based and procedural, accusing the Minister of evading responsibility and contributing to the erosion of the national sense of belonging. No willingness to compromise has been expressed.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main targets are the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the Ministry of the Interior, who are being criticized for illegal activities and shirking responsibility in the construction of a massive data collection system. The criticism is intense and conceptual, rejecting the claim made by colleague Andre Hanimägi that a compromise had been reached regarding the draft legislation. The opposition is also aimed at the broader pressure to restrict civil liberties.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The main opponent is the government and the Reform Party, who are sharply criticized for setting political priorities and for inaction in resolving the demographic crisis. The criticism is policy- and results-based, accusing the government of disproportionate funding and previous tax changes that penalized families. The intensity is high, suggesting that the government "does not care about this matter."
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the Minister of Finance and the government's fiscal policy, criticizing both the political direction and the quality of the budget documentation. The criticism is intense and accusatory, demanding accountability and control over national defense expenditures. Furthermore, party colleague Toomas Kivimägi was criticized for misrepresenting the opposition's views.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker sharply opposes the actions of the government and the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), criticizing the lack of accountability for "mistakes, or even outright outrages," committed in the exercise of state power. The criticism is primarily procedural and constitutional, accusing the opposing side (including colleague Hanimägi and the Social Democrats) of supporting the framework of a surveillance society. He rejects any possibility of compromise regarding the support of bills that violate the constitution.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The confrontation is directed at the ruling coalition, which is accused of doing the exact opposite of fulfilling two fundamental promises (taxes and budget balance). The criticism is intense and politically charged, emphasizing that even the war in Ukraine is not a sufficient excuse for reneging on these commitments. The actions of the opponents are described as a movement away from equilibrium.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill due to the regulatory ambiguity, which grants officials excessively broad discretion. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on procedural deficiencies that could force citizens to prove their parenthood in court.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the government, who face accusations of dishonesty, misconduct, and carrying out foolish, ill-conceived operations. The criticism is particularly pointed towards the Prime Minister, who branded questions posed by members of parliament as Russian propaganda. The critique is intense and accusatory, highlighting the absence of political culture and the generation of security threats.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the parliamentary majority and the committee chairs, who are criticized for pushing through unconstitutional laws while ignoring prior warnings. The opposition is particularly fierce regarding the initiatives put forth by the Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB), the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), and the Ministry of the Interior, all of which he considers totalitarian. He demands that the bills be completely scrapped, not merely amended.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The main criticism is directed at the government representative who failed to answer the questions substantively, instead offering general remarks about the effects of the war, which points to dissatisfaction with the government's transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the speaker asks his colleague Peeter Ernits not to interrupt while the question is being posed, which constitutes a procedural objection. The criticism is aimed at the concealment of information and the provision of vague answers.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the insufficient preparation and competence of the majority of Riigikogu members to carry out their constitutional oversight duties. This is procedural and competence-based criticism regarding the quality of the exercise of legislative power, and it is not directed at a specific political opponent.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence and the responsible minister, whose proposed solution (hiring additional staff) is deemed insufficient. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failure, organizational confusion, and the avoidance of responsibility.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the health minister, who is sharply criticized for both political hypocrisy and spreading misinformation. The attacks are intense, accusing the minister of personally practicing "quackery" and supporting a "dictatorial program." The criticism is aimed at both political gain (achieving the ministerial position through misinformation) and the suppression of fundamental rights.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The main targets are the Minister of Defence and the ministry's leadership, who are severely criticized for systemic financial mismanagement and refusing to take responsibility. The criticism is intense, demanding the resignation of the Minister and the Secretary-General. Furthermore, the presiding officer of the session is also criticized for ignoring procedural matters.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary targets are the governing coalition and the Riigikogu Presidium, who face intense criticism regarding both political decisions (tax increases, funding for abortions) and systematic procedural breaches. Specifically, the Presidium is accused of denying opposition members the right to ask questions and arbitrarily interpreting the Law on Internal Rules and Procedure. The criticism is severe, and there is an uncompromising demand for strict adherence to the law.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is Jaanus Karilaid and the majority supporting the bill, who are accused of violating the constitution and restricting religious freedom. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the opponents of pushing through political ambitions under the pretext of a security threat. The speaker criticizes the opponents for following the example of the Soviet Union when interfering in religious matters, and for attempting to create the image of a patriot.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at law enforcement agencies (the Financial Intelligence Unit, the Police and Border Guard Board, the Internal Security Service) and government politicians (interior ministers) who are suspected of corruption and cooperation with the criminal world. The speaker sharply criticizes the handling of the draft bill, viewing it as a potential action to retroactively legalize previous mass data collection. The opposition is intense and stems from a lack of credibility in these structures, which is why they refuse to grant them additional tools.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and specific ministers, criticizing their unreliability during negotiations and their tendency to distance themselves from responsibility. The criticism is intense and is justified both by conflicts of values (such as the bringing in of prisoners) and by procedural violations (the concealment of negotiations).
