By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits
Total Sessions: 50
Fully Profiled: 50
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi and the government, who face intense criticism both for their policies (specifically, the refusal to lower VAT) and for alleged personal statements. The speaker attacks the opposing side's motives, claiming the minister views the populace as "stupid and fat." This resistance is characterized as persistent and "evasive at all costs."
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the government coalition (referred to as the "long plan party") and the leadership of the European Commission, particularly Baroness von der Leyen. The criticism is intense and targets both the substance (EU budget priorities) and the procedure (the Riigikogu acting as a rubber stamp and the rushing of debates). The government is accused of losing the public's trust and moving away from a democratic rule of law towards a "sovereign state."
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and ministers, who stand accused of hubris, budgetary imprecision, and setting the wrong priorities. The criticism is both substantive (concerning political decisions) and procedural, highlighting the chaos in the chamber and the absence of ministers (for example, the finance minister when Urmas Reinsalu poses a question). There is no articulation of a search for compromise; instead, the government's failures are stressed.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the government (ministers and their parties) and the Riigikogu Board. The government is criticized for its policies (VAT, social issues) and incompetence, with specific examples highlighted, such as combining the Clyde Kulli case and the compensation for tanker damages into a single draft bill. The Board is criticized for its procedural decisions, particularly for discussing important topics late at night.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the Minister of Finance, who is criticized both for policy (the complexity of documents, the meaninglessness of metrics) and for personal behavior. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of arrogantly insulting colleagues and considering himself the "ruler of an empire." There is no willingness to compromise; on the contrary, the cessation of the minister's behavior is demanded.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the coalition parties and specific ministers (the Minister of Finance, the Minister of the Interior), who are accused of incompetence and wasting resources. Criticism is aimed at both policy (the prison deal, tax policy) and procedure, stressing that the government only begins searching for sensible solutions after the intervention of the President or the Chancellor of Justice. The attacks are intense, and no possibility for compromise is offered.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at Kristen Michal's government and coalition, who stand accused of lacking a grasp on reality and exhibiting sheer recklessness, particularly concerning the presentation of the "wealth budget." The criticism is twofold: political (stagnation) and procedural (the coalition's poor attendance in the chamber and their disregard for proposed amendments). The speaker endorses the critique made by colleague Jaanson, labeling this administration a "government of the blind and the deaf."
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
Strong opposition has been directed at the Minister of Agriculture due to his absence and lack of availability during the crisis and important sessions. Criticism is also aimed at the rigidity of the Riigikogu and the decision by a specific MP (Õnne Pillak) to forcefully terminate the debates. The criticism is primarily procedural and action-based, rather than a substantive attack on the policy itself.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and his party (the Reform Party), who stand accused of concealing information, creating uncertainty, and making a mockery of security. The criticism is intense and personal, hinting that the government will soon have to "take a rest" and that their support is "ridiculously low."
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism targets the fiscal policy of the government or responsible institutions (the Bank of Estonia), which is deemed illogical because a low debt burden is maintained despite serious social problems. The criticism is based on both policy and logic.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The confrontation is directed against the ruling government coalition and specific ministers (Minister of the Interior Taro, Jürgen Ligi), who are accused of laxity, laziness, and violating the constitution. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, particularly concerning laws related to control and surveillance ("thought police"). The coalition is described as being "in agony" and acting "pig-headedly."
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The main opponents are the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party and Estonia 200. The criticism is intense and centers on the coalition's lack of credibility and the disregard for parliamentary working procedures (attendance).
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are Ando Kiviberg and Maris Lauri, who are being criticized for "stubbornly" re-submitting the super database bill. Criticism is also aimed at former Minister of the Interior Igor Taro and the Eesti 200 faction, the latter of whom are criticized for procedural passivity in their role as the head of the Constitutional Committee.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Rural Affairs, which are accused of mismanagement and the elimination of regional jobs. The government as a whole is described as weak and decaying ("a rotten tree"), prioritizing defense expenditures above social spending. The criticism is intense and accusatory, spanning everything from political incompetence to the sowing of "war hysteria."
