Agenda Profile: Peeter Ernits

Inquiry Regarding the Bringing of Swedish Prisoners to Estonia (No. 792)

2025-09-22

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Political Position
The most prominent issue is the government's plan to transfer Swedish prisoners to Tartu Prison, which the speaker strongly opposes, deeming it short-sighted and dangerous. This stance is both value-driven and results-oriented, stressing the importance of public reputation and security over financial gain (30 million). The speaker criticizes the government's arrogance and its disregard for the opinions of local residents.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the financial aspect (30 million) and logistics (Tartu prison, Pirogov Square) of a specific project. Social consequences are also highlighted, such as the police staffing shortage and the movement of people toward better-paid jobs ("the juicier incentive"). The knowledge is rather anecdotal and personal (he knows the Mustafas by name), not statistical.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, emotional, and dramatic, employing shocking metaphors (such as "criminal uterus") and direct questions aimed at the prime minister. The speaker emphasizes fear and the destruction of Tartu's reputation, warning that the city could become a "joyful city for rapists and murderers." The overall tone is more informative and cautionary, demanding that the government take a "broader view" and make a wider assessment.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
We only have data concerning one Riigikogu (Parliamentary) inquiry, during which the speaker repeatedly posed questions to the Prime Minister. The speaker also mentions the intention to soon ask the Mayor of Tartu for his opinion regarding the prison plan.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice, as well as current and former officials, who are being criticized for their "arrogant approach." The criticism is aimed at political short-sightedness, the disregard for the opinions of local residents, and the potential harm caused to party colleagues (the Mayor of Tartu).

4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is insufficient information regarding cooperation. The speaker refers to Urmas Klaas, the Mayor of Tartu, as a polite man whose standing might be penalized by the misbehavior of his party colleagues in Tallinn, which rather suggests intra-party tensions.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong regional focus is placed on Tartu and Southern Estonia, which the speaker ironically refers to as the "Slavery South." Emphasis is placed on how bringing in prisoners damages Tartu's reputation (the "City of Good Thoughts") and the local living environment (Pirogov Square, Werner Café). Reference is also made to the previous local dispute over the super-pulp mill to underscore the disregard shown to local residents.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker acknowledges that utilizing the empty prison is financially sound ("30 million"), but stresses that the broader calculation must also factor in social and reputational damage. Concern is expressed regarding workforce migration, particularly within the police sector, where, following the "principle of communicating vessels," personnel are moving to better-paid positions with more substantial lobbying.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is public safety and the bringing in of foreign criminals (Swedish criminals) to Estonia. The speaker uses a strong moral and security framework, warning that Tartu risks becoming a "mecca for rapists and murderers" and suffering reputational damage.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on criticizing and opposing a specific government agenda item—the transfer of Swedish prisoners to Estonia—by means of an official inquiry (interpellation). The speaker is clearly acting as an adversary, aiming to underscore the sheer unreasonableness of the government's proposal.

4 Speeches Analyzed