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the bill's proponents and the coalition, who are accused of deliberately adopting an unconstitutional law and using a false security argument. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the political objective (forcing the church) and procedural disregard (ignoring the president's criticism and making only cosmetic changes).
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The opposition is aimed directly at the government and the prime minister, criticizing both specific political decisions (such as bringing in prisoners) and the broader results of their governance (societal polarization, tax hikes). The criticism is intense and directly accuses the government of causing a drastic decline in the Estonian people's sense of societal belonging since taking office. They also criticize the government for ignoring Kapo's (Internal Security Service) assessments regarding security threats.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at the University of Tartu's higher management level for tolerating the decline in the standard of legal education, and at the Riigikogu majority for the prevailing indifference toward the constitution. The criticism is institutional and focuses on competence deficits, noting that political ambitions often subordinate the constitution.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the law enforcement structures (PPA) for their independent actions ("going rogue" or "running amok") and the government (the Prime Minister, Minister of the Interior, Minister of Justice) for their alleged ignorance or avoidance of responsibility. The criticism is intense and procedural, focusing on the fact that the government is attempting to hastily cobble together a legal basis instead of resolving the question of accountability. The speaker finds the ministers' claimed ignorance extremely implausible or notes that it points to a serious failure of political leadership.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and specific ministers (Jürgen Ligi, Kristen Michal, Riina Sikkut). The criticism is intense, spanning from political disagreements (quotas, taxes) to ethical accusations (lying regarding sanctions and breaking promises). The government stands accused of totalitarian behavior and being undemocratic.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
A strong opposition stance against the government (the Minister of Defence and the Prime Minister), criticizing their actions for a lack of political accountability in the handling of the maritime incident. The opposition rejects the minister's attempt to label the criticism as a Russian narrative, viewing it as an unfair tactic. The criticism is primarily procedural and based on demanding political responsibility.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who are accused of lying, deception, and raising taxes without a mandate from the voters. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of shifting responsibility (e.g., blaming Putin), as well as a demand for snap elections. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy and the ethical and procedural aspects of the government's activities.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition's stance is strong, criticizing the government's competence in ensuring border security and managing the economy. The criticism is aimed at political and strategic failure, demanding answers as to why productivity targets are being abandoned. Adversaries are being called upon to acknowledge negative facts regarding immigration and the economy.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the coalition majority and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who stand accused of "blatant dishonesty" and disregarding the constitution for political ends. The opposition is intense and addresses both political culture and procedural unfairness. The possibility of compromise on the core issue of unconstitutionality is ruled out, with warnings issued against merely cosmetic changes.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The standoff is aimed at the government (the Prime Minister, Minister of the Interior Taro, and Minister of Justice Pakosta) and state institutions (the PPA and the Ministry of the Interior), who are being criticized for massive legal violations. The criticism is both procedural and value-based, accusing officials of breaking the law and evading accountability. The speaker deems it unacceptable that the system is simply being sanctioned without any prior accountability being established.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government coalition and the Minister of Justice, particularly regarding the appointment of coalition representatives (members of the Reform Party and Estonia 200) to the Council for the Administration of Courts. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, accusing the coalition of violating the principle of separation of powers and demonstrating an unwillingness to involve the opposition. Furthermore, the bill's proponents are criticized for disregarding the opinion of the judiciary.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism targets the actions of former Social Democrat Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets regarding the restriction of firearm licenses, which is viewed as undermining national defense capabilities. He also sharply criticizes officials and the government for disregarding the law in the implementation of "gender ideology," accusing them of suffering from an "ideological itch."
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong procedural opposition to the Government of the Republic and the ministries for the systemic disregard of norms concerning good legislative practice. It criticizes the stance of the Minister of Justice, which would permit selectivity in the analysis of constitutionality, calling this the threat of the emergence of arbitrary law. The opposition is aimed at the government's inaction and political unwillingness to resolve the issue.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition has been heavily criticized for incompetence in carrying out economic analyses, as they rely on primitive calculations that fail to account for reality. The criticism is also aimed at the procedural level, with suspicions that the opinions of the organizations involved are not being substantively considered. The speaker rejects the opposition's accusation that the bill's presenters failed to do their work.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is with the prime minister and the government, who are being criticized for ignoring the constitution, failing to conduct risk analysis, and using manipulative rhetoric. The criticism is intense and includes both substantive accusations (the risk of forfeiting NATO defense) and procedural ones (ignoring the decision-making authority of the Riigikogu). The speaker accuses the prime minister of public bragging and demonstrating poor standards.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is directed at the Social Democrats, who are accused of programmatic hostility toward the principles of democracy and the rule of law, citing as an example their desire to criminalize hate speech. The government is sharply criticized for procedural deficiencies, as the required constitutional analysis is missing from the 180-page explanatory memorandum. The speaker sees an irreconcilable conflict between the draft bill and the constitution.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the parties forming the government coalition, who stand accused of acting against the interests of Estonian society and instead serving narrow corporate interests. The criticism is extremely intense, ranging from standard political opposition to accusations that bear the hallmarks of fraud. The speaker is even considering appealing to the State Prosecutor's Office, a move that would completely rule out any compromise.