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at those who tried to slap together a super database in a mad rush before the summer season, and who are now secretly preparing to bring it back out. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the lack of consultations with the Financial Supervisory Authority.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary conflict is with the government and the coalition, focusing on criticism of the minister's personal conduct (arrogance, maintaining a certain lifestyle/image) and unethical decisions (specifically, the Health Insurance Fund gift). Procedural criticism targets the coalition's "steamroller" tactics in voting down draft bills, as well as the incompetence of officials (evidenced by confusion over directives and regulations). The speaker demands the minister's resignation due to a lack of integrity.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The primary opponent is the prime minister and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of outright failure in economic management. The criticism is intense and focuses on the tangible outcomes of the government's performance, rather than merely on procedures. Estonia's failures in controlling inflation are being contrasted with the successes achieved by neighboring states.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The opposition's stance is aimed directly at Minister of Defense Hanno Pevkur and the Reform Party, who are being branded as a "bragging bunch." The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inefficiency, slow response times (specifically citing the Defense Committee's week-long recess), and the "disarray" within the Ministry of Defense. The attacks are both political and personal, demanding the Minister of Defense's resignation.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Criticism is primarily aimed at the Minister of Regional Affairs and other government members, who are accused of lax leadership and vacationing during the crisis (e.g., the attack drone incident in Elva municipality, the outbreak). The government’s budget policy is criticized for squeezing small subsidies and the uncontrolled financing of the Ministry of Defence. Personal attacks are intense and include sarcasm (referencing the minister’s “important work,” such as pig mating).
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is primarily aimed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the ruling coalition, accusing them of unfairness, double standards, and neglecting rural areas. The critic criticizes the policies and rhetoric of ministers (Terras, Pevkur, Purga) and specifically faults the Reform Party for the timing of the agriculture minister's address. The criticism is intense, going so far as to accuse the government of feeding Putin's war machine.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed at the proponents of the bill and the leadership of the Riigikogu, who are being criticized for faulty legislation and the use of an unprecedented fast-track procedure. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural threats and dangers to the rule of law, with the implication that this constitutes activity dangerous to the state.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed primarily at the inadequacies of the legislative process and the analysis presented, calling into question the presenter's claims that a short-term delay will not result in anything terrible. The opposition is intense and is rooted in skepticism toward the mitigating assertions that have been made, demanding more detailed data from the government representative regarding the consequences of the delays.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The standoff is directed at the prime minister and the government, criticizing their capacity to internationally promote the e-voting model. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, employing negative comparisons to Venezuela and Russia to underscore the government's failure.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the Social Democrats for their aggressive behavior during the debate on the Competition Act and, conversely, for their absence from the discussion regarding the far more crucial RAB Act. He attacks the government's "party faction" (singling out Kristen Michal as "Big Brother") for exhibiting totalitarian tendencies, claiming they are rushing legislation through because of their low public support. Furthermore, he slams Delfi and Eesti Ekspress, calling them mere fulfillers of political orders, which, in his view, is turning Estonia into a "banana republic."
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and the responsible ministers, focusing on the delays in drafting legislation and inefficient work. The criticism is procedural and intense, referencing previous failures (the time of Rainer Vakra) and the departure of the bill drafters. He quotes the Minister of Defence to call into question the appropriateness of the Minister of the Interior's actions.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets the coalition's "steamroller" tactics and the lack of transparency surrounding the budget process. He/She is particularly harsh on the Social Democrats regarding the penalty bill, accusing them of having a perverse desire for punishment and squandering public funds. Minister Annely, meanwhile, is criticized for ridiculing MPs and outright dismissing the opposition's proposed amendments.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism targets the quality of previous legislation, specifically noting that three acts (the Pre-primary Education Act, the Education Act, and the Food Act) fail to align with one another. Furthermore, the insufficient measurable benefit derived from the reports delivered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is also criticized, thereby calling their practical value into question. The criticism is both procedural and outcome-based.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed directly at the prime minister and the governing coalition, who are accused of denying reality, lacking public trust, and acting as a "steamroller" in parliament. The criticism is both political (focusing on the economic and demographic crises) and procedural (highlighting the government's extremely low approval ratings despite remaining in power). The speaker offers no compromise, instead demanding the complete dismantling of the current political structure.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is leveled at the governing parties (Reformierakond, Eesti 200) and the inaction of the ministries, accusing them of the failure to develop necessary financial instruments. He also criticizes the Riigikogu leadership (Lauri Hussar, Marek Reinaas, Urve Tiidus) regarding accountability when bills aimed at improving safety are not supported. More broadly, he criticizes the political culture where opposition bills are sent to the "trash can" under the pretext of lacking an impact analysis.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is directed at officials of the Ministry of Rural Affairs, who are accused of the unfair distribution of subsidies and poor communication with representatives of beekeepers. More broadly, members of the Riigikogu are criticized for their superficiality when examining the content of budget lines, being called "blind, vain, and superficial."