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the Republic Electoral Committee (VVK) and the head of the Election Service, Arne Koitmäe. Koitmäe is accused of deliberately misleading the public regarding election procedures, and he is considered a security risk and a threat to democracy. The criticism is intense, focusing both on procedural violations (the public nature of meetings) and shortcomings in system security.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the current decision-making process, which fails to take into account the opinions of local residents and risks simply steamrolling them. The opposition is procedural, demanding greater transparency and public involvement to prevent a situation where decisions are made without public consent.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at those who are planning offshore wind farms without the consent of the public and local communities. The criticism is both procedural (a lack of democracy) and economic (the allocation of subsidies), emphasizing that this is far too serious an issue to be decided without public participation.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at members of the ruling coalition (such as colleagues Timpson and Sutrop), who are being accused of hypocrisy and knowingly adopting legislation that violates the constitution. The criticism is both substantive (policy-based) and procedural, highlighting how previous warnings (for example, those made by Rene Kokk) were callously voted down.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition to the government and the ruling coalition, criticizing them both for their policy choices (raising taxes, attacking large families and homeowners) and for procedural failures (lying, hiring a PR firm). They are further accused of staunchly defending the banking sector and increasing security threats. The criticism is intense and fundamental, precluding any possibility of compromise.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Criticism has been directed against the government and the responsible ministry due to a lack of transparency regarding the distribution of 100 million euros to the Estonian defense industry. The attacks are procedural and include implications of potential conflicts of interest, directly questioning the involvement of former high-ranking officials with the companies that received the funding.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed against the bill’s presenter or supporter, who is being criticized for inaccurately presenting the content of the law (specifically, claiming there is a lack of sanctions). The criticism is intense and fact-based, demanding a public admission from the opponent that their previous assertions were false.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the proponents of the bill (including former Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets and the Social Democrats), who are accused of mendacity, intolerance, and disregard for the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense and fundamental, claiming that the bill does not reduce but rather increases security threats. The speaker urges people not to comply with the state's unjust directives.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and colleague Anti Allas, accusing them of having forgotten about compensating reservists for eight years and conceptually rejecting the draft bill without basis. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's priorities, highlighting the annual salary increase for Riigikogu members as an irony. The criticism is intense and addresses both political priorities and procedural matters.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The main adversaries are the governing coalition, especially Eesti 200 (who are accused of disregarding democratic ideals and lacking a mandate) and the Social Democrats (whose members head the ERJK). Criticism is aimed both at policy (tax hikes, family policy) and procedures (the absence of constitutional analysis). The ERJK is characterized as a politically biased body, where "complete control is entirely in their hands," and compromise regarding the draft bill is ruled out.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker indirectly criticizes the current national policy and the politicians who fail to translate the valuing of motherhood from words into action. The criticism is directed at the substance of the policy, not at individuals or procedures.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the government, the former Science Council (Irja Lutsar), and the agencies responsible for drug safety surveillance (the Health Board, the Ministry of Social Affairs), who are accused of conflicts of interest and covering up errors. The criticism is intense, describing the government's actions regarding pressure to vaccinate children as a "brutal outrage" and accusing the media and the courts of providing cover for the government. There is no willingness to compromise, as demands are being made for an immediate investigation and accountability.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker opposes those who rejected the bill concerning the mandatory appearance of ministers, criticizing their stance as pragmatic and sidestepping universal rules. The criticism is directed at the coalition parties and ministers who may invoke their sovereign right to evade parliamentary scrutiny. The attacks are procedural and grounded in political consistency.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The main criticism is directed at the government's actions, particularly concerning the divergence in security policy and core values compared to the new US administration. The criticism is intense, labeling certain statements as "senseless yapping" and accusing the government of damaging Estonia's interests. Specifically, politicians Ilves and Mihkelson are criticized for their anti-US rhetoric.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the minister and the government, who stand accused of systematic deceit, concealment, and repeatedly dodging questions. The criticism is fiercely intense, ranging from demands for political accountability all the way up to suggestions of criminal charges and jail time. Compromise is off the table; only resignation is being demanded.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the government and the initiators of the bills, who are criticized for using the security threat as a mere slogan without providing substantive arguments. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural unfairness, accusing the opponents of utilizing state secrets to bolster their political argument. He warns that the government’s actions are creating a pretext for Russian intervention.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government (especially Interior Minister Läänemets) and the bill's supporters, who are being accused of demagoguery, ignorance, and infringing upon religious freedom. The criticism is intense, focusing on political incompetence and the trampling of the principles of the rule of law. The speaker asserts that the opponents' actions are hostile and provoke a genuine security threat, meaning compromise is ruled out and the bill must be rejected.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary adversary is the government coalition, which is being criticized for restricting religious freedom and increasing security risks. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of replacing dialogue with threats issued from a position of strength, and abandoning the ideals of democracy and religious freedom.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, whose resignation is being demanded due to the loss of public trust. The criticism is intense and encompasses both political failures (tax hikes, family policy) and ethical/legal questions (a criminal pattern in the energy sector, attacks against the rule of law). Instead of seeking compromise, the demand is for accountability.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary conflict is between the government and the relevant minister, who is being criticized for failing to present concrete facts that would justify the mandatory closure. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, accusing the opposing party of having allowed "sober judgment to switch off" whenever Moscow-themed keywords are mentioned. Compromise is ruled out if the principles of the rule of law are violated.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition targets the government's foreign policy and strategic choices, which are accused of obediently adhering to allied guidelines. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, raising doubts about the protection of Estonia's national interests. The opponent's viewpoints are presumed to be purely rejectionist and unfounded.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the government's actions, particularly the procedure used to adopt the energy sector development plan. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural deficiencies (rushing the process) and the disregard for financial accountability (the issue of costs running into billions). The speaker points out that the government failed to involve independent experts and businesses.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the speaker and the viewpoint they represent, which is being labeled as ideological and scientifically unfounded. The criticism is intense and substantive, denying the opposing party's claimed scientific consensus and calling it pure ideological brainwashing.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the supporters of the draft application currently being processed and the Government of the Republic, particularly Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, whose activities in Georgia are being labeled as a violation of diplomatic norms and uncivilized behavior. The criticism is intense and accusatory, claiming that the opponents are relying on falsehoods and are engaged in applying technologies aimed at overthrowing an undemocratic regime. No possibility for compromise is being offered, as the draft is considered to be founded upon a false premise.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed against the foreign policy of the Government of the Republic of Estonia, particularly the policy led by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna. The criticism is both political and procedural, questioning the criteria for intervention and the selectivity involved, which demonstrates strong opposition to the government's foreign policy actions.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The pushback is aimed at those who demand the largest national defense budget without analyzing specific procurements, accusing them of relying on slogans and avoiding substantive debate. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling into question the quality and transparency of the discussion.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism targets the speed of the government's energy transition plan, which is deemed premature given the vulnerability of the existing infrastructure. The opposition is strictly policy- and risk-based, avoiding personal attacks and focusing instead on the potential consequences of these political decisions.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Climate, citing a procedural shortcoming—specifically, the absence of a comprehensive planning overview—and demanding clarification regarding the realism of the ambitious energy policy goal. Furthermore, the criticism targets the government’s failure to ensure transparency and the ambiguity surrounding the policy’s feasibility.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main opponent is the Foreign Minister, whose actions regarding Georgia are deemed intervention contrary to international law and damaging to Estonia's reputation. Strong criticism is also directed at the Speaker of the Riigikogu for bias and violating procedural rules, as they allow the government representative to use baseless accusations ("Kremlin narratives") and engage in misconduct. The criticism is both political and procedural.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Minister of Justice and the Government of the Republic, who are sharply criticized for violating good legislative practice and failing to conduct constitutional analyses. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the government of allowing problems to recur year after year and noting that public confidence in the government has dropped. The speaker also criticizes the bias within the judicial system.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic, criticizing its setting of priorities in wind energy planning (national defense prioritized over health) and the overriding of parliamentary rights when deciding on military missions. The criticism is intense, addressing both the political substance and procedural aspects, and demands a public commitment from the government.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism targets a conceptual flaw in the draft bill concerning the use of a state fee as a form of punishment. The opposition is focused on policy and procedure, stressing that the 800-euro charge essentially corresponds to the description of a fine, not the definition of a state fee.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism targets the assumptions and the approach that dictates phosphorite mining should occur via a concession mechanism. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, calling into question the rationality of this approach.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The primary confrontation is directed against the Government of the Republic, which is sharply criticized on moral grounds for funding abortions and is labeled anti-child and anti-family. The criticism is intense and value-driven, calling into question the government's credibility in ensuring the well-being of children.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are coalition politicians (including Hanno Pevkur, Alar Laneman, Kalev Stoicescu, Raimond Kaljulaid). They are being criticized both for their political decisions (unconstitutional blank mandates, the security tax) and for unethical behavior (lying, dredging up slanderous rumors). The criticism is intense, and there is no mention of compromise; instead, the demand is that they take their oath of office seriously.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the supporters of the current draft bill and, more broadly, at those who create complex norms or fail to take child protection seriously. The criticism is both value-based and procedural, accusing opponents of being purely declarative and neglecting to take necessary simple steps. It also criticizes the Government of the Republic for continuing the state funding of abortion.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main adversaries are advocates and scientists who present the thesis of anthropogenic climate warming, along with the measures implemented by the European Union. The criticism is intense and methodical, accusing the opposing side of lacking evidence and spreading "total lies." This opposition is aimed directly at the assumptions underpinning the policy.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed both at the presiding officer of the session (for violating the rules of procedure) and at the bill's proponents, who are criticized for irresponsible handling without conducting security analyses. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural correctness and the ignoring of security threats, noting that this approach may be irresponsible.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The main opposition is directed against Minister of the Interior Läänemets and the government, who are being criticized for the misuse of the security assessment card. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding reasoned analyses and facts from the government that would justify the restriction of voting rights. The Minister of the Interior’s claims regarding the Pühtitsa Convent are being called "a ridiculously false narrative."
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The main opponent is "the government coalition you lead," which is criticized for its tax policy and the justifications provided for security funding. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, questioning the actual impact of the tax hikes on Estonia's defense capabilities. The speaker suggests that the government's claims about ensuring security do not reflect reality.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party and the government, who stand accused of financial incompetence and untrustworthy rhetoric. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political choices (tax hikes, ideological funding) as well as procedural issues (budgetary opacity and the stifling of parliamentarism). There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the futility of the opposition's work is being emphasized.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government, which is being accused of violating the constitution (harassment of the monastery), increasing security risks, and ignoring diplomacy. The criticism is intense and also contains a personal element, demanding that the prime minister promise not to leave the country in the event of war and referencing the behavior of the former prime minister. The search for compromise is not mentioned.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the ruling government coalition (including the Reform Party and Madis Timpson), who are sharply criticized for policies hostile to families and indifferent to the demographic crisis. The criticism targets specific political decisions (cutting family benefits, the car tax, and revoking health insurance for stay-at-home mothers) and procedural conduct (the "trashing" or shelving of opposition bills and limiting debate). The speaker accuses the coalition of despicable behavior and irrationality.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the Minister of Defence and the government, who are criticized for disregarding the constitution and delegating the decision-making authority of the Riigikogu (Parliament). The criticism is intense and procedural, accusing the government of using expedient measures and violating international law in the context of Syria. The speaker asserts that voting in favor of the current draft bill would constitute a breach of oath, which rules out any compromise regarding the substance of the legislation.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Riigikogu, who have set green transition targets that are far more ambitious than those of the European Union. The criticism is policy-driven, calling into question the economic rationale behind the goals and the prioritization process. The government is also criticized for its inaction regarding demographic issues.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition's stance is extremely intense, demanding the resignation of the Minister of Internal Affairs due to unlawful activity (the Lihula monument). The criticism targets both political ambitions (MPÕK) and personal credibility, accusing ministers of lying and unethical conduct. The speaker also criticizes the internal cooperation within the coalition, dismissing it as mere political theater.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The key adversaries are the government and its members (the Prime Minister, Interior Minister Läänemets), who face criticism both for legal transgressions (the police actions in Lihula) and for unjust economic policies (specifically, renewable energy subsidies). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of violating the sanctity of private property and of the wasteful channeling of taxpayer money toward profitable enterprises.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are commercial banks, who are accused of raking in unearned profits, and those who prioritize investor appeal over protecting the public. The opponents’ views are being discredited by pointing to the salaries of SEB analysts, which allegedly prevents them from objectively understanding the situation. The criticism is intense and carries an ethical undertone.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government (for obstructing the Lihula monument and for their planned hate speech legislation) and specific colleagues. Jürgen Ligi was personally and intensely attacked, accused of "vulgar lying" regarding his comments on a female colleague's appearance, and was demanded to man up and apologize. The government's actions regarding the Lihula matter are considered "shameful" and rights-violating.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is with the government, whose answers are considered contradictory, confusing, and insufficient. Criticism is directed both at the government’s procedural incompetence (a violation of the constitution) and the belittling of those posing the questions. The speaker intensifies the confrontation by asking whether the government’s disparaging attitude also extends to the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the bill's proponents (the government), who are accused of promoting anti-family ideology and lying in the explanatory memorandum. The criticism is intense and ideologically charged, questioning the opposing side's goals to alter family models through legislation. There is no willingness to compromise, as the draft bill is being called "completely nonsensical."
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is clearly in an opposition role, criticizing the commission and the coalition for their failure to prevent a situation where convicted pedophiles could work with children. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and procedural loopholes, demanding an explanation from their opponents as to why the necessary amendments were not introduced.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition is aimed at the government and state officials, who are criticized for a lack of transparency, lack of accountability, and wasting taxpayer money. The criticism is systemic, calling into question the integrity of the electoral system and the government's mandate. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, concrete answers and accountability are being demanded.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government’s tax policy, particularly the plan to implement a new motor vehicle tax, which the speaker argues duplicates the existing excise duty. Criticism is also directed at previous governments for failing to restore the connection between fuel excise duty and road funding, and demands explanations from the responsible minister regarding the proportions of state budget expenditure.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The opposition is aimed at the practice of ministries, under both previous and current governments, of ignoring the mandatory constitutional analysis. Ministers Yoko Alender and Vladimir Svet are particularly criticized for their proposal to essentially abolish or restrict this requirement. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, citing as an example the Ministry of Climate’s draft bill, whose 110-page explanatory memorandum contained no reference to the constitution.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary confrontation is directed at the Reform Party government and the Prime Minister, who are accused of a lack of transparency and accountability in the allocation of taxpayer funds. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural violations, such as the failure to hold public tenders and the disregard for the state budget's explanatory memorandum.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Riigikogu (due to the laws it adopted) and the Chancellor of Justice, who is accused of failing to initiate proceedings. The criticism is both procedural and political, suggesting that the Chancellor of Justice feels political pressure to avoid sensitive issues.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker is in fierce opposition to the governing coalition, criticizing their conduct for the systematic rejection of opposition draft legislation. Separate criticism is leveled against the Social Democrats (SDE) for their discussions concerning the seizure of assets, which is deemed a criminal mindset. The criticism is both procedural and value-based.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The opposition is directed at both the current government (Prime Minister Michal) and the former government (Juhan Parts), who are accused of behavior that wounds national honor. The criticism is intense and focuses on the moral and legal justification of the government's actions, claiming that it constitutes a "manifest violation of the law."