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism is aimed both at the previous government's failed energy plans and at the ministers of the current government. The speaker questions the forecasts presented by the ministers regarding the minimal impact of the regulations and directly opposes a colleague's proposal concerning sustainability reporting.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government's inaction or lack of clarity in implementing financial regulations (e.g., the stalling of instant payments). The criticism is policy- and procedure-driven, demanding clear information and explanations from the responsible minister regarding the content of the directives' comparison table.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main targets of criticism are the government and ministers, whose priorities and actions are being called into question. The criticism focuses on the political balance and the inadequate representation of national interests, particularly concerning the failure to utilize Estonian businesses. The criticism is policy- and performance-based.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and the proposers of the bills, who are accused of engaging in busywork and provocative behavior. He/She sharply criticizes the mocking of the US President and the imposition of gender balance quotas. The criticism is primarily procedural (timing, priorities) and political (the direction of foreign policy).
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is primarily aimed at the drafters of the bills (officials) for the unequal consideration of institutional opinions, citing as an example the near-zero weight given to the opinion of the Pärnu County Court. The sharpest opposition is directed at the activities of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) as a whole, which is viewed as a passive "rubber stamp" that fails to consider the future.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The challenge is directed at the minister to obtain information and accountability, focusing on the minister's personal conduct as a private citizen and their experiences with fraud. The criticism is primarily informative and does not include political or personal attacks, but instead demands the sharing of knowledge.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed more at the format and procedure of the parliamentary debate, where speakers may talk about irrelevant matters before expressing their actual position. Specific opponents or political groups are not being criticized.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), whose power he believes needs to be curtailed. He also criticizes the operations of the Ministry of Justice, particularly Jürgen Ligi, whom he describes as the "master of the state." Ligi is accused of behaving arrogantly, interrupting the Justice Minister's presentation and dismissing the proceedings as "pointless rubbish."
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who are accused of inaction, incompetence, and allowing fines to be incurred. The criticism is procedural (failure to adopt the directive) and financial, demanding financial accountability from the government.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the current government/coalition, who are criticized for ignoring the people, low public trust, and unethical policies. Specific accusations concern the alleged siphoning of wealth by the Social Democrats (SDE) and the "wind troika" through subsidies. The previous EKRE government and Martin Helme are also criticized for supporting the Sõnajalg brothers' wind farm.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the government’s actions, which critics accuse of exhausting and hating the populace, citing public opinion polls where 80% of respondents reported feeling worn out. Specific criticism is also leveled at former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas ("completely crazy") and the Minister of Defense for military bluster. The opposition is primarily policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of losing focus.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is directed at the government (the minister) and the decision-making processes of the Cultural Endowment of Estonia (Kultuurkapital), which are considered irregular and unjust. The critique targets both the devaluation of parliamentary work and a specific funding decision concerning "Estonia's most popular president."
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the e-voting system and its trustworthiness, implicitly pointing toward the administrators of the process. There are no direct attacks on political opponents or specific individuals.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic and the coalition, criticizing their political instability and rushed decision-making (e.g., the absence of impact analyses). Criticism is leveled both at the political execution and the competence of specific individuals (Aivar Kokk), who have been harshly assessed by the government. The government is also criticized for the loss of public trust stemming from the wind farm disputes.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary adversary is the government, which faces intense criticism regarding both the substance of its policies and procedural deficiencies (specifically, the lack of impact assessments). This criticism is fundamental, challenging the government's legitimacy by comparing it to an enemy that is draining the nation.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary backlash targets the actions taken by the previous government and its key figures (Kaja Kallas, Läänemets, Kristina Kallas, Jürgen Ligi) regarding the 2.6 billion euro energy plan. The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical questions, as well as suspicions of corruption and wealth redistribution. Läänemets is directly referred to as the "root of evil" who forced the plan through.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government, criticizing both the Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal administrations for overburdening the populace. The critique targets both the substance of the policy (harmful laws) and the procedural side (fast-track adoption and the lack of impact assessments). He criticizes coalition MPs for tossing the amendments proposed by the opposition (Isamaa and EKRE) "into the trash with a straight face," and points out the absence of coalition members during the debate.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which has been dubbed the "minority government." Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (the car tax, expenditures) and procedural deficiencies (killing proposed bills and simply rubber-stamping them in committees). Opponents are attacked intensely and personally, calling into question their moral responsibility to the people in rural areas.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary targets of criticism are the Minister of Finance (accused of wasting time and engaging in busywork) and former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, whose departure has left the economy in a catastrophic state. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of misplaced priorities at a time when the country faces acute problems.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.