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government led by the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized both for its policies (tax hikes) and its procedures (deceiving voters and lacking a mandate). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of having concealed their plans and now doing whatever they want.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is criticized for breaking election promises and undermining state values. The criticism is intense, ranging from political opposition (taxation) to moral condemnation (the desecration of sacred values). A compromise regarding the draft bill is completely ruled out.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary focus of the opposition is directed against the judicial system (especially the Supreme Court), which is accused of failing to provide a substantive assessment and shirking responsibility. Furthermore, the government/coalition is sharply criticized for imposing unlawful restrictions and for ignoring the criminal procedure reform for five years. The criticism is both procedural and political, noting that the situation is a complete disgrace.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna and the majority of the Riigikogu, who support interference in Georgia’s internal affairs. The criticism is intense, focusing on political misconduct and the application of double standards. The opposition is rooted in both political and principled grounds, ruling out any compromise regarding the issue of intervention.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The respondent (to whom the questions were posed) is criticized for the lack of clarity in evaluating the implications of Ukraine's accession and for the failure to define the conditions under which such accession would not be supported. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, indicating that key facts remain unresolved for the respondent.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of systematic anti-business hostility and deceit (denial of tax hikes). The criticism is intense, addressing both substantive policies and procedural violations (the bundling of amendments contrary to the Rules of Procedure Act). Compromise is ruled out, with a promise to repeal the laws at the earliest opportunity.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the government and the Tax Board, accusing them of distrusting Estonian entrepreneurs and planning to scrutinize all bank accounts. It sharply criticizes coalition members of parliament, especially the Reform Party, linking their objections regarding privacy issues to the Chinese totalitarian model and the COVID dictatorship. Disappointment is expressed that the coalition might vote against the child protection bill without providing substantive arguments.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government, which is being criticized for evading responsibility and shifting the tax burden onto citizens. The government also faces sharp criticism for ignoring the concerns of landowners, who are protesting the continuous encumbrance of their property and the lack of compensation.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who is being criticized for blatant interference in Georgia's internal affairs and for violating diplomatic norms. The criticism is principled, focusing on the inconsistency and double standards inherent in the government's actions. The confrontation is intense and uncompromising regarding the principle of international non-interference.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, including Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party members on the Finance Committee. The criticism is intense and personal, directly accusing the opponent of lying and breaking election promises. The criticism targets both the political substance (the retraction of promises) and procedural actions (supporting the draft legislation in the committee).
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Social Affairs, who are criticized for failing to protect the right to life of unborn children and for the mass funding of abortion. The criticism is intense and accusatory, stressing that the government itself decided to fund abortion, rather than merely fulfilling a legal obligation. The government's priorities in funding public opinion campaigns (e.g., COVID campaigns, "Diversity Enriches") are also criticized.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the authors of the draft legislation (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and its supporters, who are accused of bending the constitution and "pushing Estonia into harm's way." Specific officials (Kaupo Rosin, Jonatan Vseviov) are criticized for the absence of a risk analysis. The criticism is political, procedural, and personal, faulting Mr. Terras for "ugly labeling" when attaching the tag of being pro-Kremlin.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main confrontation is with the government and the prime minister, who are criticized for bypassing the constitution and leading Estonia into war. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, as the government has allegedly sent special forces operatives to Ukraine without a mandate from the Riigikogu. The speaker intensely rejects being labeled as a spreader of Kremlin narratives, claiming that they stand for the interests of the Riigikogu and the Estonian people.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the political forces that altered the definition of marriage in June 2023, and hypothetically, also at any court that might impede the restoration of the traditional definition. The criticism focuses on the durability of the legislation and the limits of constitutionality, and is not personal in nature.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the banking sector, which violates the principles of non-discrimination by excluding people from public life. Strong opposition is also directed at government institutions (the minister, the Security Police Board) who make claims about the involvement of Russian special services without sufficient factual evidence. The speaker criticizes the alleged hybrid operation as "bungling" and "kindergarten level."
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the ruling coalition, whose legitimacy is being called into question because of the untrustworthiness of the e-elections. The criticism is procedural as well as political, accusing the coalition of both denying and exacerbating the problems (for instance, through the introduction of m-elections). He/She warns that downplaying the issue of electoral integrity is dangerous and will ultimately lead to civil disobedience.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The opposition's stance is directed at the ruling parties and those responsible for procedural decisions (e.g., Mr. Odinets). The criticism is both political (regarding the taxation of banks) and strongly procedural (a violation of the rules of procedure when bundling amendments). The accusations are intense, pointing to personal gain and the "blunt steamrolling" of the opposition's objections.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opposition is directed against the government (the Prime Minister), which is being criticized for disregarding the Constitution and for diminishing the authority of the Riigikogu when undertaking international obligations. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the government of ambiguity and potentially misleading the public. The third speaker criticizes a colleague (Urmas Reinsalu) for violating the rules governing the information session.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
A strong oppositional stance is aimed at the supporters of the current electoral system and the political culture that disregards the public's distrust. The criticism is both procedural and value-based, accusing opponents of "arrogant negligence" and exacerbating the issue through e-voting. The speaker warns that such actions could lead to a "silent era or dictatorship," meaning compromise on the question of electoral integrity is out of the question.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main criticism is directed at the government member (likely the Minister of Education), demanding they take responsibility and resign over the administrative blunder. Furthermore, the opponent's alleged ideological position is being criticized for contradicting the constitutional mandate, enshrined in the preamble, to preserve Estonian identity. The criticism is intense and demands political accountability.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Board of the Riigikogu (due to the timing of the proceedings and evasion of responsibility) and the governing coalition, especially Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets. The criticism is intense, accusing them of deliberately offending Orthodox believers and creating illegal preconditions for the forced dissolution of the religious association. No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, the demand is for answers and accountability.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
A strong oppositional stance has been taken against the Minister of Justice and the government, criticizing them both for procedural deficiencies (specifically, the absence of an impact analysis) and their broader fiscal policy decisions. The criticism is intense, explicitly linking the proposed increase in fines to the government's wider pattern of tax hikes. Compromise is ruled out, with the opposition submitting a motion to reject the draft legislation entirely.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, who are criticized for failing to fulfill their constitutional obligation and for the state funding of abortions. The criticism is intense, focusing on political inconsistency and moral character. The personal attack by colleague Karmen Joller, who called those demanding legislation "evil," is also directly refuted.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed against those responsible for the Riigikogu's procedural rules (the committee/presiding officer), criticizing procedural violations in the bundling of amendments and demanding written criteria. The government's stance on the reliability of internet voting is also criticized, highlighting the low level of public trust.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
Strong opposition to the government, particularly Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the Minister of Defense, who are accused of evading answers and engaging in potentially unconstitutional activities. Criticism is aimed at the legality and lack of transparency of the government’s actions regarding the deployment of the Defense Forces and the negotiation of international treaties. He/She warns that the government’s actions could lead Estonia into direct military conflict with Russia.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government, particularly the prime minister, who is being criticized for a lack of transparency and for failing to inform the Riigikogu (Parliament). The criticism targets both procedural violations (disregard for the constitution) and substantive actions (the potential deployment of special forces personnel to Ukraine). The speaker suggests that the government has taken steps that "could be interpreted as entering into war with Russia," which highlights the high intensity of the attacks.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main adversaries are the government (specifically Foreign Minister Tsahkna and the Minister of Education) and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of betraying its constitutional duties, acting with indignity, and suffering from ideological blindness. The Minister of Education's views are labeled "profoundly unscientific," while the actions of the diplomats are described as "out of place" and "inappropriate."
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary confrontation is with the coalition, which is being criticized both for supporting an inefficient oversight system and for previous, value-based legislation. The criticism is aimed at a specific coalition MP (Mr. Randpere) and is intense, accusing the coalition of irreversibly disrupting the working environment of the Legal Affairs Committee.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is directed at the government/minister, whose previous response is considered improper and essentially left unanswered. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the lack of transparency and the interpretation of the parliamentary mandate (Decision 317). The intensity of the critique is moderate yet demanding, emphasizing the fundamental necessity of providing a response.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, the ruling coalition, and the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA). The criticism is extremely intense, accusing the opponents of deceiving voters, misinterpreting the constitution, and abusing their power. The speaker demands the resignation of the Minister of the Interior due to the PPA's pattern of illegal conduct.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party, which is accused of continuing the e-voting system to ensure its political success, and at government officials (Minister of Justice Kalle Laanet, Chancellor of Justice) for their uncritical attitude. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, focusing on the disregard for democratic principles and the lack of trustworthiness. The speaker considers it irresponsible to ignore the distrust of 40% of citizens and points to suspicions of election fraud.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A strong opposition is directed against the Public Prosecution Office and the Internal Security Service (Kapo), which are criticized for the abuse of power, filing unfounded charges, and causing reputational damage. The Ministry of Justice is criticized for its inaction in initiating legislative amendments, with demands that prosecutors who bring baseless charges to court should lose their jobs. The criticism is both procedural (unlawful detention) and substantive (the vagueness of the law).
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The main targets of criticism are the governing coalition, the Minister of Finance, and the Prime Minister, all of whom are accused of incompetence and worsening the situation for families. The criticism is aimed both at specific political decisions (tax hikes, the elimination of subsidies) and at underlying values and attitudes (the distortion of the concept of marriage). Furthermore, statements made by the Commander of the Defense Forces regarding the country’s defense capabilities are also being criticized.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the policies of the prime minister and the government, which are being criticized for leading Estonia toward war. The criticism is intense, focusing on both substantive deficiencies (the threat of intervention in the war) and procedural shortcomings (the demagogic avoidance of providing answers). This opposition is also being directed at the chair of the session, who fails to intervene or instruct the prime minister to answer the questions.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Strong opposition is aimed at the Riigikogu majority (the coalition) and apparently also a segment of the opposition, who are accused of undermining the democratic constitutional order. The criticism is fundamental, claiming that the majority is voting down the bill in order to relentlessly implement a predetermined political agenda. The speaker's intensity is extremely high, declaring that most members of the Riigikogu do not want Estonia to be a democratic state.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government, who are sharply criticized both for their policies (cutting benefits, missetting priorities) and their intellectual level. The criticism is intense and accuses the government of systematically dictating to citizens (the car tax, COVID-era measures, the criminalization of hate speech). The confrontation is uncompromising and calls into question the motives of political opponents.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponents are the Prime Minister, who is being criticized for evading concrete answers, and the chair of the session, who is accused of defending a coalition partner. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the government's potentially dangerous security policy and the violation of parliamentary procedural rules. The speaker deems the opponents' conduct unfair and dishonest.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed against the state or government that is pushing through the plan to close rural schools. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the unfair burden placed on students, which comes at the expense of their hobbies and free time. The intensity of the attack is high, drawing a comparison to forced labor.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government coalition, which is sharply criticized for its political priorities (banks vs. families) and ideological inconsistency. The criticism is intense, ranging from specific political details to moral accusations (violation of the oath of office, defending the plundering of the people), demanding the removal of the government as soon as possible. Sarcasm is also employed, with people asking for the minister's phone number in order to convey the concerns of those who oppose the car tax.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition expressed toward the objective of the draft bill; instead, critical questions are raised regarding the suitability of the chosen procedure (denunciation). The criticism targets the procedural risk assessment, proposing an alternative solution (suspension).
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Criticism is directed towards the government and the structures operating under its authority, which are suspected of political manipulation and fear-mongering. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) for employing double standards when initiating misdemeanor proceedings, as well as the session chair for behavior favoring the coalition, which undermines the quality of the information hour.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is "the current government," which is sharply criticized for its policies (tax policy, over-regulation) and its inability to consider important proposals. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, and it expresses a strong conviction that the government is taking nothing into account.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the government, which is accused of avoiding uncomfortable truths and lacking critical self-analysis. The criticism is political and focuses on the lack of consistency in foreign policy, demanding a concrete action plan for the withdrawal of Estonian forces from Iraq.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Data is scarce.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed at the decision-makers responsible for the tax increases (the government). The criticism is purely policy-based, questioning the logic and justification behind the introduction of the new VAT rates (especially the 14% rate).
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the majority of the parliamentary committee, which voted 5:1 to reject the draft bill. The criticism is procedural, accusing them of labeling the issue a "pseudo-problem" and refusing to involve stakeholders or experts. The opposition is intense, suggesting a desire to kill the bill immediately, right in the bud.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opponent is the Government of the Republic, particularly the Reform Party government, which is criticized for systematic procedural violations in the legislative process. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's unwillingness to take the constitution seriously and its abandonment of the idea of the nation-state. The opposition targets both policy (the legalization of same-sex marriage) and procedures.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opposition is directed against the actions of the government and security agencies (PPA, KAPO) regarding the non-extension of Metropolitan Eugeni's residence permit. Criticism targets both the political prudence of the decision (straining relations with Russia) and its factual basis, demanding evidence be presented that the church leader supports the aggressor. The opposition is intense, as the action is being labeled "persecution."
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at officials and politicians who ignore serious public health risks, as well as those who present inaccurate data regarding the tax burden (falsely claiming it is only 33%). The opposition targets political inaction, a lack of transparency, and the inability to address issues of significant social importance. A particular point of contention is the absence of public debate on crucial subjects.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the government and the Reform Party, who stand accused of abandoning liberal principles and implementing totalitarian methods. The criticism is intense, being both policy- and ideology-based, and specifically accuses the minister of failing to provide substantive answers.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticizes the coalition MPs for their passivity in the debate and for voting down draft legislation without substantive discussion. He/She also criticizes the stance of the Ministry of Justice and the government, which views the proposal as posing a problem regarding the separation of powers, and more broadly, state structures (PPA, police chiefs) for their lack of accountability when making unlawful decisions.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are criticized both for their policies (anti-family measures, lack of a demographic plan) and for their ethics and procedures (failure to respond, suspicion of a cover-up in the Lehtme case). The criticism is intense and accusatory, implying that the government's true interests (cheap labor) outweigh the interests of aiding Ukraine. The speaker shows no willingness to compromise, instead demanding an honest admission of the government's actions.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the coalition's political culture, which dictates the automatic rejection of opposition bills, regardless of their substance. He/She accuses the current regulation of ideological coercion and humiliating treatment, viewing the threat of human trafficking as little more than a contrived excuse. He/She criticizes the state's approach, which presumes citizens' dishonesty rather than trust.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.